SWAT模型对高精度土壤信息的敏感性研究
Sensitivity of SWAT Model to Detailed Soil Information
查看参考文献24篇
文摘
|
土壤信息是SWAT模型的重要输入数据,通常认为,土壤信息的精度直接影响着模拟结果的准确性。本文以美国Brewery Creek流域(19.5km^2)为例,在其他输入不变的情况下,通过比较不同精度土壤数据(美国农业部SSURGO土壤图与SoLIM方法获得的土壤图)的模拟径流,分析SWAT模型对高精度土壤信息的敏感性。应用结果显示,在模型的校正前后,两种土壤数据的径流模拟结果均近似,差别并不显著。这表明在小流域水文模拟中,SWAT模型的径流模拟对高精度土壤信息的敏感性较弱,模拟径流不能很好的体现一定精度基础上土壤信息的差别。本文将此现象主要归因于:SWAT模型所采用的SCS-CN径流计算方法,在计算CN值(Curve Number)时将不同土壤类型综合到四个土壤水文组的做法,概括了土壤信息,模糊了土壤之间的属性差别,损失了土壤精度信息。本研究发现了SCS-CN径流计算方法在利用高精度土壤数据时存在的问题,并进行了分析,为水文模拟中参数的确定和数据的准备提供了参考。 |
其他语种文摘
|
As an important component of input data, soil information directly impacts the accuracy of the simulation of hydrologic model. Sensitivity of SWAT model to detailed soil information was investigated through comparison of the simulated stream flow produced by using SSURGO and SoLIM as different soil input data. A case study was conducted in Brewery Creek, a 19.5km^2 area catchment in Dane County, Wisconsin. The simulation results before and after model calibration both indicate that there is only slight difference between the simulated strearnflow. This study reveals the weak sensitivity of SWAT model to detailed soil information in the hydrological modeling of a small watershed. The main reason for lack of insignificant difference is that soil information was highly aggregated in the model and that the use of Curve Number as means for representing soil variability in the model also muted the impact of detailed spatial information. |
来源
|
地球信息科学
,2007,9(3):72-78,90 【扩展库】
|
关键词
|
SWAT
;
SoLIM
;
土壤图
;
敏感性
;
CN值
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 资源与环境信息系统国家重点实验室, 北京, 100101
2.
Department of Geography University of WisconsinMadison, USA
3.
Department of Geography University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1560-8999 |
学科
|
自动化技术、计算机技术 |
基金
|
中国科学院“百人计划”项目
;
中国科学院创新团队国际合作伙伴计划
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:2881429
|
参考文献 共
24
共2页
|
1.
J G Arnold.
SWRRB:A basin scale simulation model for soil and water resources management,1990
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
2.
R Srinivasan. Integration of a basin-scale water quality model with GIS.
Water Resources Bulletin,1994,30(3):453-462
|
CSCD被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
3.
J G Arnold. Continuous-time water and sediment-routing model for large basins.
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,1995,121(2):171-183
|
CSCD被引
42
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Texas Grassland. Soil and Water Research Laboratory Agricultural Research Service.
http://www.brc.tamus.edu/swat/swat2000doc.html,2001
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
5.
K Eckhardt. Automatic model calibration.
Hydrological Processes,2005,19(3):651-658
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
6.
M Govender. Modelling streamflow from two small South African experimental catchments using the SWAT model.
Hydrological Processes,2005,19(3):683-692
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
7.
张银辉. SWAT模型及其应用研究进展.
地理科学进展,2005,24(5):121-130
|
CSCD被引
44
次
|
|
|
|
8.
张东. SWAT分布式流域水文物理模型的改进及应用研究.
地理科学,2005,25(4):434-440
|
CSCD被引
30
次
|
|
|
|
9.
张东. SWAT 2000气象模拟器的随机模拟原理、验证及改进.
资源科学,2004,26(4):28-36
|
CSCD被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
10.
张雪松. 亚流域划分对分布式水文模型模拟结果的影响.
水利学报,2004(7):119-128
|
CSCD被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
11.
郝芳华. 降雨的空间不均性对模拟产流量和产沙量不确定的影响.
地理科学进展,2003,22(5):446-453
|
CSCD被引
19
次
|
|
|
|
12.
A X Zhu. Effects of spatial detail of soil information on watershed modeling.
Journal of Hydrology,2001,248:54-77
|
CSCD被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
13.
T Lenhart. Comparison of two different approaches of sensitivity analysis.
Physics and Chemistry of the Earth,2002,27:645-654
|
CSCD被引
88
次
|
|
|
|
14.
A A Romanowicz. Sen-sitivity of the SWAT model to the soil and land use data parameterisation:a case study in the Thyle catchment Belgium.
Ecological Modelling,2005,187:27-39
|
CSCD被引
33
次
|
|
|
|
15.
R S Muttiah. Scale-dependent soil and climate variability effects on watershed water balance of the SWAT model.
Journal of Hydrology,2002,256:264-285
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
16.
J M Peschel.
A SSURGO pre-processing extension for the ArcView Soil and Water Assessment Tool.ASAE Meeting Presentation,Paper No.032123,2003:27-30
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
17.
A X Zhu. A similarity model for representing soil spatial information.
Geoderma,1997,77:217-242
|
CSCD被引
24
次
|
|
|
|
18.
詹道江.
工程水文学,2000:163-168
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
19.
Trevor Quinn. Effects of detailed soil spatial information on watershed modeling across different model scales.
International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation,2005,7:324-338
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
20.
A X Zhu. Soil mapping using GIS expert knowledge and fuzzy logic.
Soil Science Society of America Journal,2001,65(5):1463-1472
|
CSCD被引
42
次
|
|
|
|
|