环境与资源价值CV评估预测有效性研究进展
Predictive Validity of Contingent Valuation on Environment and Resource Programs:A Review
查看参考文献52篇
|
文摘
|
条件价值法是评估非市场产品价值的最重要方法,在环境与资源价值评估中得到广泛的应用,预测有效性是条件价值研究中最为核心的内容。论文在对环境与资源项目条件价值评估预测有效性实证研究回顾与分析的基础上,初步总结了导致CV有效性差的主要原因,认为无收入限制、温暖光辉以及"答非所问"等诸多原因均来自市场的虚拟性。介绍了提高CV预测有效性的三类主要措施,即事前措施、事后措施及事间措施。同时分析了CV预测有效性表达方式的局限性,提出应合理看待CV预测有效性的结果。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Contingent valuation(CV) is a mainstream approach to estimating valuation of nonmarket goods,especially of environmental and resource program.As contingent valuation method is on ground of a fiction market,CV validity is ongoing debated,and predictive validity is the core of debasements. CV predictive validity refers to the consistency between people’s sayings and their doings,and Calibration factor(Cf) is used as its characteristic.The closer Cf is to 1,the better CV predictive validity is. In this paper,we retrospected CV predictive validity case studies on environment and resource programs at first.Literature on Cf meta-analysis showed that CV has poor predictive validity,and attribution of the evaluated goods matter. Five factors were summarized as influencing factors of CV predictive validity: without income constraints,warm glow,irrelevant answer,strategic behavior and uncertainty.We deemed these factors could all be attributed to the hypothetical nature of CV deal market.CV hypothetical nature is the primary cause to its poor validity. Three kinds of countermeasures were introduced to improve CV predictive validity: ex ante countermeasures such as cheap talk,ex post countermeasures like follow-up certainty question,and in medias res mitigation countermeasures. We also analyzed the limitation of CV predictive validity expression.Though Cf is a good index of CV validity,good predictive is not equal to scientific.A good Cf does not mean a good CV study;it just represents the market authenticity.At the end of this paper some future research prospect were presented.We call for CV mechanism design research work to improve CV validity fundamentally. |
|
来源
|
自然资源学报
,2012,27(8):1421-1430 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
环境与资源价值
;
条件价值
;
预测有效性
;
校正因子
|
|
地址
|
福建师范大学环境科学研究所, 福州, 350007
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
ISSN
|
1000-3037 |
|
学科
|
环境科学基础理论 |
|
基金
|
国家教育部人文社会科学研究项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:4619873
|
参考文献 共
52
共3页
|
|
1.
张茵. 用条件估值法评估九寨沟的游憩价值———CVM方法的校正与比较.
经济地理,2010,30(7):1205-1211
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
陈应发. 条件价值法———国外最重要的森林游憩价值评估方法.
生态经济,1996(5):35-37
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
薛达元. 环境物品的经济价值评估方法:条件价值法.
农村生态环境,1999,15(3):39-43
|
CSCD被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
杜亚平. 改善东湖水质的经济分析.
生态经济,1996(6):15-20
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
徐中民. 额济纳旗生态系统恢复的总经济价值评估.
地理学报,2002,57(1):107-116
|
CSCD被引
77
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
张明军. 不确定性影响下的平均支付意愿参数估计.
生态学报,2007,27(9):3852-3859
|
CSCD被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
刘亚萍. 生态旅游区自然环境的游憩价值——运用条件价值评价法和旅行费用法对武陵源风景区进行实证分析.
生态学报,2006,26(11):3765-3774
|
CSCD被引
18
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
赵军. 环境与生态系统服务价值的WTA／WTP不对称.
环境科学学报,2007,27(5):854-860
|
CSCD被引
23
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
许丽忠. 条件价值法评估旅游资源非使用价值的可靠性检验.
生态学报,2007,27(10):4301-4309
|
CSCD被引
19
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
张翼飞.
城市内河生态系统服务的意愿价值评估———CVM有效性可靠性研究的视角,2008
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
韩智霞.
初探WTA/WTP不对称的动力机制———兼评CVM实施框架,2010
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
赵菊勤.
条件价值评估法的有效性和可靠性研究,2009
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Mitchell R C.
Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method,1989
|
CSCD被引
33
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Bohm P. Estimating demand for public goods: An experiment.
European Economic Review,1972,3(2):111-130
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Carson R T. Incentive and informational properties of preference questions.
Environmental and Resource Economics,2007,37:181-210
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Sinden J. Empirical tests of hypothetical biases in consumers’surplus surveys.
Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics,1988,32:98-112
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Seip K. Willingness to pay for environmental goods in Norway: A contingent valuation study with real payment.
Environmental and Resource Economics,1992,2(1):91-106
|
CSCD被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Champ P. Using donation mechanisms to value nonuse benefits from public goods.
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1997,33:151-162
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Champ P. A comparison of contingent and actual voting behavior.
Proceedings from the W-133 Benefits and Cost Transfer in Natural Resource Planning, 10th Interim Report,1997
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Cummings R. Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: A cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method.
The American Economic Review,1999,89(3):649-666
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问