The Impact of Cost Sharing on Green Technology Investment in Competing Supply Chains
查看参考文献36篇
|
文摘
|
The investment in green technology in the process of product design and production is viewed as a powerful tool for sustainable development and carbon emission reduction. However, the substantial cost and pressure of competition weaken incentives for manufacturers to engage in green technology. In this paper, we consider two competitive manufacturer-retailer supply chains, where each manufacturer sells partially substitutable products through the exclusive retailer, study green technology investment selection by manufacturers, and examine the efficacy of retailer cost sharing scheme. Our analysis shows that a dominant equilibrium strategy for both manufacturers is to invest in green technologies, whether cost sharing is in place or not. Retailer sharing the cost of manufacturer green technology investment can avoid firms' preference confliction over the green technology investment and improve social welfare simultaneously when both the cost-sharing rate and the degree of product/channel competition are relatively low. We also find that green technology investment by manufacturers does not necessarily curb total carbon emission, and the cost sharing can either strengthen or weaken the carbon emission reduction of green technology investment. |
|
来源
|
Journal of Systems Science and Information
,2022,10(3):216-234 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.21078/JSSI-2022-216-19
|
|
关键词
|
green technology investment
;
cost sharing
;
supply chain competition
;
game theory
|
|
地址
|
1.
School of Economics and Management, Tiangong University, Tianjin, 300387
2.
School of Management, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin, 300384
|
|
语种
|
英文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1478-9906 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论;环境科学基础理论 |
|
基金
|
Supported by the National Social Science Fund of China
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:7249269
|
参考文献 共
36
共2页
|
|
1.
Shi X. Who should invest in clean technologies in a supply chain with competition?.
Journal of Cleaner Production,2019,215:689-700
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Apple Inc.
Apple group annual green bound impact report,2018
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Hong Z. Green product supply chain contracts considering environmental responsibilities.
Omega,2019,83:155-166
|
CSCD被引
41
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Shi X. Economic and environmental performance of fashion supply chain: The joint effect of power structure and sustainable investment.
Sustainability,2017,9:961
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
The Coca-Cola Company.
Annual sustainability reports,2020
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Chen X. Firms' green R& D cooperation behavior in a supply chain: Technological spillover power and coordination.
International Journal of Production Economics,2019,218:118-134
|
CSCD被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Da Silva A. Restrictive factors in implementation of clean technologies in red ceramic industries.
Journal of Cleaner Production,2017,168:441-451
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Wu O. Chain-to-chain competition under demand uncertainty.
Journal of the Operations Research Society of China,2016,4:49-75
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Ghosh D. Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract.
International Journal of Production Economics,2015,164:319-329
|
CSCD被引
85
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Yang H. Retailer-driven carbon emission abatement with consumer environmental awareness and carbon tax: Revenue-sharing versus cost-sharing.
Omega,2018,78:179-191
|
CSCD被引
34
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Li T. Low carbon strategy analysis under revenue-sharing and cost-sharing contracts.
Journal of Cleaner Production,2019,212:1462-1477
|
CSCD被引
20
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Choi T. Local sourcing and fashion quick response system: The impacts of carbon footprint tax.
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review,2013,55:43-54
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Rosic H. The economic and environmental performance of dual sourcing: A newsvendor approach.
International Journal of Production Economics,2013,143(1):109-119
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
He P. Production lot-sizing and carbon emissions under cap-and-trade and carbon tax regulations.
Journal of Cleaner Production,2015,103:241-248
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Dong C. Sustainability investment under cap-and-trade regulation.
Annals of Operations Research,2016,240:509-531
|
CSCD被引
28
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Liu Z. Consumer environmental awareness and competition in two-stage supply chains.
European Journal of Operational Research,2012,218(3):602-613
|
CSCD被引
114
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Zhang L. Consumer environmental awareness and channel coordination with two substitutable products.
European Journal of Operational Research,2015,241(1):63-73
|
CSCD被引
38
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Du S. Low-carbon production with low-carbon premium in cap-and-trade regulation.
Journal of Cleaner Production,2016,152:271-280
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Meng X. Low-carbon product selection with carbon tax and competition: Effects of the power structure.
International Journal of Production Economics,2018,200:224-230
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Zhang X X. Manufacturers' green investment in a competitive market with a common retailer.
Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,276:123164
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问