帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

羞耻情绪对欺骗行为的影响:自我控制的作用
The influence of shame on deceptive behavior:The role of self-control

查看参考文献53篇

范伟 1   任梦梦 1   肖俊泽 1   简增郸 1   杜晓明 1   傅小兰 2,3 *  
文摘 本文通过4个实验考察羞耻情绪对欺骗行为的影响,并进一步探讨这一影响存在的条件及其机制。实验1考察羞耻情绪对欺骗的影响,结果发现羞耻组的欺骗行为和欺骗倾向显著低于控制组。实验2将羞耻分为道德失范和能力不足两种情景,考察羞耻对欺骗产生影响的条件,结果发现,道德失范羞耻组的欺骗行为显著低于能力不足羞耻组和控制组。实验3a考察道德失范所引发的羞耻对自我控制资源的影响,结果发现,羞耻情绪诱发组的自我控制任务成绩显著高于未诱发组。实验3b考察自我控制资源在羞耻情绪影响欺骗行为中的作用,结果发现,自我控制资源在羞耻情绪影响欺骗的过程中起完全中介作用。这些研究结果表明,当个体的羞耻情绪由道德失范而诱发时,会遏制其欺骗行为的产生;羞耻情绪对欺骗行为的影响机制可能是:感受到羞耻的个体,为恢复和保护受损的道德自我,通过调集更多自我控制资源的方法影响欺骗行为的出现。
其他语种文摘 Shame,as a typical moral emotion,has an influence on individual behavior that is both complex and controversial.Previous studies have found that shame produces both an unpleasant experience and a moral emotion that encourages individuals to produce positive behaviors.In recent years,Hooge's research has proceeded from the perspective of motivation.He believes that,no matter how shame makes individuals perform,their motivation is to restore and protect the damaged self.Therefore,based on Hooge's theory,this research will examine this typical immoral behavior as an example to discuss the impact of shame upon it and its ways.In this study,students from a university were randomly selected as participants,and the number of each experiment's participants was arranged according to the experimental requirements.Questionnaires and behavioral experiments were used throughout the experiment,and the experimental procedures were completed in accordance with the regulations of each experiment.The requirements for each experiment were different and the procedures for conducting the experiment were different.The statistical methods of the study were also based on the requirements of each experiment.Experiment 1 examines whether shame has an effect on deceptive behavior.Its results show that the number and tendency of deception in the shamed group were significantly lower than in the control group.To more fully explore the impact of shame on deceptive behavior in different contexts,Experiment 2 improved upon the deficiencies of Experiment 1 and divided shame situations into two types:moral anomie and lack of ability.It was found that the number of deceptions in the moral anomie shamed group was significantly lower than that in the control group,and the number of deceptions in the lack of ability shamed group was significantly higher than that in the control group.To examine the specific methods and mechanisms of shame in affecting deception,we propose that shamed individuals increase their self-control resources and,thus,reduce the theory of fraud.Experiment 3a examined the impact of shame on self-control resources and found that the self-control resources of the shamed group were significantly higher than those of the control group.Experiment 3b explored the specific mechanisms of shame affecting deceptive behavior.It was found that self-control resources played a complete mediating role in the process of shame in affecting deception.In summary,these findings suggest that shame can deter deception under certain conditions.The condition is that shame is caused by moral disorder rather than lack of ability;the mechanism of shame in affecting behavior may be:Individuals who feel shame will restore and protect the damaged moral self by mobilizing more self-control resources to influence behavior.
来源 心理学报 ,2019,51(9):992-1006 【核心库】
DOI 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00992
关键词 羞耻情绪 ; 自我控制资源 ; 欺骗行为 ; 影响机制 ; 中介作用
地址

1. 湖南师范大学教育科学学院心理系, 认知与人类行为湖南省重点实验室, 长沙, 410082  

2. 中国科学院心理研究所, 脑与认知科学国家重点实验室, 北京, 100101  

3. 中国科学院大学心理系, 北京, 100101

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 0439-755X
学科 社会科学总论
基金 国家重点研发计划课题 ;  中国国家自然科学基金国际(地区)合作与交流项目 ;  国家自然科学基金面上项目 ;  湖南省社会科学基金 ;  湖南省自然科学基金 ;  湖南省教育厅重点项目
文献收藏号 CSCD:6565466

参考文献 共 53 共3页

1.  柏桦. 清代州县司法与行政--黄六鸿与《福惠全书》. 北方法学,2007,1(3):99-109 CSCD被引 1    
2.  Baumeister R F. Is there a downside to good self-control?. Self and Identity,2009,8(2/3):115-130 CSCD被引 5    
3.  Baumeister R F. Self-regulation and personality: How interventions increase regulatory success, and how depletion moderates the effects of traits on behavior. Journal of Personality,2010,74(6):1773-1802 CSCD被引 1    
4.  Bok B J. Star formation in or very close to a southern globule. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific,1978,90(537):489-490 CSCD被引 1    
5.  Chance Z. Temporal view of the costs and benefits of self-deception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2011,108(Sup. 3):15655-15659 CSCD被引 11    
6.  Cohen T R. Introducing the gasp scale: A new measure of guilt and shame proneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2011,100(5):947-966 CSCD被引 14    
7.  DePaulo B M. Lying in everyday life. Journal of personality and social psychology,1996,70(5):979-995 CSCD被引 12    
8.  Dewall C N. Depletion makes the heart grow less helpful: Helping as a function of self-regulatory energy and genetic relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,2008,34(12):1653-1662 CSCD被引 20    
9.  de Hooge I E. Predicting consumer behavior with two emotion appraisal dimensions: Emotion valence and agency in gift giving. International Journal of Research in Marketing,2014,31(4):380-394 CSCD被引 3    
10.  de Hooge I E. The social side of shame: Approach versus withdrawal. Cognition and Emotion,2018,32(8):1671-1677 CSCD被引 3    
11.  de Hooge I E. Not so ugly after all: When shame acts as a commitment device. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2008,95(4):933-943 CSCD被引 9    
12.  de Hooge I E. Restore and protect motivations following shame. Cognition and Emotion,2010,24(1):111-127 CSCD被引 7    
13.  de Hooge I E. A functionalist account of shame-induced behaviour. Cognition and Emotion,2011,25(5):939-946 CSCD被引 3    
14.  Ding X P. Neural correlates of spontaneous deception: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)study. Neuropsychologia,2013,51(4):704-712 CSCD被引 6    
15.  Eisenberg N. Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology,2000,51(1):665-697 CSCD被引 39    
16.  范伟. 欺骗判断与欺骗行为中自我控制的影响. 心理学报,2016,48(7):845-856 CSCD被引 5    
17.  高学德. 反事实思维与内疚和羞耻关系的实证研究(硕士学位论文),2006 CSCD被引 1    
18.  高学德. 大学生心理控制源与内疚感和羞耻感对反事实思维的影响. 心理发展与教育,2013,29(2):159-165 CSCD被引 3    
19.  Gino F. Unable to resist temptation: How self-control depletion promotes unethical behavior. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,2011,115(2):191-203 CSCD被引 27    
20.  Gomez R. Effects of neuroticism and avoidant coping style on maladjustment during early adolescence. Personality & Individual Differences,1998,26(2):305-319 CSCD被引 1    
引证文献 4

1 郝娜 补偿他人还是保护自己?内疚与羞耻情绪对合作行为的影响差异 心理科学进展,2022,30(7):1626-1636
CSCD被引 1

2 范伟 听障儿童错误信念理解与谎言理解的关系:情绪理解的调节作用 心理科学,2022,45(5):1123-1135
CSCD被引 0 次

显示所有4篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护:中国科学院文献情报中心
地址:北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码:100190 联系电话:(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号