Steinberg父母教养方式问卷中文修订及信、效度评价
Evaluation on reliability and validity of Steinberg Parenting Scale,Chinese revision
查看参考文献8篇
|
文摘
|
目的对Steinberg父母教养方式问卷进行中文版修订和信度及效度检验,为该量表在中国的推广使用提供科学依据。方法使用翻译成中文的Steinberg父母教养方式问卷对河北省保定市的356名中小学生进行初测,并根据项目分析和探索性因素分析的结果甄选项目;修订量表后对7省18个城镇的7 460名中小学生正式施测,评价该量表的信度和效度。结果通过探索性因素分析,确定中文修订的Steinberg父母教养方式问卷由参与、心理自主、严格/监督3个因子共21个条目组成,累积方差解释率为37.9%;验证性因素分析结果表明,3个因子结构对数据的拟合较好(RMSEA=0.051,CFI=0.923,NNFI=0.913);参与、心理自主和严格/监督3个分量表的内部一致性系数分别0.71、0.69和0.71,分半信度系数分别为0.70、0.66和0.65;各因子与总量表的相关系数分别为0.76、0.59和0.54,均>0.50,且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01),表明量表具有较好的信度和效度。结论修订后的中文版Stein-berg父母教养方式问卷具有较好的信度和效度,可应用于中国父母教养方式的研究与实践。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Objective To provide scientific evidence for the general use of the Steinberg Parenting Scale in China and to revise Steinberg Parenting Scale in Chinese and to assess its reliability and validity.Methods Firstly,each item of the scale was translated into Chinese and administered to 356 primary and secondary school students in Baoding city,and then the items of the scale were selected based on the results of item analysis and exploratory factor analysis(EFA).Secondly,formal test was conducted among 7 460 primary and middle school students from 18 cities and towns in 7 provinces to test the validity and reliability of the scale.Results A three-factor model(involvement,psychological autonomy-granting,and strictness/supervision)including 21 items was found in EFA with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 37.9%.The fit indexes in confirmatory factor analyses were as following:root mean square error of approximation(RMSEA)=0.051,comparative fit index(CFI)=0.923,nonnormed fit index(NNFI)=0.913.The Cronbach′s α was 0.71 for involvement,0.69 for psychological autonomy granting,and 0.71 for strictness/supervision,respectively.The split-half index was 0.70 for involvement,0.66 for psychological autonomy granting,and 0.75 for strictness/supervision,respectively.The correlation coefficient between each subscale and total scale was 0.76 for involvement,0.59 for psychological autonomy granting,and 0.54 for strictness/supervision,respectively.Conclusion The results suggest that the Chinese version of Steinberg Parenting Scale has acceptable validity and reliability and can be applied in the study in China. |
|
来源
|
中国公共卫生
,2012,28(4):439-441 【扩展库】
|
|
关键词
|
Steinberg父母教养方式问卷
;
修订
;
中文版
;
信度
;
效度
|
|
地址
|
中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室, 北京, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1001-0580 |
|
学科
|
预防医学、卫生学 |
|
基金
|
国家863计划
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:4513187
|
参考文献 共
8
共1页
|
|
1.
嵇宇虹. 小学生行为问题与父母教养方式的关系.
中国公共卫生,2004,20(2):245-247
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
张斌. 父母教养方式与罪犯人格形成关系.
中国公共卫生,2010,26(8):964-965
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Steinberg L. Impact of parenting practices on adolescent achievement:authoritative parenting,school involvement, and encouragement to succeed.
Child Development,1992,63(5):1266-1281
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Steinberg L. Over-time changes in adjustment and competence among adolescents from authoritative,authoritarian, indulgent,and neglectful families.
Child Development,1994,65(3):754-770
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
邱皓政.
结构方程模型的原理与应用,2009:76
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Marsh H W. An evaluation of incremental fit indices:a clarification of mathematical and empirical properties.
Advanced structural equation modeling.Issues and techniques,1996:315-353
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Finch J F. The investigation of personality structure:statistical models.
Journal of Research in Personality,1997,31(4):439-485
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Mulaik S A. Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models.
Psychological Bulletin,1989,105(3):430-445
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问