根田鼠气味识别的性二型
Sexual Dimorphism of Odoural Discrimination in Root Voles
查看参考文献29篇
|
文摘
|
以新鲜尿和粪作气味源,在行为选择箱中观察根田鼠的行为识别模式,结果表明:雌鼠对陌生同性尿、粪气味源行为识别的差异不显著,雄鼠对陌生同性尿、粪气味源的行为识别在多个指标上存在显著差异;根田鼠对陌生异性尿、粪的行为响应模式无明显差异;除嗅舔时间外,雌、雄鼠对粪气味的行为识别在其他指标上不存在明显差异;比较雌、雄鼠对尿刺激的行为识别发现,雄鼠对尿刺激的访问频次和反标记显著大于雌鼠,雌性嗅舔时间显著大于雄性,其他方面二者之间并无显著差异.因此,雌、雄性根田鼠对粪气味的行为识别模式不存在性别差异;对尿气味的行为识别模式存在性别差异. |
|
其他语种文摘
|
The behavioral discrimination to fresh urine and feces of root voles ( Microtus oeconomiis) was investigated in a behavioral choice maze. The results showed that: (1) There were no significant difference between odor discrimination to urine and feces in female root voles. There were significant differences between odor discrimination to urine and feces in males. (2) There was no signficant difference in odoral discrimination of root voles between urine and feces of strange opposite sex. (3) Except for sniff / lick time, there were no signficant difference on odor discrimination to feces between males and females. (4) By comparison of odor dis-crimination to urine between males and females found that, the visit frequency and counter-marking of males to urine were significantly more than females, and females spent more time sniffing / licking opposite-sex voles than males did, even there were no significant differences in other aspects. The results indicated that there was no sexual difference in odor discrimination to feces and there were sexual differences in odor discrimination to urine between males and females. |
|
来源
|
兽类学报
,2004,24(4):315-321 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
根田鼠
;
气味源
;
行为识别模式
;
性别差异
;
性二型
|
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院西北高原生物研究所, 西宁, 810001
2.
中国农业大学, 设施农业生物环境工程农业部重点实验室, 北京, 100083
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1000-1050 |
|
学科
|
动物学 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金资助项目
;
中国科学院知识创新工程项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:1792690
|
参考文献 共
29
共2页
|
|
1.
Müller-Schwarze D. Scent glands in mammals and their function [A].
Advances in the study of mammalian behavior.Special Publication No.7,1983:150-197
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Brown R E. The rodents.
Social Odours in Mammals,Vol.1,1985
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Ferkin M H. Meadow voles.
Anim Behav,1995,49:37-44
|
CSCD被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Smith B A. Block M L.
Anim Behav,1990,39:512-521
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Shanas U. Mole-rat Harderian gland secretions inhibit aggression [J].
Anim Behav,1997:1255-1263
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Ferkin M H. Evidence for the co-evolution of signals and response mechanisms [J].
Ethology,1995,100:89-98
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Lai S C. Individual odors in Djungarian hamsters (Phodopus campbelli) [J].
Ethology,1994,96:117-126
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Halpin Z T. Origins and function [J].
Adv Study Behav,1986,16:40-70
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Lai S C. evidence for an across-odor code [J].
Horm Beha,1996,30:26-36
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
张立. 非繁殖期成年雄性布氏田鼠对群体气味的辨别.
兽类学报,1996,16(3):285-290
|
CSCD被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Rozenfeld F F. Odour cue recognition by male bank voles.
Anim Behav,1991,41:839-850
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Galea L A M. Sexually dimorphic spatial learning varies seasonally in two populations of deer mice [J].
Brain Research,1994,635(1/2):18-26
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Ferkin M H. Self-grooming as a sexually dimorphic communicative behaviour in meadow voles.
Anim Behav,1996,51(4):801-810
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Perrot-Sinal T S. effects of exposure to fox odor [J].
Behav Nurosci,1996,110(5):1126-1132
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
尹峰. 布氏田鼠的择偶行为.
动物学报,1998,44(2):162-169
|
CSCD被引
20
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
赵亚军. 青春期雌性根田鼠初次择偶行为与雄性优势等级.
动物学报,2003,49(3):303-309
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Zhao Y J. Familiarity and mate choice in root voles (Microtus oeconomus) [J].
Acta Theriol Sin,1999,19(4):288-297
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
赵亚军. 田鼠社会组织、亲属识别和近交回避 [D].
田鼠社会组织、亲属识别和近交回避(博士后出站报告),1999
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
赵亚军. 熟悉性对棕色田鼠和根田鼠择偶行为的影响.
动物学报,2002,48(2):167-174
|
CSCD被引
17
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
张立. 布氏田鼠在不同光周期下对陌生个体尿液和粪便的气味辨别.
兽类学报,2001,21(4):292-300
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问