环境规制、地方保护与中国污染密集型产业布局
Environmental regulation, local protection and the spatial distribution of pollution-intensive industries in China
查看参考文献41篇
|
文摘
|
污染密集型产业在促进区域经济增长的同时会对区域生态环境带来巨大威胁,其发展布局会受到地方保护和环境规制的双重影响。1980-2014年中国污染密集型产业的发展经历了缓慢增长、快速扩张和结构转型3个阶段,总体呈现“分散—集中—分散”的空间特征,中部省份是现阶段承接污染密集型产业转移的主要地区。通过建立区域属性模型、区域—产业交互项模型,定量分析环境规制、地方保护对污染密集型产业布局空间变化的影响,检验“污染避难所假说”和“波特假说”,发现环境规制和地方保护已成为污染密集型产业布局的重要影响因素,但存在显著的产业异质性和区域差异性;污染程度高的产业易受到环境规制的影响;相比高税收产业,高国有比重的产业更易受到地方的保护;环境规制和地方保护作为两种相反的力量,彼此之间相互抑制;环境规制的作用在东部地区比较突出,而中、西部地区地方保护的作用更为明显。为防止中西部地区成为污染密集型产业的“避难所”,应因地因时制宜制定差异化政策,促进经济与环境保护的协调发展。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Pollution- intensive industries can promote regional economic growth. They also pose a great threat to regional environmental system. Polluting industries may be protected by regional policies due to their contribution to economic growth, but the local governments may also impose some restrictions and controls on them by means of the environmental regulations. From 1980 to 2014, the development period of pollution- intensive industries in China can be divided into three stages: slow growth, rapid expansion, and structural transition. The spatial distribution of pollution industries changed from dispersal to concentration and then to decentralization. The central provinces such as Henan, Hubei, Hunan and Jiangxi have become the major areas of pollution-intensive industries transfer. By establishing the regional attribute model and the regional- industrial interaction model, this paper quantitatively analyzes the influence of environmental regulation and local protection on the spatial distribution of the pollution- intensive industries in China during 2001- 2014, and tests whether there exist the pollution haven hypothesis and the Porter hypothesis. Environmental regulation and local protection are important factors that influence the spatial distribution of polluting industries, but there exists obvious industrial and regional heterogeneity. Industries with a high degree of pollution are more likely to be affected by environmental regulations, and industries with high share of state ownership are more likely to be protected by local governments. Environmental regulation and local protection are two opposite forces, which have the effect of mutual inhibition and weakening. The roles of environmental regulation and local protection in coastal and inland areas have significant differences. The effect of environmental regulation is more prominent in eastern China, while that of local protection in central and western China is more significant. In order to prevent the central and western regions from being the "pollution haven" and to realize the win- win between economic growth and environmental protection, a differentiated policy should be formulated according to local conditions and the development stage. |
|
来源
|
地理学报
,2018,73(10):1954-1969 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.11821/dlxb201810010
|
|
关键词
|
污染密集型产业
;
环境规制
;
地方保护
;
产业布局
|
|
地址
|
1.
河南大学黄河文明与可持续发展研究中心, 暨黄河文明传承与现代文明建设河南省协同创新中心, 开封, 475001
2.
河南大学环境与规划学院, 开封, 475004
3.
河南大学国际教育学院, 开封, 475001
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
0375-5444 |
|
学科
|
环境保护管理 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金重点项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6348990
|
参考文献 共
41
共3页
|
|
1.
贺灿飞.
环境经济地理研究,2016:37-47
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Zheng D. Multiple environmental policies and pollution haven hypothesis: Evidence from China's polluting industries.
Journal of Cleaner Production,2017,141:295-304
|
CSCD被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
祁毓. 中国环境分权体制改革研究:制度变迁、数量测算与效应评估.
中国工业经济,2014(1):31-43
|
CSCD被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
彭文斌. 政府行为偏好与环境规制效果.
社会科学,2016(5):33-41
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
张征宇. 地方环境支出的实证研究.
经济研究,2010(5):82-94
|
CSCD被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Walter I. Environmental policies in developing countries.
Ambio,1979:102-109
|
CSCD被引
47
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Chung S. Environmental regulation and foreign direct investment: Evidence from South Korea.
Journal of Development Economics,2014,108(C):222-236
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Ramanathan R. Environmental regulations, innovation and firm performance: A revisit of the Porter hypothesis.
Journal of Cleaner Production,2016,155:79-92
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
沈静. 环境管制影响下的佛山陶瓷产业区位变动机制.
地理学报,2012,67(4):467-478
|
CSCD被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
原毅军. 环境规制与经济增长:基于经济型规制分类的研究.
经济评论,2013(1):27-33
|
CSCD被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
张平. 不同类型环境规制对企业技术创新影响比较研究.
中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(4):8-13
|
CSCD被引
23
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
周沂. 中国污染密集型产业地理分布研究.
自然资源学报,2015,30(7):1183-1196
|
CSCD被引
22
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Shen J. The impact of environmental regulations on the location of pollution-intensive industries in China.
Journal of Cleaner Production,2017,148:785-794
|
CSCD被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
仇方道. 江苏省污染密集型产业空间转移及影响因素.
地理科学,2013,33(7):789-796
|
CSCD被引
32
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
崔建鑫. 长江三角洲地区污染密集型产业转移及驱动机理.
地理研究,2015,34(3):504-512
|
CSCD被引
23
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
孙早. 市场化程度,地方保护主义与R&D的溢出效应:来自中国工业的经验证据.
管理世界,2014(8):78-89
|
CSCD被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Weingast B R. The economic role of political institutions: Market-preserving federalism and economic development.
Journal of Law Economics & Organization,1995,11(1):1-31
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
杨其静. 保护市场的联邦主义及其批判.
经济研究,2008(3):99-114
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
周黎安. 中国地方官员的晋升锦标赛模式研究.
经济研究,2007(7):36-50
|
CSCD被引
226
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Bai C E. Local protectionism and regional specialization: Evidence from China's industries.
Journal of International Economics,2004,63(2):397-417
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问