全球科研论文合作网络的结构异质性及其邻近性机理
Structural heterogeneity and proximity mechanism of global scientific collaboration network based on co-authored papers
查看参考文献66篇
|
文摘
|
以科研论文为媒介的知识合作网络已成为知识溢出的重要通道,但目前学术界对全球科研合作网络结构的复杂性涌现机制缺乏深入的探讨。基于2014年Web of Science核心合集所收录的科研论文合著数据,借助大数据挖掘技术、复杂网络、空间统计和重力模型分析,刻画了全球科研论文合作网络的拓扑结构、空间格局及其邻近性机理。结果发现:①拓扑结构上,形成了以美国为核心的层级网络,具有小世界性和等级层次性,发育出典型的等级“核心—边缘”结构。②空间格局上,以美国、西欧、中国和澳大利亚为顶点的“四边形”成为全球科研论文合作网络的骨架;三大中心性指标值的空间分异明显,强度中心性形成以美国为极核,加拿大、澳大利亚、中国及西欧诸国为次中心的“一超多强”格局,与之类似的介数中心性呈现北美、西欧和东亚“三足鼎立”的形态,度中心性分布则相对均匀,表现出“大分散、小集中”的“多中心—边缘集散”格局。③重力回归分析发现,地理距离抑制了国际科研论文合作,不过其影响力较弱;社会与经济邻近性对全球科研论文合作具有明显的促进作用,语言差异不是国际科研合作交流的障碍。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Despite increasing importance of academic papers in global knowledge flows, the structural disparities and proximity mechanism related to international scientific collaboration network attracted little attention. To fill this gap, based on data mining from Thomson Reuters' Web of Science database in 2014, its heterogeneities in topology and space were portrayed using visualizing tools such as Pajek, Gephi, VOSviewer, and ArcGIS. Topologically, 211 countries and 9928 ties are involved in global scientific collaboration network, but the international network of co- authored relations is mono- centricand dominated by the United States. It exhibits some features of a "small- world" network with the smaller average path length of 1.56 and the extremely large cluster coefficient of 0.73 compared to its counterpart, as well as the better- fitting exponential distribution accumulative nodal degree. In addition, the entire network presents a core- periphery structure with hierarchies, which is composed of 13 core countries and the periphery of 198 countries. Spatially, densely-tied and high-output areas are mainly distributed in four regions: West Europe, North America, East Asia and Australia. Moreover, the spatial heterogeneity is also observed in the distributions of three centralities. Amongst these, the countries with greater strength centrality are mainly concentrated in North America (i.e. the US and Canada), Western Europe (i.e. the UK, France, Germany, Italy and Spain), and China, noticeably in the US, which forms the polarizing pattern with one superpower of the US and great powers such as China and the UK. Similarly, the big three regions consisting of West Europe, North America and Asian- Pacific region have the peak betweenness centrality as well. Slightly different from the two above, the distribution of nodal degree centrality is uneven in the world, although regional agglomeration of high- degree countries is still observed. Last but not least, the proximity factors of its structural inequalities were also verified by correlational analysis, negative binomial regression approach and gravity model of STATA. The findings further confirm that geographical distance has weakened crosscountry scientific collaboration. Meanwhile, socio- economic proximity has a positive impact on cross-country scientific collaboration, while language proximity plays a negative role. |
|
来源
|
地理学报
,2017,72(4):737-752 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.11821/dlxb201704014
|
|
关键词
|
科研论文合作网络
;
结构异质性
;
复杂网络分析
;
重力模型
;
邻近性机制
|
|
地址
|
华东师范大学城市与区域科学学院, 上海, 200241
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
0375-5444 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5964025
|
参考文献 共
66
共4页
|
|
1.
Royal Society.
Knowledge, Networks and Nations: Global Scientific Collaboration in the 21st Century,2011:5-6
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Adams J. Collaborations: The fourth age of research.
Nature,2013,497(7451):557-560
|
CSCD被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Adams J. Comment: A well-connected world.
Nature,2015,527(7577):S58-S59
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Adams J. Collaborations: The rise of research networks.
Nature,2012,490(7420):335-336
|
CSCD被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Breschi S. Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: An anatomy of localized knowledge flows.
Journal of Economic Geography,2009,9(4):439-468
|
CSCD被引
19
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
TerWal A L J. Cluster emergence and network evolution: A longitudinal analysis of the inventor network in Sophia-Antipolis.
Regional Studies,2013,47(5):651-668
|
CSCD被引
18
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Scherngell T. Collaborative knowledge production in China: Regional evidence from a gravity model approach.
Regional Studies,2011,45(6):755-772
|
CSCD被引
33
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Balland P A. Proximity and the evolution of collaboration networks: Evidence from research and development projects within the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) industry.
Regional Studies,2012,46(6):741-756
|
CSCD被引
33
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Scherngell T. Distinct spatial characteristics of industrial and public research collaborations: Evidence from the Fifth EU Framework Programme.
The Annals of Regional Science,2011,46(2):247-266
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Crescenzi R. Do inventors talk to strangers? On proximity and collaborative knowledge creation.
Research Policy,2016,45(1):177-194
|
CSCD被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Broekel T. Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: The proximity paradox.
Journal of Economic Geography,2012,12(2):409-433
|
CSCD被引
42
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Hoekman J. The geography of collaborative knowledge production in Europe.
The Annals of Regional Science,2009,43(3):721-738
|
CSCD被引
26
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
D'Este P. Shaping the formation of university- industry research collaborations: What type of proximity does really matter?.
Journal of Economic Geography,2013,13(4):537-558
|
CSCD被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Balland P A. The dynamics of interfirm networks along the industry life cycle: The case of the global video game industry, 1987-2007.
Journal of Economic Geography,2013,13(5):741-765
|
CSCD被引
23
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
De Prato G. Global technological collaboration network: Network analysis of international co-inventions.
The Journal of Technology Transfer,2014,39(3):358-375
|
CSCD被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Li D. Spatial and temporal evolution of urban innovation network in China.
Habitat International,2015,49:484-496
|
CSCD被引
15
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
李丹丹. 基于不同时空尺度的知识溢出网络结构特征研究.
地理科学,2013,33(10):1180-1187
|
CSCD被引
36
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Leydesdorff L. International collaboration in science: The global map and the network.
El Profesional de la Informacion,2013,22(1):87-95
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Huallachain B O. Urban centers and networks of co-invention in American biotechnology.
Annals of Regional Science,2014,52(3):799-823
|
CSCD被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Cairncross F.
The death of distance: How the communications revolution is changing our lives,2001:24-35
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问