帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

流调中心抑郁量表在老年人群中的因素结构
Factor Structures of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale among Elderly Adults

查看参考文献23篇

张宝山 1   李娟 2 *  
文摘 本研究使用4903名老年人组成的全国样本,系统地检验了流调中心抑郁量表的因素结构。结果表明,Radloff的四因素结构、Guarnaccia等和Yen等的三因素结构对当前样本数据的拟合较好,但信度分析和相关分析显示积极情绪因素降低了总量表信度,并且与其他因素之间不支持共同的高阶因素(抑郁),基于此,在使用量表合成总分的背景下,4个积极情绪项目不适合包含在CES-D量表中。随后,本研究检验了剔除积极情绪项目后量表各因素结构的拟合情况,发现积极情绪因素对量表因素结构的拟合水平贡献不大。结合拟合指数和Radloff对量表的界定,16项目的三因素结构最适合于我国老年人群,并且,这一因素结构在老年人群中具有跨性别的恒等性。
其他语种文摘 Objectives;The Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale(CES-D) is a self - rating scale for measuring depressive symptoms in community settings.It is commonly used as a screening instrument for potential depression.Factor analytic studies have shown that the 20 items of CES-D represent depressed affect,positive affect(reversed items),somatic complaints,and interpersonal concerns(Radloff,1977).Although it is one of the most commonly used questionnaires,limited studies have focused on the factor structure of the CES-D among the groups of Chinese elderly adults.The objective of the present study was to examine the factor structure of CES-D in Chinese elderly populations.Method;The CES-D was assessed,based on a national sample of 4903 elderly adults,who were recruited from major Chinese mainland cities.Results;a) Confirmatory factor analysis for 20 items of CES-D demonstrated that the four-factor structure identified by Radloff(1977),as well as two three-factor structures suggested by Cuamaccia et al.(1989) and Yen et al.(2000),fitted the present data with RMSEA<0.08,SRMR<0.08,NNFI>0.90,GFI>0.90,and AGFI>0.90,as well as CFI>0.95,which indicated that these factor structures could be replicated in the Chinese elderly population;b) the correlations between the positive affect factor,which consist of four reverse scoring items,and the other factors were too low to support a common higher -order factor the range of rs was from 0.35 to 0.46,which was smaller than the cut-off value of.50;c),under the conditions that the total score was used to indicate individuals’ levels of depressive symptoms,the four items of positive affect should not be included in the CES-D.In the following analyses,we tried to test the factor structure of CES-D positive factor,and found that the positive affect factor only made limited contributions to the model fit.Combining both original definition and fit indices,Radloff’ s factor structure was chosen as the most suitable structure for CES-D,which consisted of the remaining 16 items,RMSEA =.067,SRMR =.033,CFI =. 98,NNFI =.98,and GFI =.94;d) measurement invariance was established across gender for the factor structure of the remaining 16 items.Conclusion;a) Among Chinese elderly adults,the CES - D may provide a better measure of depressive symptoms as a 16-item scale excluding the positive affect factor;and b) the factor structure,identified by Radloff,fit the 16-item scale.
来源 心理科学 ,2012,35(4):993-998 【核心库】
关键词 流调中心抑郁量表 ; 因素结构 ; 老年人
地址

1. 陕西师范大学心理学院, 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室, 西安, 710062  

2. 中国科学院心理研究所老年心理研究中心, 中国科学院心理健康院重点实验室, 北京, 100101

语种 中文
ISSN 1671-6981
学科 社会科学总论
基金 国家自然科学基金 ;  国家科技支撑计划项目 ;  中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目 ;  中国博士后科学基金 ;  中科院心理所青年基金项目
文献收藏号 CSCD:4653919

参考文献 共 23 共2页

1.  侯杰泰. 结构方程模型及其应用,2004 CSCD被引 322 次    
2.  孟琛. 北京老年人的抑郁状况调查及CES—D的结构分析. 中国心理卫生杂志,1997,11(1):55-58 CSCD被引 14 次    
3.  邱皓政. 结构方程模型的原理与应用,2009 CSCD被引 40 次    
4.  辛涛. CES—D的结构分析及其在成年人的试用. 中国临床心理学杂志,1997,5(001):14-16 CSCD被引 10 次    
5.  章婕. 流调中心抑郁量表全国城市常模的建立. 中国心理卫生杂志,2010,24(2):139-143 CSCD被引 156 次    
6.  Byrne B M. Factor analytic models: Viewing the structure of an assessment instrument from three perspectives. Journal of personality assessment,2005,85(1):17-32 CSCD被引 4 次    
7.  Chen F F. Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,2007,14(3):464-504 CSCD被引 21 次    
8.  Chen F F. Teacher s Corner: Testing Measurement Invariance of Second - Order Factor Models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,2005,12(3):471-492 CSCD被引 4 次    
9.  Cheung G W. Evaluating goodness - of - fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,2002,9(2):233-255 CSCD被引 81 次    
10.  Cortina J M. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of applied psychology,1993,78(1):98-104 CSCD被引 10 次    
11.  Cronbach L J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika,1951,16(3):297-334 CSCD被引 79 次    
12.  Eid M. Norms for Experiencing Emotions in Different Cultures: Inter - and Intranational Differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2001,81(5):869-885 CSCD被引 5 次    
13.  Guarnaccia P J. The factor structure of the CES - D in the Hispanic Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: The influences of ethnicity, gender and language. Social Science & Medicine,1989,29(1):85-94 CSCD被引 3 次    
14.  Lam T H. Depressive symptoms among Hong Kong adolescents: Relation to atypical sexual feelings and behaviors, gender dissatisfaction, pubertal timing, and family and peer relationships. Archives of sexual behavior,2004,33(5):487-496 CSCD被引 2 次    
15.  Lee S W. Factor Structure of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale in Hong Kong Adolescents. Journal of personality assessment,2008,90(2):175-184 CSCD被引 3 次    
16.  Lewinsohn P M. Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES - D) as a screening instrument for depression among community - residing older adults. Psychology and aging,1997,12(2):277-287 CSCD被引 10 次    
17.  MacCallum R C. Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin,1992,111(3):490-504 CSCD被引 9 次    
18.  Radloff L S. The CES - D scale: A self - report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied psychological measurement,1977,1(3):385-401 CSCD被引 236 次    
19.  Sheehan T J. The measurement structure of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale. Journal of Personality Assessment,1995,64(3):507-521 CSCD被引 1 次    
20.  Shevlin M. Alternative factor models and factorial invariance of the GHQ - 12: a large sample analysis using confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological assessment,2005,17(2):231-236 CSCD被引 4 次    
引证文献 5 篇

1 张娜 流调中心抑郁量表在农村女性中的因素结构和信效度 四川大学学报. 医学版,2014,45(5):827-830,841
CSCD被引 3 次

2 郭丽娜 中文版抑郁认知量表在老年人群中应用的信效度研究 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2016,25(1):86-89
CSCD被引 2 次

显示所有5篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护：中国科学院文献情报中心
地址：北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码：100190 联系电话：(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号