阅读中的注意分配:序列与平行之争
Attention Allocation During Reading: Sequential or Parallel
查看参考文献98篇
|
文摘
|
阅读中的注意分配问题是区分目前占主导地位的两类眼动控制模型的核心因素,基于序列分布假设的眼动控模型与基于平行注意分布的眼动控制模型在对眼动行为的预测中存在一些显著的差异,譬如一次注视下能否深度加工知觉广度内的一个以上词汇的信息。文章围绕两类模型对该问题的不同预测,深入探讨了两类模型的核心差异以及相关实验证据,并概括其它相关领域中在知觉广度内关于序列与平行注意分布的研究,以及对建构中文眼动控制模型的重要意义。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Attention allocation in reading is an essential factor discriminating two major kinds of eye movement control models in reading. These two kinds of models had different assumptions on whether more than one word can be processed simultaneously. One kind of the models assumes that attention is sequentially allocated, thus only completion of previous word can initiate process of the next word. The other, however, assumes parallel processing where multiple words can be processed simultaneously. This article mainly discusses the differences regarding attention deployment between these two kinds of models and reviews corresponding evidences supporting them. It also reviews attention allocation theories and findings from related fields, hoping to introduce different perspectives to the attention allocation studies in reading. |
|
来源
|
心理科学进展
,2012,20(11):1755-1767 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
阅读
;
眼动
;
注意分配
;
序列加工
;
平行加工
|
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院行为科学重点实验室, 北京, 100101
2.
中国科学院研究生院, 北京, 100049
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
ISSN
|
1671-3710 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金
;
中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:4694076
|
参考文献 共
98
共5页
|
|
1.
白学军. 中文阅读过程中的副中央凹预视效应.
心理科学进展,2011,19(12):1721-1729
|
CSCD被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
白学军. 中文阅读的副中央凹-中央凹效应:词n的语义透明度对词n-1加工的影响.
心理学报,2009,41(5):377-386
|
CSCD被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
崔磊. 中文阅读中副中央凹与中央凹相互影响的眼动实验.
心理学报,2010,42(5):547-558
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
李兴珊. 中文阅读中词切分的认知机理述评.
心理科学进展,2011,19(4):459-470
|
CSCD被引
29
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Adelman J S. Letters in words are read simultaneously, not in left-to-right sequence.
Psychological Science,2010,21(12):1799-1801
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Altarriba J. Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: Evidence from fluent Spanish-English bilinguals.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,2001,63(5):875-890
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Angele B. Parafoveal Processing of Word n+2 During Reading: Do the Preceding Words Matter?.
Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance,2011,37(4):1210-1220
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Angele B. Parafoveal processing in reading: Manipulating n+1 and n+2 previews simultaneously.
Visual Cognition,2008,16(6):697-707
|
CSCD被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Baylis G C. Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,1993,19(3):451-470
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Binder K S. Extraction of information to the left of the fixated word in reading.
Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance,1999,25(4):1162-1172
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Chen H C. The effective visual field in reading Chinese.
Reading and Writing,1998,10:245-254
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Chen Z. Reinstating object-based attention under positional certainty: The importance of subjective parsing.
Perception & Psychophysics,2006,68(6):992-1003
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Downing C J. The spatial structure of visual attention.
Attention and Performance. (Vol, XI),1985:171-187
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Drieghe D. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements in text reading: Does an extra space make a difference?.
Vision Research,2005,45(13):1693-1706
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Drieghe D. Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading.
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,2008,61(8):1239-1249
|
CSCD被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Driver J. Movement and visual attention: The spotlight metaphor breaks down.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,1989,15(3):448-456
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Duncan J. Selective attention and the organization of visual information.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,1984,113(4):501-517
|
CSCD被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Egly R. Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,1994,123(2):161-177
|
CSCD被引
17
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Engbert R. Mathematical models of eye movements in reading: A possible role for autonomous saccades.
Biological Cybernetics,2001,85:77-87
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Engbert R. A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing.
Vision Reserch,2002,42:621-636
|
CSCD被引
24
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问