帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

汉语口语句子产生的语法编码计划单元
Grammatical Planning Scope in Sentence Production: Evidence from Chinese Sentences

查看参考文献37篇

文摘 语法编码的计划单元作为口语句子产生领域的一个重要命题,近年来备受心理语言学者的关注。本研究利用词图干扰范式下的语义效应,通过两个行为实验探讨了汉语口语句子产生中的语法编码计划单元。实验中要求被试用介词短语做主语的句子或者并列名词短语做主语的句子来命名两个竖直排列的图片,并视觉呈现干扰词。结果表明,对于两个句式而言,在第二个名词上都没有潜伏期的语义干扰效应,只有错误率上的语义干扰效应,而且这个结果并没有随着SOA(目标图片和干扰词开始呈现的时间间隔)的改变(0、150或300ms)而改变。当干扰词与图片同时呈现时(SOA=0)在并列名词短语做主语的句子中,第二个名词上出现了潜伏期的语义促进效应。这些结果说明,语法编码的说法较为宽泛,应具体描述为:词汇选择是严格递进的,而概念激活的计划单元可能是功能短语。
其他语种文摘 The grammatical planning scope in sentence production is an important issue and investigated by many psycholinguists. Regarding the grammatical level proper, the planning scope is often considered to be constrained by certain grammatical units, such as a clause (a sentence fragment consisting at least of a subject and a predicate), a subject noun phrase (the phrase including all nouns associated with the grammatical role of subject), or just a content word. Recently this planning scope was specified as a functional phrase. This issue, however, remains controversial. The goal of the current study is to thus clarify the scope of planning at the grammatical processing level of sentence production, especially to test the functional phrase hypothesis. In the current study the functional phrase hypothesis was tested with the picture-word interference paradigm. Native Mandarin Chinese speakers were asked to produce sentences with a prepositional phrase modified subject (e.g., ‘‘the dog under the flower is red’’) or sentences with a conjoined noun phrase as the subject (e.g., ‘‘the dog and the flower are both red’’) in response to vertical pairs of objects, and each display was accompanied by a visual distractor. The distractor could be categorically related or unrelated to the target picture on which it was presented, and was always unrelated to the other picture. Forty-three undergraduate and graduate students in total participated in this study and were asked to name pictures with the required syntactic structures as accurately and quickly as possible while ignoring the distractor. Two separate analyses were carried out with participants and items as random factors for onset latencies and error rates. There was a semantic interference effect for the first noun in both utterance formats, showing longer latencies in categorically related conditions compared to unrelated conditions. For the second noun of both utterance formats, the semantic interference effect was found in error rates rather than in onset latencies, no matter which SOA (Stimulus Onset Asynchrony) the condition was (0, 150, or 300ms). Meanwhile in the condition of SOA=0, a semantic facilitation effect in onset latencies was observed on the second noun of sentences with a conjoined noun phrase as the subject. These results suggest that the grammatical planning scope should be specified as that the lexical selection is radically incremental while the conceptual planning scope may encompass the functional phrase.
来源 心理学报 ,2013,45(6):599-613 【核心库】
关键词 口语句子产生 ; 计划单元 ; 语法编码 ; 词汇选择 ; 词图干扰范式
地址

中国科学院心理研究所, 北京, 100101

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 0439-755X
学科 社会科学总论
文献收藏号 CSCD:4862917

参考文献 共 37 共2页

1.  Allum P H. Planning scope in spoken sentence production: The role of grammatical units. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,2007,33:791-810 CSCD被引 1 次    
2.  Allum P H. Scope of lexical access in spoken sentence production: Implication for the conceptual-syntactic interface. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,2009,35:1240-1255 CSCD被引 1 次    
3.  Bloem I. Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in language production: Further evidence for the conceptual selection model of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language,2004,51:307-323 CSCD被引 4 次    
4.  Bock J K. Language production: Grammatical encoding. Handbook of psycholinguistics,1994:945-984 CSCD被引 2 次    
5.  Chang F. Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review,2006,113:234-272 CSCD被引 7 次    
6.  Costa A. Accessing object names when producing complex noun phrases: Implications for models of lexical access. Cognitiva,2006,18:3-23 CSCD被引 2 次    
7.  Dell G S. A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review,1986,93:283-321 CSCD被引 26 次    
8.  Finkbeiner M. Now you see it, now you don't: On turning semantic interference into facilitation in a Stroop-like task. Cortex,2006,42(6):790-796 CSCD被引 6 次    
9.  Garrett M F. The analysis of sentence production. Psychology of learning and motivation,1975:133-177 CSCD被引 1 次    
10.  Garrett M F. The analysis of sentence production. Psychology of learning and motivation,1975:505-529 CSCD被引 1 次    
11.  Garrett M F. Syntactic processes in sentence production. New approaches to language mechanisms,1976:231-255 CSCD被引 2 次    
12.  Griffin Z M. Gaze durations during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding. Cognition,2001,82:B1-B14 CSCD被引 2 次    
13.  Jescheniak J D. Utterance format affects phonological priming in the picture-word task: Implications for models of phonological encoding in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,2003,29:441-454 CSCD被引 3 次    
14.  Kempen G. An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science,1987,11:201-258 CSCD被引 3 次    
15.  Levelt W J M. Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition,1983,14:41-104 CSCD被引 2 次    
16.  Levelt W J M. Speaking: From intention to articulation,1989 CSCD被引 10 次    
17.  Levelt W J M. Lexical search and order of mention in sentence production. Crossing the linguistic boundaries,1981:221-252 CSCD被引 1 次    
18.  Levelt W J M. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,1999,22:1-75 CSCD被引 56 次    
19.  MacKay D G. The problems of flexibility, fluency, and speed-accuracy trade-off in skilled behavior. Psychological Review,1982,89:483-506 CSCD被引 1 次    
20.  Mahon B Z. Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,2007,33:503-535 CSCD被引 7 次    
引证文献 1 篇

1 赵黎明 言语产生中音韵编码的计划广度:来自图-词干扰范式的证据 心理科学,2020,43(2):265-271
CSCD被引 0 次

显示所有1篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护：中国科学院文献情报中心
地址：北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码：100190 联系电话：(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号