基于活动的拼车通勤行为及效用均衡分析
Activity-based carpool commuting behavior and utility equilibrium analysis
查看参考文献18篇
文摘
|
本文构建了基于活动的拼车通勤模型,考虑通勤者可选择自驾、拼车司机和拼车乘客三种出行角色,即选择两种出行方式:自驾和拼车,研究早高峰通勤过程的动态用户均衡问题.在活动链中,假设通勤者在家和工作地都会产生效用.同时,将拼车障碍成本,其它货币成本和费用补偿成本引入通勤模型.高峰期内,通勤者可通过出发时间选择和出行模式选择,实现其出行效用的最大化.在用户均衡状态下,每类通勤者都不能通过单方面改变自己的行为选择而使其出行效用变得更大.此外,本文从消除排队的角度出发,推导了系统最优下的动态收费用户均衡.最后,通过一个数值算例对本文的结论进行验证和分析. |
其他语种文摘
|
This paper presents an activity-based commuting model to study the dynamic user equilibrium during morning rush hour commuting. In this model, commuters can use three travel roles: Self-drive, carpool driver and carpool passenger, i.e., two travel modes: Self-drive and carpool. In the chain of activities, it is assumed that the commuter generates utility both at home and at work. Moreover, the extra carpool cost, other monetary cost and compensation cost are introduced into the commuting model. During the peak period, commuters maximize their travel utility by choosing the departure time and travel mode. Under user equilibrium, each traveler cannot make their travel utility greater by unilaterally changing their behavior choices. Furthermore, from the perspective of eliminating the queuing delay, this paper deduces the optimal time-varying toll. Finally, a numerical example is conducted to analyze the theory conclusions. |
来源
|
系统工程理论与实践
,2021,41(6):1496-1506 【核心库】
|
DOI
|
10.12011/SETP2020-3085
|
关键词
|
通勤模型
;
活动效用
;
拼车
;
用户均衡
|
地址
|
北京交通大学经济管理学院, 北京, 100044
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1000-6788 |
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
基金
|
国家自然科学基金
;
中央高校基本科研业务费
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:7010696
|
参考文献 共
18
共1页
|
1.
Xiao L L. On the morning commute with carpooling behavior under parking space constraint.
Transportation Research Part B,2016,91(1):383-407
|
CSCD被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
2.
Agatz N.
Sustainable passenger transportation: Dynamic ride-sharing,2010
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
3.
Wang X.
Optimizing ride matches for dynamic ride-sharing systems,2013
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Guasch A. Simulation analysis of a dynamic ridesharing model.
Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference,2014:1965-1976
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Herbawi W. The ridematching problem with time windows in dynamic ridesharing: A model and a genetic algorithm.
Congress on Evolutionary Computation,2012:1-8
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Xu H. Complementarity models for traffic equilibrium with ridesharing.
Transportation Research Part B,2015,81:161-182
|
CSCD被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Liu Y. Pricing scheme design of ridesharing program in morning commute problem.
Transportation Research Part C,2017,79:156-177
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
8.
Vickrey W S. Congestion theory and transport investment.
American Economic Review,1969,59(2):251-260
|
CSCD被引
36
次
|
|
|
|
9.
Arnott R. The welfare effects of congestion tolls with heterogeneous commuters.
Journal of Transport Economics & Policy,1994,28(2):139-161
|
CSCD被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
10.
Lindsey R. Existence, uniqueness, and trip cost function properties of user equilibrium in the bottleneck model with multiple user classes.
Transportation Science,2004,38(3):293-314
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
11.
Van Den Berg V. Winning or losing from dynamic bottleneck congestion pricing?: The distributional effects of road pricing with heterogeneity in values of time and schedule delay.
Journal of Public Economics,2011,95(7/8):983-992
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
12.
郭晓. 基于瓶颈模型的异质出行者早高峰出行问题研究.
系统工程理论与实践,2018,38(4):1003-1012
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
13.
Liu Y. A semi-analytical approach for solving the bottleneck model with general user heterogeneity.
Transportation Research Part B: Methodological,2015,71:56-70
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
14.
Jia Z. Traffic managements for household travels in congested morning commute.
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review,2016:173-189
|
CSCD被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
15.
Li Z C. Fifty years of the bottleneck model: A bibliometric review and future research directions.
Transportation Research Part B: Methodological,2020,139:311-342
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
16.
邓瑶. 基于活动的瓶颈模型和收费机制:研究进展评述.
系统工程理论与实践,2020,40(8):2076-2089
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
17.
李志纯. 基于活动方法的瓶颈模型与拥挤收费问题研究.
管理科学学报,2017,20(8):93-101
|
CSCD被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
18.
Litman T. Transportation cost and benefit analysis: Techniques, estimates and implications.
Victoria Transport Policy Institute,2009,115(2):269-272
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|