帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

认知和情感共情与负性情绪:情绪调节的作用机制
Associations between empathy and negative affect: Effect of emotion regulation

查看参考文献64篇

郭晓栋 1,2   郑泓 1,2   阮盾 1,2   胡丁鼎 1,2   王毅 1,2 *   王艳郁 3   陈楚侨 1,2  
文摘 情绪调节在社会情境中对认知和情感共情的影响尚待厘清,这一问题的阐明将有助于理解社会交互中负性情绪的产生和影响机制,为未来的社会认知干预提供理论基础。本文通过问卷调查验证了共情、情绪调节与负性情绪之间的关系,并采用中文版共情准确性任务探讨认知重评策略使用对共情情绪反应的影响。结果发现:情感共情与日常生活中更多的焦虑和压力有关,而认知共情与更少的抑郁情绪相关,认知重评和表达抑制均在共情与负性情绪之间起保护性调节作用;共情准确性任务中,使用认知重评策略能提高个体对他人消极情绪的共情准确性、降低自身的负性情绪体验;在积极情境下还可以增强个体的积极情绪。结果表明情绪调节,特别是认知重评,在认知和情感共情与负性情绪之间发挥着重要作用。
其他语种文摘 Empathy refers to understanding, inferring and sharing others' emotional states, which can be divided into affective and cognitive components. Although empathy contributes to prosocial behaviors and harmonious interpersonal relationships, it also increases an individual's negative emotional experiences and affect distress. Emotion regulation, the psychological process of managing one's own emotions, has been found to be closely associated with empathy. Cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression are two commonly used strategies to regulate emotions, of which cognitive reappraisal is effective in reducing negative emotional experiences while expressive suppression is usually correlated with more affective distress. However, the roles of emotion regulation strategies in the empathic response are still unclear. We conducted two studies to investigate the roles of emotion regulation on the negative affect related to empathy using self-report questionnaires and experimental task respectively. Study 1 administered the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy(QCAE), the Interpersonal Reactivity Index(IRI), the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire(ERQ), and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale(DASS-21) to 442 college students. The moderating effects of cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression on the association between empathy and negative affect were examined separately. Study 2 adopted the Chinese version of the Empathic Accuracy Task(EAT) to further examine the effect of emotion regulation(i.e. cognitive reappraisal) on cognitive empathy and affective responses. The EAT requires participants to continuously rate targets' emotional valence in video clips as a second person and rate emotional valence and arousal of both targets and themselves after each video. Seventy-five participants(33 for experiment 1 and 42 for experiment 2) were recruited to perform the EAT under two conditions, i.e., naturally viewing without any instructions and applying cognitive reappraisal while viewing the scenarios. Paired sample t tests and repeated-measure ANOVA were performed to examine the effect of cognitive reappraisal on task performance. Findings from Study 1 showed that affective empathy was significantly correlated with higher levels of anxiety and stress, while empathic concern was correlated with less anxiety, stress and depression. However, when participants endorsed cognitive reappraisal more frequently, such positive association between affective empathy and stress was reduced, while the negative association between empathic concern and anxiety was strengthened. Cognitive empathy was significantly correlated with reduced depression. Expressive suppression strengthened the negative association between cognitive empathy and depression. Moreover, negative correlations between cognitive empathy and anxiety as well as stress emerged for participants endorsing cognitive reappraisal more frequently. Findings from Study 2 showed that task performances of the EAT were significantly improved when participants endorsed cognitive reappraisal strategy compared to the condition of naturally viewing. Specifically, under the cognitive reappraisal condition participants scored higher empathic accuracy, experienced less negative affect in reaction to others' affect distress, and experienced more positive affect in reaction to others' positive emotions. Taken together, the findings from these two studies suggested that both cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression play a protective role in the associations between empathy and negative affect, and the endorsement of cognitive reappraisal would improve task performance on both cognitive and affective empathy. Our findings shed light on the psychological mechanisms of empathy and provide new approach for improving individuals' social cognitive ability, especially for early intervention in clinical and subclinical populations.
来源 心理学报 ,2023,55(6):892-904 【核心库】
DOI 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2023.00892
关键词 认知共情 ; 情感共情 ; 认知重评 ; 表达抑制 ; 负性情绪
地址

1. 神经心理学与应用认知神经科学实验室(中国科学院心理研究所), 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室, 北京, 100101  

2. 中国科学院大学心理系, 北京, 100049  

3. 潍坊医学院心理学院, 山东, 潍坊, 261053

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 0439-755X
学科 社会科学总论
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目
文献收藏号 CSCD:7477940

参考文献 共 64 共4页

1.  Aldao A. Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review,2010,30(2):217-237 CSCD被引 47 次    
2.  Augustine A A. On the relative effectiveness of affect regulation strategies: A meta-analysis. Cognition & Emotion,2009,23(6):1181-1220 CSCD被引 3 次    
3.  Bennik E C. The relation between empathy and depressive symptoms in a Dutch population sample. Journal of Affective Disorders,2019,242:48-51 CSCD被引 1 次    
4.  Butler E A. Emotion and emotion regulation: Integrating individual and social levels of analysis. Emotion Review,2009,1(1):86-87 CSCD被引 1 次    
5.  Chan R C K. Extending the utility of the Depression Anxiety Stress scale by examining its psychometric properties in Chinese settings. Psychiatry Research,2012,200(2/3):879-883 CSCD被引 7 次    
6.  Chen W J. Effects of cardiovascular arousal on emotional experience. Stress and Health,2022,38(5):870-878 CSCD被引 1 次    
7.  程利. 情绪调节策略:认知重评优于表达抑制. 心理科学进展,2009,17(4):730-735 CSCD被引 38 次    
8.  Christov-Moore L. Empathy: Gender effects in brain and behavior. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews,2014,46:604-627 CSCD被引 7 次    
9.  Davis M H. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1983,44(1):113-126 CSCD被引 72 次    
10.  Decety J. Empathy as a driver of prosocial behaviour: Highly conserved neurobehavioural mechanisms across species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences,2016,371(1686):11 CSCD被引 11 次    
11.  Derntl B. Generalized deficit in all core components of empathy in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research,2009,108(1/3):197-206 CSCD被引 8 次    
12.  Di Girolamo M. The Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy: A comparison between paper-and-pencil versus online formats in Italian samples. Journal of Personality Assessment,2019,101(2):159-170 CSCD被引 1 次    
13.  Domes G. The neural correlates of sex differences in emotional reactivity and emotion regulation. Human Brain Mapping,2010,31(5):758-769 CSCD被引 9 次    
14.  Dryman M T. Emotion regulation in social anxiety and depression: A systematic review of expressive suppression and cognitive reappraisal. Clinical Psychology Review,2018,65:17-42 CSCD被引 15 次    
15.  Dziobek I. Dissociation of cognitive and emotional empathy in adults with asperger syndrome using the multifaceted empathy test (MET). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,2008,38(3):464-473 CSCD被引 19 次    
16.  Eippert F. Regulation of emotional responses elicited by threat-related stimuli. Human Brain Mapping,2007,28(5):409-423 CSCD被引 10 次    
17.  Engen H G. Compassion-based emotion regulation up-regulates experienced positive affect and associated neural networks. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience,2015,10(9):1291-1301 CSCD被引 2 次    
18.  Faul F. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods,2009,41(4):1149-1160 CSCD被引 116 次    
19.  Goldin P R. The neural bases of emotion regulation: Reappraisal and suppression of negative emotion. Biological Psychiatry,2008,63(6):577-586 CSCD被引 55 次    
20.  Gross J J. Antecedent-and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1998,74(1):224-237 CSCD被引 108 次    
引证文献 8 篇

1 黄郁 留守经历女大学生心理韧性与心理困扰的关系:认知重评的中介作用和压力知觉的调节作用 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2023,32(9):846-852
CSCD被引 0 次

2 史宏睿 情绪调节在肿瘤和安宁疗护护士共情与共情疲劳间的中介作用 军事护理,2023,40(9):5-9
CSCD被引 1 次

显示所有8篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护：中国科学院文献情报中心
地址：北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码：100190 联系电话：(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号