社会—生态系统适应性治理研究进展与展望
Study on adaptive governance of social-ecological system: Progress and prospect
查看参考文献56篇
文摘
|
社会—生态系统(SES)由社会子系统、生态子系统及两者的交互作用构成,具有不同于社会系统或生态系统单独具有的结构、功能和复杂特征。社会—生态系统适应性治理旨在通过适应性的社会权利分配与行为决策机制,使社会—生态系统能够在动态条件下可持续地保障人类福祉。适应性治理理论的形成受到“公共池塘资源管理”“韧性”和“治理”3方面理论的影响,并为“转型治理”与“协作治理”提供了建构基础。该理论具有以下3个主要目的:①理解和应对社会—生态系统多稳态、非线性、不确定性、整体性以及复杂性;②建立非对抗性的社会结构、权利分配制度以及行为决策体系,匹配社会子系统与自然子系统;③通过综合方法管理生态系统,使其可持续提供生态系统服务。因此,面对人类行为主导地表过程的“人类世”,实现适应性治理有助于应对社会—生态系统的复杂性与不确定性。鉴于中国的生态环境正处于迅速变化时期,且中国与世界各国间的相互影响日益复杂,未来研究可重点关注以下3个方面: ①理解耦合系统的多元互动过程,增强适应能力;②强调社会—生态系统的整体性研究;③提高环境变化背景下理解和预测系统动态的能力。 |
其他语种文摘
|
Social- Ecological System (SES) is composed of social subsystem, ecological subsystem and the interaction between them; its structure, functions, and characteristics are different from those of social subsystem or ecological subsystem alone. Relying on adaptive social mechanisms of power- sharing and decision making, the adaptive governance of SES aims to guarantee human well- being in a sustainable manner under dynamic conditions. Adaptive governance theory is influenced by "common pool resources management", "resilience" and "governance", and lays a foundation for the construction of transformative governance and collaborative governance. This theory has three main objectives: (1) understanding and coping with the multi- stability, nonlinearity, uncertainty, integrity and complexity of SES; (2) establishing non- confrontational social structure, power- sharing structure and decision- making structure, and match with social subsystem and ecological subsystem; (3) achieving sustainable management of ecosystem services through an integrated approach. Therefore, in the face of the "Anthropocene" of human-behaviour-dominant surface processes, achieving adaptive governance helps to deal with the complexity and uncertainty of SES. Given the rapid changes in China's environment and the increasingly complicated interactions between China and countries all over the world, it will be helpful for future studies to pay close attention to the following fields: (1) understand the multi-interaction processes of a coupled system, and enhance its adaptability; (2) emphasize the significance of a holistic approach of studying SES; (3) improve the ability to understand and predict system dynamics in the context of environmental change. |
来源
|
地理学报
,2019,74(11):2401-2410 【核心库】
|
DOI
|
10.11821/dlxb201911015
|
关键词
|
适应性治理
;
社会—生态系统
;
自组织
;
韧性管理
;
可持续性
|
地址
|
1.
北京师范大学地理科学学部, 地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室, 北京, 100875
2.
西北农林科技大学经济管理学院, 杨凌, 712100
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
0375-5444 |
基金
|
国家重点研发计划
;
国家自然科学基金项目
;
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6597024
|
参考文献 共
56
共3页
|
1.
Vitousek P M. Human domination of earth's ecosystems.
Science,1997,2277(5325):494-499
|
CSCD被引
422
次
|
|
|
|
2.
Liu J. Coupled human and natural systems.
Ambio,2007,36(8):639-649
|
CSCD被引
20
次
|
|
|
|
3.
Glaser M. Human/nature interaction in the anthropocene potential of social-ecological systems analysis.
GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society,2008,17(1):77-80
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Leslie H M. Operationalizing the social-ecological systems framework to assess sustainability.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2015,112(19):5979-5984
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Levin S. Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems: Modeling and policy implications.
Environment and Development Economics,2013,18(2):111-132
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Ostrom E. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems.
Science,2009,325(5939):419-422
|
CSCD被引
151
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Folke C. Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability.
Ecology and Society,2010,15(4):20
|
CSCD被引
56
次
|
|
|
|
8.
Walker B H. Resilience management in social-ecological systems: A working hypothesis for a participatory approach.
Conservation Ecology,2002,6(1):14
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
9.
Boyd J. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units.
Ecological Economics,2007,63(2/3):616-626
|
CSCD被引
123
次
|
|
|
|
10.
Nassl M. Ecosystem services in coupled social-ecological systems: Closing the cycle of service provision and societal feedback.
Ambio,2015,44(8):737-749
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
11.
Rockstrom J. A safe operating space for humanity.
Nature,2009,461(7263):472-475
|
CSCD被引
151
次
|
|
|
|
12.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.
Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis,2005
|
CSCD被引
148
次
|
|
|
|
13.
Chaffin B C. A decade of adaptive governance scholarship: Synthesis and future directions.
Ecology and Society,2014,19(3):56
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
14.
Folke C. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems.
Annual Review of Environment and Resources,2005,30(1):441-473
|
CSCD被引
46
次
|
|
|
|
15.
Brunner R D.
Adaptive Governance: Integrating Science, Policy, and Decision Making,2005
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
16.
Garmestani A S. A framework for resilience-based governance of social-ecological systems.
Ecology and Society,2013,18(1):9
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
17.
Hardin G. Extensions of "the tragedy of the commons".
Science,1998,280(5364):682-683
|
CSCD被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
18.
Wang S. Ecosystem services management: An integrated approach.
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,2013,5(1):11-15
|
CSCD被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
19.
Ostrom E.
Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources,1994
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
20.
Ostrom E. A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2007,104(39):15181-15187
|
CSCD被引
27
次
|
|
|
|
|