厦门城市空间拓展的生态敏感性评价
Ecological Sensitivity Assessment of Bay-type City in Xiamen
查看参考文献20篇
文摘
|
在综合分析海湾型城市自然生态与社会生态属性的基础上,选取了高程、坡度、河流水库、植被覆盖、土地覆盖和生态保护区等6个因子,作为生态敏感性评价的指标。另外,借助GIS空间分析单因子评价与多因子加权综合评价方法,研究了生态敏感性程度及其空间分布特征,将厦门的生态敏感性划分为4级:不敏感、较敏感、中敏感和高敏感。综合评价结果表明,厦门市生态敏感性在空间分布上差异显著:高度敏感区占研究区总面积的28.1%,低敏感区和不敏感区分别占研究区总面积的27.9%和33.6%。中度敏感区占的比例较小,仅为10.4%。 |
其他语种文摘
|
With the implementation of development strategy of bay-type city, Xiamen City has been one of the most dynamic regions of the Western Taiwan Straits Economic Zone. However, it confronts the conflicts between the rapidly spatial expansion and the limited resources and environment. Based on the characteristic of natural ecology and social ecology of Xiamen City, taking example by related researched, elevation, slope, NDVI, rivers and reservoirs, land cover and protected area were selected to form the ecological sensitivity assessment indicator system. With the help of spatial analysis function of geographic information system, the ecological sensitivity degrees and their spatial distribution of the study area were quantitatively analyzed by single-factor evaluation method and multifactor weighted integrated assessment method. According to the level of ecological sensitivity, the study region was subdivided into four grades: insensitive, low sensitive, moderate sensitive, and highly sensitive. The integrated evaluation result showed that, significant differences were found in special distribution of Xiamen's ecological sensitivity. The high sensitive regions, accounting for 28.1% of total area, mainly concentrated in the northern part of Xiamen City, which displayed a half annular distribution. The moderate sensitive regions, which shared only 10.4% of total area, are presented as irregular spots or branches. The low sensitivity area, with 27.9% of total area, was distributed around the peripheral buffer zone of high sensitive regions and moderate sensitive regions. The insensitive areas, which accounted for 33.6% of total area, were mainly located in artificial business landscape. It was also found that the appropriate development area was Huli and Xiang'an District, while inappropriate development area was Tong'an District. This study could provide scientific references for land use optimization and regional eco-environment protection countermeasures in the process of urban development. |
来源
|
地球信息科学学报
,2013,15(3):389-394 【核心库】
|
关键词
|
海湾城市
;
生态敏感性
;
评价
;
空间分析
;
厦门
|
地址
|
国家海洋局第三海洋研究所, 厦门, 361005
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1560-8999 |
学科
|
环境质量评价与环境监测 |
基金
|
2011年中国海监科技支撑计划项目
;
福建省厦门市科技计划项目
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:4850322
|
参考文献 共
20
共1页
|
1.
国务院西部开发办领导小组办公室.
生态功能区划暂行规程,2002
|
CSCD被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
2.
徐福留. 区域生态系统可持续发展敏感因子及敏感区分析.
中国环境科学,2000,20(4):361-365
|
CSCD被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
3.
杨志峰. 城市生态敏感性分析.
中国环境科学,2002,22(4):360-364
|
CSCD被引
66
次
|
|
|
|
4.
刘康. 甘肃省生态环境敏感性评价及其空间分布.
生态学报,2003,23(12):2711-2718
|
CSCD被引
123
次
|
|
|
|
5.
颜磊. 北京市域生态敏感性综合评价.
生态学报,2009,29(6):3117-3125
|
CSCD被引
69
次
|
|
|
|
6.
钟林生. 基于生态敏感性分析的金银滩草原景区旅游功能区划.
应用生态学报,2010,21(7):1813-1819
|
CSCD被引
27
次
|
|
|
|
7.
欧阳志云. 中国生态环境敏感性及其区域差异规律研究.
生态学报,2000,20(1):9-12
|
CSCD被引
239
次
|
|
|
|
8.
徐广才. 阜康市生态敏感性评价研究.
北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2007,43(1):88-92
|
CSCD被引
44
次
|
|
|
|
9.
曹建军. GIS支持下上海城市生态敏感性分析.
应用生态学报,2010,21(7):1805-1812
|
CSCD被引
24
次
|
|
|
|
10.
黄静. 厦门市土地利用变化下的生态敏感性.
生态学报,2011,31(24):7441-7449
|
CSCD被引
49
次
|
|
|
|
11.
汪洋. 城市总体规划生态敏感空间信息图谱的GIS构建.
中国园林,2007(10):54-56
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
12.
张冶华. 生态敏感区划分指标体系研究.
生态科学,2007,26(1):79-83
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
13.
潘峰. 新疆克拉玛依市生态敏感性研究.
地理学报,2011,66(11):1497-1507
|
CSCD被引
49
次
|
|
|
|
14.
黄勇. 城市拓展空间信息图谱的建构与诊断.
土木建筑与环境工程,2009,31(3):98-103
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
15.
厦门市统计局.
厦门经济特区年鉴,2011:7-19
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
16.
沈清基. 城市生态敏感区评价的新探索----以常州市宋剑湖地区为例.
城市规划学刊,2011(1):58-66
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
17.
杨月圆. 云南省土地生态敏感性评价.
生态学报,2008,28(5):2253-2260
|
CSCD被引
51
次
|
|
|
|
18.
张培. 面向数字城市总体规划生态敏感信息价图谱构建的GIS方法.
地理信息世界,2009(1):75-79
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
19.
吴金华. 基于ArcGIS区统计的延安市土地生态敏感性评价.
自然资源学报,2011,26(7):1180-1188
|
CSCD被引
47
次
|
|
|
|
20.
汤国安.
ArcGIS地理信息系统空间分析实验教程,2006
|
CSCD被引
290
次
|
|
|
|
|