帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

跨情境下集群行为的动因机制
The Motivation Mechanism of Collective Action in Different Contexts

查看参考文献120篇

张书维 1   王二平 2 *   周洁 2  
文摘 群体性事件是当下我国典型的集群行为。本研究通过实验室情景设计的方法,考察了跨情境下群体相对剥夺如何通过群体认同作用于集群行为,及群体愤怒和群体效能对集群行为的影响。结果表明:1)同一触发情境下,群体认同调节群体相对剥夺-集群行为(意向)之间的关系。一般群体认同凸显的个体在高群体相对剥夺水平下有更强烈的集群行为参与(意向)。这源自群体认同对群体相对剥夺不同水平下群体效能与集群行为意向之间的二次调节。对于特定群体认同凸显的个体,无论群体相对剥夺水平的高低,都有较高的集群行为参与(意向)。这当中,群体愤怒起到了部分中介的作用。2)不同触发情境下,群体认同对群体相对剥夺与集群行为意向的调节作用出现差异。该调节作用仅出现在利益无关情境中。此外,群体愤怒与群体效能对集群行为意向的影响在不同情境下有区别:在利益无关情境中,群体愤怒的影响显著大于群体效能;在利益相关情境中,群体效能与群体愤怒的影响无显著差异。本研究扩展了集群行为的双路径模型,并为政府预防和化解群体性事件提供思路。
其他语种文摘 As the representation of social contradictions,collective action in China typically involves mass incidents which refer to the conflicts between certain civilians and local administration.A group member engages in collective action any time that he or she acts as a representative of a group and when the action is directed at improving the conditions for the entire group.This research,consisting of two experiments,focused on the motivation mechanism underlying collective action in different incident contexts (i.e.,instrumental vs.non-instrumental) which were manipulated by using scenarios.The main purpose of this study was to investigate the moderating roles of group identity and incident contexts in the relationship between group relative deprivation and collective action.Moreover,the present study also explored the effects of group-based anger and group efficacy on collective action.The results indicated that: First,regardless of incident context,group identity moderated the relation between group relative deprivation and collective action (or collective action intention).Specifically,when general group identity (i.e.,identity with undergraduates) was salient,individuals with high general group identity were more likely to participate in collective action because group identity moderated the relation between group efficacy and collective action intention at different levels of group relative deprivation.That is,in the high group relative deprivation condition,when general group identity was salient,participants’ collective action intention increased as their group efficacy increased;while in the low group relative deprivation condition,group identity did not have a moderating effect.However,when special group identity (i.e.,identity with undergraduates at a certain university) was salient,participants were very likely to engage in collective action and collective action intention increased regardless of group relative deprivation condition.In this process,group-based anger partially mediated the moderating effect of group identity on the relationship between group relative deprivation and collective action intention.Second,incident context moderated the relation between group relative deprivation and collective action intention at different levels of group identity.Specifically,in the non-instrumental incident context,when general group identity was salient,participants’ collective action intention was better predicted by group relative deprivation;whereas in the instrumental incident context,participants with high group relative deprivation were more likely to engage in collective action than those with low group relative deprivation despite of the nonsignificant difference.In addition,group-based anger predicted collective action intention more strongly than group efficacy in the non-instrumental incident context.Nevertheless,group-based anger and group efficacy exerted equal impact on collective action intention in the instrumental incident context.An important theoretical implication of this study is that it extends the dual-pathway model of collective action in different incident contexts at distinct levels of group relative deprivation.Furthermore,the current study provides a useful experimental paradigm involving the successful manipulation of incident contexts in the lab.Regarding practical implications,this research examines the social psychological mechanism underlying collective action in China by examining motivation,thus informing administrators and policy makers on how to monitor and reduce mass incidents in response to public administration.
来源 心理学报 ,2012,44(4):524-545 【核心库】
关键词 群体相对剥夺 ; 群体认同 ; 利益相关触发情境 ; 利益无关触发情境 ; 集群行为
地址

1. 中山大学中国公共管理研究中心、政治与公共事务管理学院, 广州, 510275  

2. 中国科学院心理研究所, 北京, 100101

语种 中文
ISSN 0439-755X
学科 社会科学总论
基金 中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目 ;  国家自然科学基金重点项目
文献收藏号 CSCD:4524457

参考文献 共 120 共6页

1.  Abeles R P. Relative deprivation, rising expectations, and black militancy. Journal of Social Issues,1976,32:119-137 CSCD被引 2 次    
2.  Abrams D. Political identity: Relative deprivation, social identity and the case of Scottish nationalism (Initiative Occasion No. 24),1990 CSCD被引 1 次    
3.  Ajzen I. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior,1980 CSCD被引 46 次    
4.  Albarracin D. Elaborative and Nonelaborative processing of a behavior-related communication. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,2001,27(6):691-705 CSCD被引 1 次    
5.  Bandura A. Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies. Self-efficacy in changing societies,1995:1-45 CSCD被引 3 次    
6.  Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control,1997 CSCD被引 82 次    
7.  Branscomble N R. Coping with group-based discrimination: Individualistic versus group-level strategies. Prejudice: The target's perspective,1998:243-266 CSCD被引 1 次    
8.  Brown R. Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology,2000,30:745-778 CSCD被引 13 次    
9.  Brunsting S. Social movement participation in the digital age: Predicting offline and online collective action. Small Group Research,2002,33(5):525-554 CSCD被引 4 次    
10.  陈浩. 集群行为诸相关概念分类新框架. 广西民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）,2010,32(6):56-60 CSCD被引 2 次    
11.  Cohen J. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.),2002 CSCD被引 1 次    
12.  Crawford T J. Relative deprivation, powerlessness, and militancy: The psychology of social protest. Psychiatry,1970,33:208-223 CSCD被引 2 次    
13.  De La Sablonniere R. Relative deprivation and social identity in Times of dramatic social change: The case of nurses. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,2008,38(9):2293-2314 CSCD被引 4 次    
14.  De Weerd M. Group identification and political protest: Farmers' protest in the Netherlands. European Journal of Social Psychology,1999,29:1073-1095 CSCD被引 3 次    
15.  Dion K L. Response to perceived discrimination and relative deprivation. Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 4,1986:159-179 CSCD被引 1 次    
16.  Doosje B. Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,1995,31(5):410-436 CSCD被引 7 次    
17.  Doosje B. Social identity as both cause and effect: The development of group identification in response to anticipated and actual changes in the intergroup status hierarchy. British Journal of Social Psychology,2002,41:57-76 CSCD被引 4 次    
18.  Drury J. Collective action and psychological change: The emergence of new social identities. British Journal of Social Psychology,2000,39:579-604 CSCD被引 4 次    
19.  Drury J. Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology,2005,35:35-38 CSCD被引 10 次    
20.  Dube-Simard L. Relative deprivation and social protest: The personal-group issue. Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 4,1986:201-216 CSCD被引 1 次    
引证文献 17 篇

1 张书维 群际威胁与集群行为意向：群体性事件的双路径模型 心理学报,2013,45(12):1410-1430
CSCD被引 10 次

2 张书维 社会公正与政治信任:民众对政府的合作行为机制 心理科学进展,2014,22(4):588-595
CSCD被引 4 次

显示所有17篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护：中国科学院文献情报中心
地址：北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码：100190 联系电话：(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号