特征类型在组合概念范畴效应中的作用
The Role of Feature Types in Category Effect of Combined Concepts
查看参考文献19篇
|
文摘
|
组合概念范畴效应是指,人们解释不同范畴组合概念的策略存在差异.本研究通过特征列举实验和建构路径模型,检验概念的特征类型在组合概念范畴效应中的作用.特征列举实验的结果表明,生物的实体特征比率高于人造物,而人造物的情境特征比率高于生物.路径分析的结果表明:⑴修饰词的实体特征比率显著影响属性解释比率,修饰词具有较多实体特征的组合概念得到属性解释的比率较高;⑵主名词的情境特征比率对关系解释比率的影响不显著;⑶将特征类型引入路径模型后,范畴对解释策略的影响依然显著.因此,范畴间的特征类型差异会影响组合概念范畴效应,但还存在其他影响因素有待进一步研究. |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Category effect of combined concept is defined that the interpretations of interpret combined concepts from different category are different. The present study justified the role of feature types of sub-concepts in category effect of combined concept by using feature listing experiment and path model. The results of feature listing experiment showed that living things had more entity features, whereas artifacts had more situation features. The results of path analysis showed that: (a) Entity features of modifiers influenced property interpretation rates significantly, (b) but situation features of head nouns had no significant influence on relation interpretation rates, and (c) category still significantly influenced interpre-tation rates after feature types entered the path model. The difference between feature types of living things and artifacts might not be the only factor that causes category effect on inteipretation of conceptual combination, and more factors should be investigated in future. |
|
来源
|
心理学报
,2005,37(4):450-457 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
组合概念
;
解释策略
;
范畴效应
;
特征类型
;
路径模型
|
|
地址
|
中国科学院心理研究所, 脑与认知科学国家重点实验室, 北京, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
ISSN
|
0439-755X |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
国家973计划
;
国家自然科学基金重点项目
;
中国科学院心理研究所知识创新工程重点项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:2015819
|
参考文献 共
19
共1页
|
|
1.
Solomon K O. Concepts do more than categorize.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences,1999,3(3):99-105
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Wisniewski E J. Construal and similarity in conceptual combination.
Journal of Memory and Language,1996,35(3):434-453
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Wisniewski E J. Relations versus Properties in conceptual combination.
Journal of Memory and Language,1998,38(2):177-202
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Bock J S. The role of salience in conceptual combination.
Memory & Cognition,2000,28(8):1378-1386
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
刘烨. 中文新异组合概念的解释及影响因素.
心理学报,2004,36(3):265-273
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Warrington E K. Category specific semantic impairments.
Brain,1984,107:829-854
|
CSCD被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Farah M J. Modality specificity and emergent category specificity.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,1991,120(4):339-357
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
McRae K. Factors underlying category-specific semantic deficits.
Category specificity in brain and mind,2002:211-249
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Santos L R. A developmental and comparative perspective on category-specific deficits.
Category Specificity in Brain and Mind,2002:1-23
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Sartori G. A case of domain-specific semantic deficit.
Category Specificity in Brain and Mind,2002:25-49
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Medin D L. Are there kinds of concepts? Annual Review of Psychology.
Annual Review of Psychology,2000,51:121-147
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Caramazza A. The animate-inanimate distinction.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,1998,10(1):1-34
|
CSCD被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
语言教学研究所. 语言教学研究所.
现代汉语频率词典,1986
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Gagné C L. Influence of Thematic Relations on the Comprehension of Modifier-Noun Combinations.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognitio,1997,23(1):71-87
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
郭志刚. 社会统计分析方法--SPSS软件应用.
社会统计分析方法--SPSS软件应用,1999:145-176
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Gagné C L. Implications for stimulus class formation and class expansion.
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,2002,78(3):551-565
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Wisniewski E J. Spatial alignment in conceptual combination.
Journal of Memory and Language,2002,46(1):1-23
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Costello F J. Constraint-guided conceptual combination.
Cognitive Science,2000,24(2):299-349
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Costello F J. Alignment versus diagnosticity in the comprehension and production of combined concepts.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,2001,27(1):255-271
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问