青少年自我控制双系统量表中文版的效度和信度
Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Dual-Mode of Self-Control Scale for adolescents
查看参考文献21篇
文摘
|
目的:修订自我控制双系统量表(DMSC-S)中文版,并检验其效度和信度。方法:选取5个省的4462名青少年进行问卷调查,回收有效问卷3978份。通过项目分析筛选项目,将总样本随机分半后分别进行探索性因素分析(n=1990)和验证性因素分析(n=1988)。两周后,从总样本中选取716名青少年进行重测。结果:经过3次探索性因素分析,得到的DMSC-S中文版有21个条目,分为控制系统(包含问题解决、未来时间观2个因子)和冲动系统(包含冲动性、易分心、低延迟满足3个因子),累计方差贡献率为50.55%。双系统模型的验证性因素分析所得指标均符合心理测量学的要求(RMSEA=0.06、NFI=0.92、NNFI=0.92、CFI=0.93)。总量表的Cronbach α系数为0.82,控制系统、冲动系统分别为0.74、0.80,5个因子分别为0.71、0.61、0.80、0.60、0.48;总量表的重测信度(r)为0.77,控制系统、冲动系统分别为0.64、0.75,5个因子分别为0.58、0.62、0.76、0.64、0.63。结论:青少年自我控制双系统量表中文版具有较好的结构效度和信度,适合用于评估我国青少年的自我控制能力水平。 |
其他语种文摘
|
Objective:To revise the Chinese version of the Dual-Mode of Self-Control Scale (DMSC-S) for adolescents,and test its validity and reliability.Methods:Totally 4,462 adolescents from 5 provinces were recruited and asked to complete the Chinese version of DMSC-S.Item analysis was conducted to identify valid items and revise the scale.Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to confirm the structure of the scale.Two weeks later,716 of the participants were retested.Results:The revised scale consisted of 21 items,including "good control" (problem solving,future time perspective) and "poor control"(impulsivity,distractibility,and poor delay of gratification).The factors explained 50.55% of the total variance.Besides,the CFA indicators of the dual-modes of self-control were in requirements of psychometric (RMSEA=0.06,NFI=0.92,NNFI=0.92,CFI=0.93).The Cronbach α coefficient of the scale was 0.82.The coefficients of "good control" and "poor control" were 0.74 and 0.80.Those of the 5 factors were 0.71,0.61,0.80,0.60 and 0.48.The test-retest reliability was 0.77.The test-retest reliabilities were 0.64 for "good control" and 0.75 for "poor control". Those of the 5 factors were 0.58,0.62,0.76,0.64 and 0.63.Conclusion:It suggests that the Chinese version of DMSC-S could be used as an effective and reliable tool for assessing self-control of Chinese adolescents. |
来源
|
中国心理卫生杂志
,2014,28(5):386-391 【核心库】
|
关键词
|
自我控制
;
双系统模型
;
效度
;
信度
;
心理测量学
|
地址
|
中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室, 北京, 100101
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1000-6729 |
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
基金
|
中国科学院心理研究所科研启动经费(社交网站互动经验对青少年自我概念的影响作用)
;
国家科技支撑计划项目
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5138694
|
参考文献 共
21
共2页
|
1.
Dvorak R D. Moderation of resource depletion in the self-control strength model:differing effects of two modes of self-control.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,2009,35(5):572-583
|
CSCD被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
2.
Hofmann W. Impulse and self-control from a dual-systems perspective.
Perspect Psychol Sci,2009,4(2):162-176
|
CSCD被引
33
次
|
|
|
|
3.
Hare T A. Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system.
Science,2009,324(5927):646-648
|
CSCD被引
44
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Wills T A. Self-control,symptomatology,and substance use precursors:test of a theoretical model in a community sample of 9-year-old children.
Psychol Addict behav,2007,21(2):205-215
|
CSCD被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Casey B J. The adolescent brain.
Dev Rev,2008,28(1):62-77
|
CSCD被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Steinberg L. A Social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking.
Dev Rev,2008,28(1):78-106
|
CSCD被引
29
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Steinberg L. A dual systems model of adolescent risk-taking.
Dev Psychobiol,2010,52(3):216-224
|
CSCD被引
15
次
|
|
|
|
8.
Somerville L H. A time of change:behavioral and neural correlates of adolescent sensitivity to appetitive and aversive environmental cues.
Brain Cogn,2010,72(1):124-133
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
9.
Delgado M R. Reward-related responses in the human striatum.
Ann N Y Acad Sci,2007,1104:70-88
|
CSCD被引
17
次
|
|
|
|
10.
Ochsner K N. The cognitive control of emotion.
Trends Cogn Sci,2005,9(5):242-249
|
CSCD被引
60
次
|
|
|
|
11.
Wills T A. The role of self-control in early escalation of substance use:a time-varying analysis.
J Consult Clin Psychol,2002,70(4):986-997
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
12.
Wills T A. Behavioral and emotional self-control:relations to substance use in samples of middle and high school students.
Psychol Addict Behav,2006,20(3):265-278
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
13.
Wills T A. Temperament and novelty seeking in adolescent substance use:convergence of dimensions of temperament with constructs from Cloninger' s theory.
J Pers Soc Psychol,1998,74(2):387-406
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
14.
胡凤姣. 自我控制量表在中学生中的试用.
中国健康心理学杂志,2012,20(8):1183-1184
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
15.
谭树华. 大学生自我控制量表的修订.
中国临床心理学杂志,2008,16(5):468-470
|
CSCD被引
81
次
|
|
|
|
16.
王红姣.
中学生自我控制能力及其与学业成绩的相关研究,2003
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
17.
许毅.
病理性网络使用大学生的自我控制能力研究,2006
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
18.
吴明隆.
问卷统计分析实务:SPSS操作与应用,2010
|
CSCD被引
91
次
|
|
|
|
19.
Hu Lt. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis:conventional criteria versus new alternatives.
Struct Equat Model Multidiscipl J,1999,6(1):1-55
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
20.
Vandenberg R J. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature:suggestions,practices,and recommendations for organizational research.
Organizat Res Methods,2000,3(1):4-70
|
CSCD被引
38
次
|
|
|
|
|