渠道权力结构与责任成本分担下供应链质量及协调研究
The research on quality and coordination in supply chains under channel power structures and liability cost sharing
查看参考文献29篇
|
文摘
|
责任成本分担合同已被供应链企业广泛采纳以降低产品安全事故.基于此,构建了一个由制造商与零售商组成的供应链博弈模型,在三种渠道权力结构下,研究了责任成本分担对制造商产品质量决策等的影响,并考察了渠道权力结构对供应链均衡结果及契约协调的影响.结果表明:若制造商为领导者,则其责任成本分担的增加不影响其产品质量与供应链企业利润,反之,将促进其产品质量与供应链企业利润的增加;制造商为领导者时的产品质量可达到供应链系统最优;领导权力可使制造商获得较大利润,但对零售商不一定适用;制造商为领导者时可通过零售商收益分享与制造商转移支付实现协调,反之,可通过一个相同的由制造商收益分享与零售商质量成本分担、转移支付构成的组合契约实现协调. |
|
其他语种文摘
|
The liability cost sharing contract has been widely used by the firms in supply chains to avoid the occurrence of a product safety incident.In view of it,by considering a supply chain that consists of a manufacturer and a retailer,this paper studies the impacts of the liability cost sharing on the manufacturer's quality decisions under three different channel power structures,and then investigates the impacts of channel power structures on the equilibrium results and coordinations.The results show that: an increase in the share of the liability cost allocated to the manufacturer has no impact on the product quality level and the profitability for each supply chain member if the manufacturer is the leader of supply chain,but leads to a higher product quality level and higher profits for both supply chain members if the manufacturer's leader position is lost;the quality level of the product reaches the first-best level of the supply chain system if the manufacturer is the leader;the manufacturer,instead of the retailer,can benefit from its relatively higher channel power;when the manufacturer has a relatively higher channel power,a scheme combining a retailer's revenue sharing contract and a manufacturer's transfer payment contract can effectively coordinate the supply chain,otherwise,the decentralized supply chain can be coordinated by a same scheme which consists of a manufacturer's revenue sharing contract,a retailer's quality cost sharing contract,and a retailer's transfer payment contract. |
|
来源
|
系统工程理论与实践
,2020,40(7):1767-1779 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.12011/1000-6788-2019-1068-13
|
|
关键词
|
供应链
;
质量
;
责任成本分担
;
渠道权力结构
;
协调
|
|
地址
|
1.
南京财经大学营销与物流管理学院, 南京, 210023
2.
合肥工业大学管理学院, 合肥, 230009
3.
桂林电子科技大学商学院, 桂林, 541004
4.
九江学院经济与管理学院, 九江, 332005
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1000-6788 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6793936
|
参考文献 共
29
共2页
|
|
1.
Chao G H. Quality improvement incentives and product recall cost sharing contracts.
Management Science,2009,55(7):1122-1138
|
CSCD被引
42
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Aiello M A.
General motors announces new 50/50 warranty share program for all new business orders,2010
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
刘学勇. 线性需求下的产品召回成本分担和质量激励.
系统工程理论与实践,2012,32(7):1400-1407
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
林晶. LR-型模糊需求下供应链的质量控制与成本分担.
控制与决策,2016,31(4):678-684
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Fan J. Product quality choice in two-echelon supply chains under post-sale liability: Insights from wholesale price contract.
International Journal of Production Research,2017,55(9):2556-2574
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
范建昌. 产品责任、责令召回与供应链中的产品质量选择.
管理工程学报,2018,32(4):101-109
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Maiti T. Two-way product recovery in a closed-loop supply chain with variable markup under price and quality dependent demand.
International Journal of Production Economics,2017,183(1):259-272
|
CSCD被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Luo Z. The effect of customer value and power structure on retail supply chain product choice and pricing decisions.
Omega,2018,77(7):115-126
|
CSCD被引
17
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Luo Z. Optimal pricing policies for differentiated brands under different supply chain power structures.
European Journal of Operational Research,2017,259(2):437-451
|
CSCD被引
20
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Hong Z. Green product design considering functional-product reference.
International Journal of Production Economics,2019,210(4):155-168
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
冯颖. 不同权力结构下TPL服务增值的供应链决策与效率评价.
中国管理科学,2018,26(10):164-175
|
CSCD被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
杨艳. 不同权力结构下供应链企业社会责任激励.
中国管理科学,2019,27(3):144-156
|
CSCD被引
17
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
范建昌. 不同渠道权力结构下的供应链企业社会责任与产品质量研究.
管理学报,2019,16(5):754-764
|
CSCD被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Pan K. Revenue-sharing versus wholesale price mechanisms under different channel power structures.
European Journal of Operational Research,2010,203(2):532-538
|
CSCD被引
32
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Chen J. Cooperative quality investment in outsourcing.
International Journal of Production Economics,2015,162(4):174-191
|
CSCD被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Choi T. Channel leadership, performance and coordination in closed loop supply chains.
International Journal of Production Economics,2013,146(1):371-380
|
CSCD被引
42
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Chakraborty T. Cost-sharing mechanism for product quality improvement in a supply chain under competition.
International Journal of Production Economics,2019,208(2):566-587
|
CSCD被引
17
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Zhang J. Manufacturer encroachment with quality decision under asymmetric demand information.
European Journal of Operational Research,2019,273(1):217-236
|
CSCD被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Hafezi M. Green product development and environmental performance: Investigating the role of government regulations.
International Journal of Production Economics,2018,204(10):395-410
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Zhang J. Contract and product quality in platform selling.
European Journal of Operational Research,2019,272(3):928-944
|
CSCD被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问