帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

右侧颞顶联合区及道德加工脑网络的功能连接预测社会性框架效应:来自静息态功能磁共振的证据
Functional connectivities of the right temporoparietal junction and moral network predict social framing effect: Evidence from resting-state fMRI

查看参考文献61篇

崔芳 1,2   杨佳苗 1   古若雷 3,4   刘洁 1,2 *  
文摘 社会性框架效应指个体进行社会性决策时,描述方式(即框架)对其选择倾向的影响。采用"伤害/帮助框架"范式,本研究在行为上发现了显著的框架效应:被试在伤害框架下比帮助框架下,更倾向于选择利他选项,这可能是由于伤害框架凸显了伤害他人的后果及有意性,从而提高了道德冲突水平。在神经活动上发现(1)静息态下,右侧颞顶联合区(TPJ)的低频振荡振幅(ALFF)与框架效应强度存在显著正相关; (2)道德加工相关脑区构成的局部脑网络内部的功能连接强度(FC)能够有效预测框架效应强度。本研究首次利用静息态功能连接探讨个体的社会性决策受到语言表述方式影响的神经机制,为进一步揭示社会决策中的个体差异提供了神经学证据。
其他语种文摘 As an important cognitive bias, the framing effect shows that individuals' decision preferences are sensitive to the verbal description (i.e., frame) of options. The social framing effect could be distinguished from the non-social one according to whether the decision would influence others. The psychological mechanisms of the non-social framing effect (e.g., Gain/Loss framing effect) and that of the social one are essentially different. When making non-social decisions, frames affect people's judgment of which option is more beneficial or less risky. When making social decisions, frames affect people's preferences through the influence of other-regarding concerns and social norms. In the present study, a new paradigm was developed to induce the social framing effect. We asked participants to make a tradeoff between economic benefits and the feelings of others; when participants showed a stronger preference for income maximization, the probability for their partners to receive a painful electrical shock would increase proportionally. This decision was described as either a "harm" to, or simply "not helping" other persons in two frame conditions. 30 participants (age: 20.58 ± 1.91 years old) were enrolled in the experiment and 24 of them were included in the final analysis. The resting-state functional magnetic resonance (rs-fMRI) data was acquired using the Echo Planar Imaging (EPI) sequence from a 3-T Siemens scanner. This scanning acquired 180 volumes with TR = 2 s (lasting 6 min). Rs-fMRI data were processed and analyzed using the DPABI and RESTplus toolbox to calculate the amplitude of low-Frequency Fluctuation (ALFF) and Functional Connectivity (FC). On the behavioral level, we found that participants made more prosocial decisions in the Harm frame compared to the Help frame condition, resulting in a significant social framing effect. For the resting fMRI analysis, we first run a whole-brain correlation analysis between ALFF and the behavioral index and found the ALFF of the right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ) could significantly predict the behavioral index of the social framing effect. Considering the observed social framing effect would result from different levels of moral conflict between Harm and Help frames, we predicted that it would be closely related to the moral network. Therefore, we further localized 12 seeds from a new, meta-analysis of functional MRI studies for moral processing. Seed-based FC analysis showed that the functional connectivity between the medial prefrontal cortex and the caudate was significantly associated with the behavioral index of the social framing effect. Multivariate machine learning-based regression analysis further confirmed these results, suggesting the importance of rTPJ and moral network for the observed social framing effect. The present study is based on a novel experimental paradigm, using resting functional imaging techniques to explore the brain mechanism of the social framing effect. We found that the ALFF value of the right TPJ and the strength of the functional connectivity value between the medial prefrontal lobe and the caudate within a moral network can effectively predict the social framing effect. This study is the very first one to explore the extent to which individual social decision-making can be influenced by verbal description and its underlying neural mechanisms, which shed light on the further exploration of individual differences in social decision-making.
来源 心理学报 ,2021,53(1):55-66 【核心库】
DOI 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00055
关键词 社会性框架效应 ; 静息态功能磁共振 ; 功能连接 ; 右侧颞顶联合区 ; 道德脑网络
地址

1. 深圳大学心理学院  

2. 深圳大学脑疾病与认知科学研究中心, 深圳, 518060  

3. 中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院行为科学重点实验室, 北京, 100101  

4. 中国科学院大学心理学系, 北京, 100049

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 0439-755X
学科 社会科学总论
基金 国家自然科学基金
文献收藏号 CSCD:6888336

参考文献 共 61 共4页

1.  Aupperle R L. Neural substrates of approach-avoidance conflict decision-making. Human Brain Mapping,2015,36(2):449-462 CSCD被引 1    
2.  Aupperle R L. A reverse translational approach to quantify approach-avoidance conflict in humans. Behavioural Brain Research,2011,225(2):455-463 CSCD被引 2    
3.  Berns G S. The price of your soul: Neural evidence for the non-utilitarian representation of sacred values. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,2012,367(1589):754-762 CSCD被引 4    
4.  Biswal B. Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine,1995,34(4):537-541 CSCD被引 254    
5.  Brosch T. The importance of actions and the worth of an object: Dissociable neural systems representing core value and economic value. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience,2012,7(5):497-505 CSCD被引 2    
6.  Bzdok D. Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy. Brain Structure Function,2012,217(4):783-796 CSCD被引 2    
7.  Cole M W. Activity flow over resting-state networks shapes cognitive task activations. Nature Neuroscience,2016,19(12):1718-1726 CSCD被引 7    
8.  Crockett M J. Harm to others outweighs harm to self in moral decision making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2014,111(48):17320-17325 CSCD被引 11    
9.  Cui Z. The effect of machine learning regression algorithms and sample size on individualized behavioral prediction with functional connectivity features. Neuroimage,2018,178:622-637 CSCD被引 5    
10.  De Martino B. Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science,2006,313(5787):684-687 CSCD被引 34    
11.  De Vos F. A comprehensive analysis of resting state fMRI measures to classify individual patients with Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage,2018,167:62-72 CSCD被引 5    
12.  Decety J. Imagining being the agent of actions that carry different moral consequences: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia,2011,49(11):2994-3001 CSCD被引 3    
13.  Fox M D. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2005,102(27):9673-9678 CSCD被引 130    
14.  甘甜. 经颅直流电刺激右侧颞顶联合区对道德意图加工的影响. 心理学报,2013,45(9):1004-1014 CSCD被引 6    
15.  Garrigan B. The neural correlates of moral decision-making: A systematic review and meta-analysis of moral evaluations and response decision judgements. Brain and Cognition,2016,108:88-97 CSCD被引 4    
16.  Gotts S J. The perils of global signal regression for group comparisons: A case study of Autism Spectrum Disorders. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,2013,7:356 CSCD被引 2    
17.  Hare T A. Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system. Science,2009,324(5927):646-648 CSCD被引 45    
18.  Hoptman M J. Amplitude of low-frequency oscillations in schizophrenia: A resting state fMRI study. Schizophrenia Research,2010,117(1):13-20 CSCD被引 40    
19.  Jenkinson M. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage,2002,17(2):825-841 CSCD被引 47    
20.  Jia X Z. RESTplus: an improved toolkit for resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data processing. Science Bulletin,2019,64(14):953-954 CSCD被引 17    
引证文献 3

1 占友龙 声誉关注与社会距离对伤害困境中道德决策的影响:来自行为与ERPs的证据 心理学报,2022,54(6):613-627
CSCD被引 7

2 张航 行贿和受贿决策框架效应的分离 中国临床心理学杂志,2022,30(4):973-978
CSCD被引 0 次

显示所有3篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护:中国科学院文献情报中心
地址:北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码:100190 联系电话:(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号