饲用抗生素替代品在畜禽生产中应用研究进展
Research Progress on Application of Feed Antibiotic Substitutes in Livestock and Poultry Production
查看参考文献75篇
|
文摘
|
抗生素的使用给畜禽健康提供了保障,但也给畜牧业的发展和食品安全带来了负面影响。抗生素替代品的研究与开发成为保证养殖业可持续发展的热点课题。本文综述了饲用抗生素替代品如酸化剂、微生态制剂、植物提取物、抗菌肽、微生物发酵饲料等功效的研究进展、存在的问题及展望,以期为畜禽生产中饲用抗生素替代品的研究与使用提供参考。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
The utilization of antibiotics has ensured the well-being of livestock and poultry, yet it has also brought about adverse effects on the healthy development of animal husbandry and food safety. The exploration and advancement of antibiotic alternatives have emerged as a prominent area of research to guarantee the sustainable progress of the livestock and poultry industry. This paper provides an overview on the efficacy, research advancement, existing challenge and future prospect pertaining to feed antibiotic substitutes including acidifiers, microecological preparations, plant extracts, antimicrobial peptides and microbial fermented feed, in order to offer guidance for researching and implementing feed antibiotic substitutes in livestock and poultry production. |
|
来源
|
动物营养学报
,2024,36(12):7502-7512 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.12418/CJAN2024.638
|
|
关键词
|
抗生素替代品
;
畜禽
;
研究进展
|
|
地址
|
1.
广东省农业科学院动物科学研究所, 猪禽种业全国重点实验室;;农业农村部华南动物营养与饲料重点实验室;;广东省畜禽育种与营养研究重点实验室, 广州, 510640
2.
全国畜牧总站, 北京, 100125
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
综述型 |
|
ISSN
|
1006-267X |
|
学科
|
畜牧、动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金项目
;
广东省农业科研类及技术推广示范类项目
;
广东省基础与应用基础研究基金
;
南雄市驻镇帮镇扶村农村科技特派员项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:7876239
|
参考文献 共
75
共4页
|
|
1.
奚玉莲. 酸化剂在生猪养殖中的应用.
中国饲料,2020(17):10-14
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
董子诚.
酸化剂的体外筛选及其对断奶仔猪生产性能、血液生化指标和粪便菌群的影响,2019
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Khan R U. Prospects of organic acids safe alternative to antibiotics in broiler chickens diet.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2022,29(22):32594-32604
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Lambert R J. Weak-acid preservatives: modelling microbial inhibition and response.
Journal of Applied Microbiology,1999,86(1):157-164
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
范志聪. 禁抗形势下的替抗产品分析与选择.
广东饲料,2021,30(5):11-14
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Wang C C. Dietary tributyrin attenuates intestinal inflammation,enhances mitochondrial function,and induces mitophagy in piglets challenged with diquat.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,2019,67(5):1409-1417
|
CSCD被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Xu Y T. Micro-encapsulated essential oils and organic acids combination improves intestinal barrier function,inflammatory responses and microbiota of weaned piglets challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli F4 (K88+).
Animal Nutrition,2020,6(3):269-277
|
CSCD被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Ren C X. Immune response of piglets receiving mixture of formic and propionic acid alone or with either capric acid or Bacillus licheniformis after Escherichia coli challenge.
BioMed Research International,2019,2019:6416187
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Manzanilla E G. Effect of plant extracts and formic acid on the intestinal equilibrium of early-weaned pigs.
Journal of Animal Science,2004,82(11):3210-3218
|
CSCD被引
37
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Wu H Z. Effects of dietary probiotics and acidifiers on the production performance,colostrum components,serum antioxidant activity and hormone levels,and gene expression in mammary tissue of lactating sows.
Animals:an Open Access Journal from MDPI,2023,13(9):1536
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Devi S M. Analysis of the effect of dietary protected organic acid blend on lactating sows and their piglets.
Revista Brasilerira de Zootecnia,2016,45(2):39-47
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Sandi S. Organic acid and probiotic derived from grass silage improved egg quality in Pegagan laying duck:a research note.
Tropical Animal Health and Production,2022,54(1):65
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
李贞明. 联合使用腐殖酸钠和酸化剂对黄羽肉鸡生长性能和肉品质的影响.
中国畜牧兽医,2023,50(12):4908-4916
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Gao C Q. Dietary supplementation with acidifiers improves the growth performance, meat quality and intestinal health of broiler chickens.
Animal Nutrition,2021,7(3):762-769
|
CSCD被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Zabek K. Dietary phytogenic combination with hops and a mixture of a free butyrate acidifier and gluconic acid maintaining the health status of the gut and performance in chickens.
Animals:an Open Access Journal from MDPI,2020,10(8):1335
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Debi M R. Response of growing rabbits to different levels of dietary citricacid.
Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science,2010,39(1/2):125-133
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
祁占胜. 微生态制剂对畜禽胃肠道功能调控作用研究进展.
畜牧兽医杂志,2019,38(5):29-33
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Salminen S. The international scientific association of probiotics and prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of postbiotics.
Nature Reviews: Gastroenterology & Hepatology,2021,18(9):649-667
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Chen W C. Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics in small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: opening up a new therapeutic horizon.
Indian Journal of Medical Research,2014,140(5):582-584
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Corthesy B. Cross-talk between probiotic bacteria and the host immune system.
Journal of Nutrition,2007,137(Suppl.2):781S-790S
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问