帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

行为决策理论在能源节约管理中的应用
Application of Behavioral Decision Theory in Energy Conservation Management

查看参考文献47篇

李鹏娜 1   王延伸 1   杨金花 2   孙彦 1 *  
文摘 能源短缺是人类面临的重要课题,节约能源是人类需要采取的刻不容缓的行动。仅仅依赖金钱刺激很难解决能源浪费问题,而心理与行为科学可以发挥重要作用。本文梳理了应用行为决策的经典理论(如,安于现状偏差、决策双系统模型、参照点效应、框架效应和社会规范等)促进节能行为的研究成果,同时总结了诸如情绪、认知对象特点、信息呈现等影响个体节能行为的因素,最后从开展本土化研究、研究方式改进和拓展应对措施的角度对未来研究提出建议。希望本文能给心理学研究者一定的借鉴和启发,在节能管理领域做出更有价值的研究,以最终提高民众节能意识、增加民众节能行为。
其他语种文摘 Energy shortage is one of the most difficult problems that human-beings need to solve. Human-beings use energy in everyday life, including water, gas, fossil oil and so on. Energy plays an important role in the development of human. However, the lack of awareness of energy conservation and bad habits in everyday life lead to the increasingly serious energy shortage. Owing to the fact that much energy is non-renewable; human-beings should realize the importance of energy-saving. Researchers have tried many ways to persuade individuals to encourage people to conserve energy, most of which are financial incentive. But the effectiveness of these approaches is complex, as they apply rational thinking to decision-making but ignore the non-rational decision processes. It seems that humanity is fated to be irrational. Instead of making a comprehensive cost analysis, People often use mental shortcuts or rules of thumb to complete a decision. Behavioral science concentrates on the deviation from standard rational decisionmaking models, and emphasizes the biases and errors resulted from irrationality in decision-making. By reviewing related literature that examines how biases in decision making can be used to encourage individuals' energy-saving behaviors and promote policy decisions; we find these studies use simple interventions to nudge people to make more optimal energy-saving decisions. Several decision biases and theories related to energy-saving decision are discussed, such as status quo bias, reference point effect, framing effect, duel system theory and social norm. Status quo bias is a preference for the current state and default option which makes people tend to do nothing and keep the current or previous decision, though the it is not the most favorable choice. In addition, individuals will set a reference point in decision-making and consider less or great energy consumption, then they will adjust the energy-consumption behaviors. Furthermore, framing effect means that two normatively equivalent descriptions of the same option often lead to systematically different choices. Different descriptions of energy-saving behavior lead to different choices in energy-saving. Besides, duel system theory proposes that there are separate cognitive systems that control human decisions: System 1 and System 2, the decision processes of which are distinct and interactive. System 1 makes decisions be fast, heuristic and automatic while System 2 makes decisions be slow, reflective and deliberate. Researches show that System 1 governs most of the energy-consumption decisions without specific energy-saving methods. Therefore, the heuristic strategy employed by it tends to result in wasting energy behavior. People's behavior is greatly influenced by others, which becomes the powerful effect of social norms. When it comes to energy-saving, the norm-based interventions work primarily by making people more aware of their own behavior. Then, the influencing factors of the energy-saving decision are also discussed, including the way and content of energy-saving information dissemination, the characteristics of cognitive objects and emotion. In the end, we predict the directions of future research. We offer three main potential directions: (1) Pay more attention to indigenous research about energy-saving decision (2) Improve the method to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions (3) Seek for new interventions and apply them to practice.
来源 心理科学 ,2017,40(3):760-765 【核心库】
DOI 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20170338
关键词 家庭节能 ; 行为决策 ; 节能管理 ; 心理机制 ; 节能行为
地址

1. 中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院行为科学重点实验室, 北京, 100101  

2. 北京联合大学师范学院心理学系, 北京, 100011

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 1671-6981
基金 北京市自然科学基金 ;  2016年北京高等学校高水平人才交叉培养“实培计划”项目 ;  中国科学院行为科学重点实验室
文献收藏号 CSCD:6003034

参考文献 共 47 共3页

1.  凌文辁. 社会规范的跨文化比较. 心理学报,2003,35(2):246-254 CSCD被引 7 次    
2.  孙彦. 决策与推理的双系统——启发式系统和分析系统. 心理科学进展,2007,15(5):721-726 CSCD被引 64 次    
3.  Allcott H. Social norms and energy conservation. Journal of Public Economics,2011,95(9/10):1082-1095 CSCD被引 15 次    
4.  Arrow K J. Risk perception in psychology and economics. Economic Inquiry,1982,20(1):1-9 CSCD被引 9 次    
5.  Attari S Z. Changing household behaviors to curb climate change: How hard can it be?. Sustainability: The Journal of Record,2011,4(1):9-11 CSCD被引 1 次    
6.  Attari S Z. Enabling energy conservation through effective decision aids. Journal of Sustainability Education,2015,8:1-15 CSCD被引 1 次    
7.  Avineri E. Applying valence framing to enhance the effect of information on transport-related carbon dioxide emissions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,2013,48:31-38 CSCD被引 1 次    
8.  Baucells M. Reference-point formation and updating. Management Science,2011,57(3):506-519 CSCD被引 13 次    
9.  Cassotti M. Positive emotional context eliminates the framing effect in decision-making. Emotion,2012,12(5):926-931 CSCD被引 5 次    
10.  Chong D. A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication,2007,57(1):99-118 CSCD被引 2 次    
11.  Cialdini R B. Managing social norms for persuasive impact. Social Iniluence,2006,1(1):3-15 CSCD被引 1 次    
12.  Cialdini R B. Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology,2004,55:591-621 CSCD被引 35 次    
13.  Cialdini R B. A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1990,58(6):1015-1026 CSCD被引 39 次    
14.  Dietz T. Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2009,106(44):18452-18456 CSCD被引 14 次    
15.  Druckman J N. Emotion and the framing of risky choice. Political Behavior,2008,30(3):297-321 CSCD被引 3 次    
16.  Druckman J N. Framing and deliberation: How citizens' conversations limit elite influence. American Journal of Political Science,2003,47(4):729-745 CSCD被引 2 次    
17.  Ek K. The devil is in the details: Household electricity saving behavior and the role of infonnation. Energy Policy,2010,38(3):1578-1587 CSCD被引 4 次    
18.  Ganlner G T. The short list: The most effective actions US. households can take to curb climate change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development,2008,50(5):12-25 CSCD被引 1 次    
19.  Gerald C A. Enhancing quality of life: The effects of positive cognitions. Doctor Dissertation,2015 CSCD被引 1 次    
20.  Goldstein N J. A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research,2008,35(3):472-482 CSCD被引 16 次    
引证文献 6 篇

1 刘隽 接受还是拒绝?反应模式助推基础课与拓展课均衡选择 心理学报,2019,51(4):437-449
CSCD被引 1 次

2 戚海峰 绿色消费情境下消费者为什么会言行不一? 心理科学进展,2019,27(7):1307-1319
CSCD被引 1 次

显示所有6篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护：中国科学院文献情报中心
地址：北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码：100190 联系电话：(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号