解释偏向矫正:“自下而上”地改变社交焦虑个体的解释偏向?
Cognitive bias modification of interpretation for social anxiety: A “bottom-up” intervention?
查看参考文献71篇
|
文摘
|
长久以来,研究者发现社交焦虑个体对模糊的社交情境存在偏向性的解释,而这种解释偏向对于社交焦虑障碍的产生、维持与复发具有重要影响。近年来,越来越多的研究者开始关注解释偏向矫正训练,因其能够通过简单的重复性实验“自下而上”地改变焦虑个体的这种解释偏向。与此同时,部分研究人员还发现经过这种“自下而上”的训练之后,焦虑个体的情绪状态也有所改善。然而,解释偏向矫正是一个新领域,存在整体研究异质性高、矫正训练机制不明确等争议。首先,本文总结了该领域的常用研究范式,从被试临床状态与年龄特征两个方面梳理了解释偏向矫正领域的研究现状。其次,本文重点关注了解释偏向矫正训练作用于社交焦虑障碍的起效机制,综合过往研究建立了一个新的“干预作用模型”,探讨了可能影响因素(自我意象、自尊、对威胁性刺激的评估、正性评价恐惧、长时记忆、焦虑敏感性和回避行为)。最后,本文从解释偏向、焦虑症状、迁移效应、实验设计和整体领域研究质量等五个方面分析了目前存在的争议与问题,同时指出了未来的研究方向。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Cognitive models of social anxiety propose that socially anxious individuals tend to interpret ambiguous social events differently than healthy controls, embodying the presence of a negative interpretation bias and a lack of positive interpretation bias. This interpretation bias has been considered to play an important role in the etiology, maintenance, and recurrence of the disease. Many studies suggest that interpretation bias, as well as negative affect, can be directly shifted through repeated experiential practice, known as Cognitive Bias Modification of Interpretation(CBM-I). This has led to a growing interest in exploring the clinical potential of this “bottom-up” intervention. However, there has been some controversy about the heterogeneity of studies and the uncertainty about the cognitive mechanisms of this approach in the recent decade. The present article summarizes the frequently-used paradigms and reviews studies in terms of participants' age and clinical status. Moreover, it focuses on discussing the potential cognitive mechanisms of CBM-I. An intervention model for the underlying mechanisms is proposed based on established cognitive models of social anxiety disorder and relevant factors(self-imagery, self-esteem, evaluation of threatening messages, fear of positive evaluation, long-term memory, anxiety sensitivity, and avoidance). Limitations of the studies reviewed are analyzed from five aspects: interpretation bias, social anxiety, transfer effect, experimental design and study heterogeneity. Directions for future research are addressed as well. |
|
来源
|
心理科学进展
,2018,26(5):859-871 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.00859
|
|
关键词
|
社交焦虑障碍
;
社交恐怖
;
解释偏向
;
解释偏差
;
解释偏向矫正
|
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室, 北京, 100101
2.
中国科学院大学, 北京, 100049
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1671-3710 |
|
学科
|
基础医学 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6252433
|
参考文献 共
71
共4页
|
|
1.
黄嘉笙. 认知偏差矫正:范式与效果.
中国临床心理学杂志,2015,23(3):443-447
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
李涛. 社交焦虑解释偏差：研究范式、特征及矫正.
心理科学进展,2013,21(12):2196-2203
|
CSCD被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
张道龙(译).
精神障碍诊断与统计手册.(第5版),2016
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
杨鹏. 社交焦虑大学生对正性评价解释偏向的初步探究.
中国心理卫生杂志,2015,29(12):933-938
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Amir N. Interpretation bias and social anxiety.
Cognitive Therapy and Research,2005,29(4):433-443
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Amir N. Lack of a benign interpretation bias in social anxiety disorder.
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy,2012,41(2):119-129
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Amir N. Interpretation training in individuals with generalized social anxiety disorder: A randomized controlled trial.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,2012,80(3):497-511
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Beard C. A multi-session interpretation modification program: Changes in interpretation and social anxiety symptoms.
Behaviour Research and Therapy,2008,46(10):1135-1141
|
CSCD被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Beard C. Interpretation in social anxiety: When meaning precedes ambiguity.
Cognitive Therapy and Research,2009,33(4):406-415
|
CSCD被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Beard C. Combined cognitive bias modification treatment for social anxiety disorder: A pilot trial.
Depression and Anxiety,2011,28(11):981-988
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Beard C. Socially anxious primary care patients' attitudes toward cognitive bias modification (CBM): A qualitative study.
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy,2012,40(5):618-633
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Beck A T. An information processing model of anxiety: Automatic and strategic processes.
Behaviour Research and Therapy,1997,35(1):49-58
|
CSCD被引
15
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Bowler J O. Asymmetrical transfer effects of cognitive bias modification: Modifying attention to threat influences interpretation of emotional ambiguity, but not vice versa.
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry,2017,54:239-246
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Bowler J O. A comparison of cognitive bias modification for interpretation and computerized cognitive behavior therapy: Effects on anxiety, depression, attentional control, and interpretive bias.
Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology,2012,80(6):1021-1033
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Brettschneider M. Internet-based interpretation bias modification for social anxiety: A pilot study.
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry,2015,49:21-29
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Brosan L. Cognitive bias modification for attention and interpretation reduces trait and state anxiety in anxious patients referred to an out-patient service: Results from a pilot study.
Journal of Behavior Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry,2011,42(3):258-264
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Capron D W. Combined "top-down" and "bottom-up" intervention for anxiety sensitivity: Pilot randomized trial testing the additive effect of interpretation bias modification.
Journal of Psychiatric Research,2017,85:75-82
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Chan S W Y. Is cognitive bias modification training truly beneficial for adolescents?.
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,2015,56(11):1239-1248
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Clark D A. Cognitive theory and therapy of anxiety and depression: Convergence with neurobiological findings.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2010,14(9):418-424
|
CSCD被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Clark D M. A cognitive model of social phobia.
Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment,1995:69-93
|
CSCD被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问