帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

气氛强度:理论基础及其研究框架
Climate Strength: Theoretical Foundation and Research Framework

查看参考文献56篇

蒋丽 1   李永娟 2   田晓明 3 *  
文摘 随着多层次理论的发展,气氛强度成为组织管理研究中受到关注的新概念。以多层次理论中的合成模型和文化强度为理论基础,研究者对气氛强度的前因变量及其作用开展了一系列的研究。本文在回顾气氛强度的理论基础和研究框架的基础上,提出未来研究首先应补充气氛强度前因变量的探索;并在不同行业和不同工作类型中去验证气氛强度的作用;最后应关注对气氛的概念界定,从而扩展对气氛强度的研究。
其他语种文摘 For more than half a century, scholars have sought to understand the antecedents and influences of climates. Climate strength, an emerging concept in climate research, received little empirical exploration and much less validation. Research adopted dichotomous perspective has limited climate strength as a scientific construct. The dichotomous view suggests that dispersion of individual -level perception represents error, rather than theoretically significant phenomenon. Within - unit dispersion of individual - level constructs can be theoretically meaningful. During the application of multilevel theory in organizational and management research, climate strength, i. e., within - unit agreement among unit members' climate perceptions, has received much attention from researchers. Two different literatures in organizational sciences, compositional models and culture strength, were useful as a basis for the development of the concept of climate strength. Based on the existing research, we develop the research framework of climate strength. There are three perspectives to explain the antecedents of climate strength, i. e., organizational structure, Attraction - Selection - Attrition model, and social interaction approach. According to the organizational structure perspective, organizational forms that are clearly mechanistic or clearly organic have strong climates, with weaker climates emerging for organizations with more ambiguous forms. Research based on ASA model indicated average worksite tenure was positively related to climate strength such that higher average tenure was associated with stronger climates. Empirical research based on social interaction approach illustrated that climate strength is influenced both by leadership style and group social interaction. While concerning the effect of climate strength, studies have yielded contradictory and inconclusive results. In some research, climate strength has been shown to have a moderating effect on the relationship between climate level and organizational outcomes. While in other studies, significant main effects were found for some of the climate strength - outcome relationships. Potential reasons of the results were discussed. For example, the tasks used in different studies were various. In some research, tasks were completed by individuals, while in others tasks required cooperation within team members. Thus, work interdependence may be a potential factor moderating the relationship between climate strength and outcomes. In future research, we should pay more attention to the prerequisite of climate strength, broaden the conceptualization of organizational climate, explore the effect of climate strength in a variety of work types and industries, and test the potential moderator influence of work interdependent between climate strength and organizational outcomes.
来源 心理科学 ,2012,35(6):1466-1473 【核心库】
关键词 气氛强度 ; 组内一致性 ; 多层次理论
地址

1. 苏州大学东吴商学院, 苏州, 215021  

2. 中国科学院心理研究所, 北京, 100101  

3. 苏州大学苏南发展研究院, 苏州, 215006

语种 中文
ISSN 1671-6981
学科 社会科学总论
基金 国家自然科学基金项目 ;  国家教育部人文社会科学研究项目 ;  国家自然科学基金项目
文献收藏号 CSCD:4731828

参考文献 共 56 共3页

1.  白新文. 两类共享心智模型的发展特征.博士学位论文,2006 CSCD被引 1 次    
2.  李原(译). 企业文化:企业生活中的礼仪与仪式,2008 CSCD被引 1 次    
3.  任婧. 互依性与团队协作. 心理科学进展,2007,15(1):146-153 CSCD被引 4 次    
4.  姚琦. 组织社会化研究的整合：交互作用视角. 心理科学进展,2008,16(4):590-597 CSCD被引 7 次    
5.  于广涛. 组织行为学:构建未来的工作-生活空间,2009 CSCD被引 1 次    
6.  Ashforth B E. Climate formation: issues and extensions. Academy of Management Review,1985,10(4):837-847 CSCD被引 5 次    
7.  Barling J. Development and test of a model linking safety - specific transformational leadership and occupational safety. Journal of Applied Psychology,2002,87(3):488-496 CSCD被引 17 次    
8.  Bass B M. The implications of transactional and transformational leadership for individual, team, and organizational development. Research in Organizational Change and Development,1990:231-272 CSCD被引 8 次    
9.  Beus J M. The influence of organizational tenure on safety climate strength : a first look. Accident Analysis & Prevention,2010,42(5):1431-1437 CSCD被引 2 次    
10.  Bliese P D. Group consensus and psychological well - being: a large field study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,1998,28(7):563-580 CSCD被引 1 次    
11.  Brown K G. The dispersion model: beyond a dichotomous conceptualization of emergent constructs. Paper presented at the the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology,1999 CSCD被引 1 次    
12.  Burke M J. On average deviation indices for estimating interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods,1999,2(1):49-68 CSCD被引 2 次    
13.  Burke M J. Estimating interrater agreement with the average deviation index: a user's guide. Organizational Research Methods,2002,5(2):159-172 CSCD被引 1 次    
14.  Chan D. Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis : a typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology,1998,83(2):234-246 CSCD被引 35 次    
15.  Clarke S. The role of leader influence tactics and safety climate in engaging employees' safety participation. Risk Analysis,2006,26(5):1175-1185 CSCD被引 7 次    
16.  Cole M S. Dispersion - composition models in multilevel research: a data - analytic framework. Organizational Research Methods,2011 CSCD被引 1 次    
17.  Cooper M D. Exploratory analysis of the safety climate and safety behavior relationship. Journal of Safety Research,2004,35(5):497-512 CSCD被引 15 次    
18.  Dickson M W. When organizational climate is unambiguous, it is also strong. Journal of Applied Psychology,2006,91(2):351-364 CSCD被引 1 次    
19.  Glick W H. Response: organizations are not central tendencies: shadowboxing in the dark, round 2. Academy of Management Review,1988,13(1):133-137 CSCD被引 1 次    
20.  Gonzalez-Roma V. An examination of the antecedents and moderator influences of climate strength. Journal of Applied Psychology,2002,87(3):465-473 CSCD被引 2 次    
引证文献 1 篇

1 朱海腾 多层次研究的数据聚合适当性检验:文献评价与关键问题试解 心理科学进展,2020,28(8):1392-1408
CSCD被引 1 次

显示所有1篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护：中国科学院文献情报中心
地址：北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码：100190 联系电话：(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号