眼动技术在个体认知能力差异研究中的应用
The Application of Eye-Movement Technique in the Study of Individual Cognitive Differences
查看参考文献38篇
|
文摘
|
本文从可能性和可行性两方面介绍和论述了眼动技术在个体认知能力差异研究中的应用。在可能性方面,个体眼动特征具有的良好的重测信度和内部一致性信度;在可行性方面,已有研究利用注视和眼跳相关指标、眼动轨迹和瞳孔直径这三类指标对该问题进行探索,结果均发现这些眼动特征与认知能力之间存在着密切关系。今后研究应继续深入探索两者关系的内在认知和神经机制,并尝试结合人工智能算法开发高信效度的眼动认知测验。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Eye-movement technique has been widely used in the studies of cognitive psychology.The application of eye-movement technique in studying individual differences in cognitive ability has also attracted researchers' attention.Previous studies have successfully identified individuals with psychological disorders(such as autism spectrum disorder and schizophrenia)by using eye-movement analysis.Whether eye-movement characteristics can accurately reflect the cognitive ability of normal people is worth exploring.In this review, we first introduced the good reliability of individuals' eye-movement characteristics.Studies indicated that eye-movement characteristics had good test-retest reliability and internal consistency reliability, which laid the foundation for using eye-movement characteristics to measure cognitive abilities.Subsequently, we systematically summarized the relationship between eye-movement characteristics and cognitive abilities from three aspects:fixation and saccade related indicators, scan patterns, and pupil size.These studies provided substantial evidence that eye-movement characteristics could reflect individuals' cognitive abilities such as intelligence and working memory.To be specific, individuals with high cognitive abilities showed more efficient information processing in eye-movement tasks such as visual searching and reading, reflecting in longer saccade amplitude and lower proportion of long fixation duration.In intelligence tests, individuals with high cognitive abilities tended to select more efficient strategies according to the test's rules.Take Raven's advanced progressive matrices test as an example, high intelligence individuals spent longer time on encoding the problem and demonstrated less toggling rate between problem area and response alternatives area.In addition, studies focusing on scan patterns developed powerful quantitative analysis tools in recent years, which brings new vitality to qualitative scan patterns.These studies found that indicators based on quantitative scan patterns perform better than conventional fixation or saccade indicators in predicting individuals' cognitive abilities.Moreover, pupil size, a more physiological indicator indirectly reflecting the activity of locus coeruleus norepinephrine(LC-NE)system, also has close relations with cognitive abilities.However, the correlation between cognitive abilities and tonic(baseline)pupil size remains controversial for several reasons, such as the diverging definition of baseline and different measurements for cognitive abilities.The correlation between phasic(task-related)pupil size and cognitive abilities was close to an agreement according to the control hypothesis.For tasks that require more exploration, individuals with high cognitive abilities tend to fully utilize their cognitive resources to complete these tasks, causing their phasic pupil size to dilate more than low cognitive abilities individuals.In contrast, for tasks that require more exploitation, they tend to utilize fewer resources to efficiently complete these tasks, causing their phasic pupil size to dilate smaller than individuals with low cognitive abilities.Studies have revealed the close relationship between various eye-movement characteristics and cognitive abilities, indicating that eye-movement technique is a promising tool for measuring individual cognitive differences with good reliability and validity.Future studies need to further explore the causal relationship, internal cognitive mechanism, and underlying neurobiological basis between eye-movement characteristics and cognitive abilities.Also, the influences of possible moderating variables(e.g., age, task type, task difficulty and physical properties of stimulus materials)should be fully considered in relative studies.Furthermore, it is worth exploring to develop reliable and valid cognitive ability tests combined with artificial intelligence algorithm based on eye-movement characteristics. |
|
来源
|
心理科学
,2021,44(3):552-558 【扩展库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20210306
|
|
关键词
|
眼动
;
眼动特征
;
认知能力
;
个体差异
;
眼动轨迹
;
瞳孔直径
|
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院行为科学重点实验室, 北京, 100101
2.
中国科学院大学心理学系, 北京, 100049
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1671-6981 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
中国科学院"率先行动"计划特色研究所项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:7092122
|
参考文献 共
38
共2页
|
|
1.
彭聃龄.
普通心理学,2012
|
CSCD被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
邢秀侠. “工欲效其事,必先信其器”——个体差异的科学靠谱吗?.
科学通报,2019,64(24):2465-2467
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
赵晓宁. 基于眼动研究的孤独症谱系障碍早期预测.
心理科学进展,2019,27(2):301-311
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Abdi Sargezeh B. Investigation of eye movement pattern parameters of individuals with different fluid intelligence.
Experimental Brain Research,2019,237(1):15-28
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Ahern S. Pupillary responses during information processing vary with scholastic aptitude test scores.
Science,1979,205(4412):1289-1292
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Aminihajibashi S. Individual differences in resting-state pupil size: Evidence for association between working memory capacity and pupil size variability.
International Journal of Psychophysiology,2019,140:1-7
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Aston-Jones G. An integrative theory of locus coeruleusnorepinephrine function: Adaptive gain and optimal performance.
Annual Review of Neuroscience,2005,28:403-450
|
CSCD被引
23
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Bargary G. Individual differences in human eye movements: An oculomotor signature?.
Vision Research,2017,141:157-169
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Bornemann B. Mathematical cognition: Individual differences in resource allocation.
ZDM,2010,42(6):555-567
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Carter B T. Individuals' eye movements in reading are highly consistent across time and trial.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,2018,44(3):482-492
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Ettinger U. Reliability of smooth pursuit, fixation, and saccadic eye movements.
Psychophysiology,2003,40(4):620-628
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Foster T E. Reliability and validity of eye movement measures of children's reading.
Reading Research Quarterly,2018,53(1):71-89
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Guillon M. The effects of age, refractive status, and luminance on pupil size.
Optometry and Vision Science,2016,93(9):1093-1100
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Hayes T R. Scan patterns during real-world scene viewing predict individual differences in cognitive capacity.
Journal of Vision,2017,17(5):23
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Hayes T R. Pupil diameter tracks the explorationexploitation trade-off during analogical reasoning and explains individual differences in fluid intelligence.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,2016,28(2):308-318
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Hayes T R. A novel method for analyzing sequential eye movements reveals strategic influence on Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices.
Journal of Vision,2011,11(10):10
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Hayes T R. Do we really become smarter when our fluid-intelligence test scores improve?.
Intelligence,2015,48:1-14
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Heitz R P. Effects of incentive on working memory capacity: Behavioral and pupillometric data.
Psychophysiology,2008,45(1):119-129
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Henderson J M. Stable individual differences in saccadic eye movements during reading, pseudoreading, scene viewing, and scene search.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,2014,40(4):1390-1400
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Henderson J M. Neural correlates of individual differences in fixation duration during natural reading.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,2018,71(1):314-323
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问