中国“四化”协调发展的区域格局及其影响因素
Spatial pattern and influencing factors of the coordination development of industrialization, informatization, urbanization and agricultural modernization in China: A prefecture level exploratory spatial data analysis
查看参考文献36篇
文摘
|
工业化、城镇化、信息化与农业现代化(简称“四化”)是促进城乡统筹和区域发展的现实需要与战略导向。本文着力构建综合评价指标体系以揭示我国地级区域四化协调发展的空间格局,借助空间计量经济模型探讨四化协调发展的影响因素,结合相关分析探讨四化协调指数与区域发展主要指标的关联关系,建立识别方法开展基于四化发展状态的问题区域识别研究。结果表明:四化各自发展水平、综合指数、耦合度、协调度均存在明显的空间差异;四化协调发展水平越高,区域经济发展水平和农村发展水平越高,而城乡居民的收入差距和消费差距越低;社会经济、交通区位及自然地理类要素对四化协调状况有不同程度的影响,尤以农业和农村的社会投资、财政投入及金融支持,以及大中型企业发展、道路基础设施建设、居民消费等因素对四化协调发展的影响更为稳健而积极;识别出四化发展存在若干问题的7类计145个地市,主要分布在中部传统农区、西南山地丘陵区和青藏高原区。在城乡转型发展新时期,推进四化协调发展既需要共性制度创新,还需要针对问题区域及其区域问题研制区域政策,有必要继续加大对农业农村的社会投资、财政投入与金融扶持力度,积极扩大内需,优化外向型经济发展战略,提升城镇投资和教育投资的效率。 |
其他语种文摘
|
The coordination development of industrialization, informatization, urbanization and agricultural modernization (so called "Sihua Tongbu" in Chinese, and hereinafter referred to as "new four modernizations"; China first put forward the term of "four modernizations" in the early 1960s, targeting the fields of industry, agriculture, national defense and science and technology) is practical need and strategic direction of integrating urban-rural development and regional development in recent China. This study mainly aims to explore the spatial pattern and influencing factors of coordination development of new four modernizations of China's prefecture-level regions. Firstly, we established a comprehensive evaluation index system to reveal the spatial pattern of coordination development of new four modernizations. And then, Pearson correlation analysis was used to explore the relationship between the coordinating degrees of new four modernizations and main indicators reflecting regional development state. Thirdly, a spatial econometric model was employed to explore the factors affecting the coordination development of the new four modernizations. Moreover, a set of rules based on the coordination development level of the new four modernizations has been established to identify the problematic region. The main contents and results were summed up as follows: (1) the respective development level of the new four modernizations and the coupling degree and coordinating degree of the new four modernizations shows obvious spatial difference. (2) The coordinating degree of new four modernizations is at relatively low level, and has significant positive correlation with per capita net income of farmers and per capita gross domestic product, and in contrast, it has significant negative correlation with both the income gap and consumption gap between urban and rural residents. (3) Socio-economic conditions, traffic location and physical geography conditions show obvious impacts on the coordinating state of new four modernizations, especially, on social investment, financial investment and financial support on agriculture and rural areas, as well as development level of large and medium-sized enterprise, road infrastructure density and social consumption, have robust and positive impacts on the coordinating state of new four modernizations. (4) A total of 145 prefecture-level cities have been identified as problematic regions according to their coordinating states of new four modernizations. These cities are mainly located in the traditional agricultural zones of central China, hilly areas of southwest China and the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Our findings may contribute to the knowledge of coordination development of industrialization, informatization, urbanization and agricultural modernization in the new era of urban-rural transformation development. To promote the coordination development of new four modernizations needs for top-level design, common institutional innovation, and regional policy innovation specifically for problematic regions. In addition, more social investment, financial investment and financial support for agricultural and rural development should be encouraged, and more attention should be paid to expand domestic demand actively, optimize the export-oriented economic development strategy, and enhance the efficiency of the investment in urban construction and education development. |
来源
|
地理学报
,2014,69(2):199-212 【核心库】
|
DOI
|
10.11821/dlxb201402005
|
关键词
|
工业化
;
信息化
;
城镇化
;
农业现代化
;
“四化”协调
;
空间格局
;
影响因素
;
问题区域
|
地址
|
中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 中国科学院区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室, 北京, 100101
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
0375-5444 |
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
基金
|
国家自然科学基金
;
中国博士后科学基金
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5061769
|
参考文献 共
36
共2页
|
1.
张培刚.
农业与工业化(上卷),1984
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
2.
Lewis W A. Economy development with unlimited supplies of labour.
The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies,1954,22(2):139-191
|
CSCD被引
143
次
|
|
|
|
3.
Jorgensen D W. Surplus agricultural labor and the development of a dual economy.
Oxford Economy Papers,1967,19(3):288-312
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Harris J. Migration, unemployment, and development: A two sector analysis.
American Economy Review,1970,60(1):126-142
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
5.
刘彦随. 中国县域耕地与农业劳动力变化的时空耦合关系.
地理学报,2010,65(12):1602-1612
|
CSCD被引
39
次
|
|
|
|
6.
吴传钧.
中国农业与农村经济可持续发展问题: 不同类型地区实证研究,2001
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
7.
陆大道.
2006中国区域发展报告: 城镇化进程及空间扩张,2007
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
8.
刘彦随. 中国东部沿海地区乡村转型发展与新农村建设.
地理学报,2007,62(6):563-570
|
CSCD被引
191
次
|
|
|
|
9.
方创琳.
城市化过程与生态环境效应,2008
|
CSCD被引
29
次
|
|
|
|
10.
陈佳贵. 中国地区工业化进程的综合评价和特征分析.
经济研究,2006(6):4-15
|
CSCD被引
35
次
|
|
|
|
11.
樊杰. 中国农村工业化的经济分析及省际发展水平差异.
地理学报,1996,51(5):398-407
|
CSCD被引
54
次
|
|
|
|
12.
谢康. 中国工业化与信息化融合质量: 理论与实证.
经济研究,2012(1):4-16, 30
|
CSCD被引
15
次
|
|
|
|
13.
顾朝林.
中国城市化: 格局·过程·机理,2008
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
14.
方创琳. 中国城市化发展阶段的修正及规律性分析.
干旱区地理,2008,31(4):512-523
|
CSCD被引
56
次
|
|
|
|
15.
陈明星. 中国城市化水平的综合测度及其动力因子分析.
地理学报,2009,64(4):387-398
|
CSCD被引
333
次
|
|
|
|
16.
蒋和平. 中国农业现代化发展水平的定量综合评价.
农业现代化研究,2006,27(2):87-91
|
CSCD被引
34
次
|
|
|
|
17.
李国平. 我国工业化与城镇化的协调关系分析与评估.
地域研究与开发,2008,27(5):6-11, 16
|
CSCD被引
25
次
|
|
|
|
18.
丁志伟. 中原经济区“三化”协调的内在机理与定量分析.
地理科学,2013,33(4):402-409
|
CSCD被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
19.
徐大伟. "三化"同步发展的内在机制与互动关系研究: 基于协同学和机制设计理论.
农业经济问题,2012(2):8-13
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
20.
钱丽. 中国区域工业化、城镇化与农业现代化耦合协调度及其影响因素研究.
经济问题探索,2012(11):10-17
|
CSCD被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
|