帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

中国大城市拆迁安置居民补偿方式与受益率测度——以南京为例
The Measure of Displaced Households’Compensation Approaches and Benefits Rate Based on Regression Model: A Case of Nanjing

查看参考文献24篇

孙东琪 1   张京祥 2 *   陈浩 2   胡毅 3  
文摘 拆迁安置补偿是城市内城改造与扩张过程中涉及拆迁居民利益的核心问题,拆迁安置家庭多个特征因影响补偿方式和受益率。针对补偿方式不同与受益率不同,分别采用二项逻辑回归与多元线性回归模型,对南京市4个安置区的349户拆迁安置居民家庭进行了实证分析,结果表明:① 对于实物补偿和货币补偿,城中村拆迁安置居民家庭和夫妻双方职业均为“无业”的家庭更容易获得实物补偿。② 单从经济角度来讲,城中村拆迁安置家庭成为拆迁安置家庭中的最大受益者,7人及以上的大家庭、高学历家庭也是货币补偿中的受益者。但其受益并非是由市场化的结果造成,而是市场作用与计划经济旧有制度的共同使然。因此,建立公平合理的补偿机制是解决问题的关键。
其他语种文摘 Displaced compensation is the main point of displaced households’benefits in inner-city restructuring and urban expansion. Its compensation approaches and benefits rate are influenced by many factors. This article uses 349 displaced residential surveys conducted in 4 resettlement areas in Nanjing to examine the compensation. 1) Examining compensation approaches by using binary logistic regression. In China, there are two approaches: in-kind compensation and monetary compensation. The result shows that displaced households from urban village and households with the couple are both unemployed are more likely to get in-kind compensation. Because of the large size of their displaced housing area in urban village, the monetary expenses are too high to the local government. And the resettlement housing is founded by the central government and municipal government subsidies, not by the local government alone, therefore, the local government are more likely to offer in-kind compensation for displaced households from urban village. 2) Examining the benefits rate of displaced households who get monetary compensation. The results show that: households from urban village have the highest benefits rate, because before displacement they could get more income from renting their housing, the local government have to give more to persuade them to leave. And“more than 7 members’large household size”and“high education level”have significant positive contribution to benefits rate. For the large size households, the local government could consider their actual situation to give more benefits. And for the high education households, they know more law and policies to negotiate with the local government to get more. But the household with stated-work unit family member get less benefit rate. The results of this analysis could have several explanations. One is that residents who held a position in a work unit are usually better off than farmers. They are able to accept a lower discount than farmers, and may even purchase market housing. Another explanation is that since work units are supported by corresponding ministries of the central government, or have to maintain good relationships with the local government, in some demolition projects the local government coordinates with work units to make sure that employees are forced to move or to accept and sign the compensation contracts as soon as possible which make them loss the negotiation chance. We conclude that the benefit is not the result of market-oriented, but the product of the market and the old system of planned economy. Because in the process of compensation, the local government still use some the planned economy period approaches, such as incomplete monetization, set the standard ceiling; consider the households actual situation (whether they are low-income), etc.. Market led by the demolition and land transfer, in the resettlement compensation is still the implementation of non-market approach. Therefore, the establishment of fair and reasonable compensation mechanism is the key solution.
来源 地理科学 ,2016,36(2):161-169 【核心库】
DOI 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2016.02.001
关键词 回归模型 ; 拆迁安置 ; 补偿方式 ; 受益率 ; 南京
地址

1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京, 100101  

2. 南京大学建筑与城市规划学院, 江苏, 南京, 210093  

3. 住房和城乡建设部城乡规划管理中心, 北京, 100835

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 1000-0690
学科 社会科学总论
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目
文献收藏号 CSCD:5670660

参考文献 共 24 共2页

1.  Kempen R V. Undivided cities in the Netherlands: present situation,and policy rhetoric. Housing Studies,1999,14(5):641-657 CSCD被引 1 次    
2.  Atkinson R. The hidden costs of gentrification: Displacement in central London. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment,2000,15(4):307-326 CSCD被引 3 次    
3.  Bolt G. After urban restructuring:relocations and segregation in Dutch cities. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie,2009,100(4):502-518 CSCD被引 3 次    
4.  Bolt G. Dispersal patterns of households who are forced to move:desegregation by demolition:A case study of Dutch citie. Housing Studies,2010,25(2):159-180 CSCD被引 2 次    
5.  Reinout K. On priority and progress:forced residential relocation and housing chances in Haaglanden,the Netherlands. Housing Studies,2010,23(4):565-587 CSCD被引 1 次    
6.  Wu F. Intraurban residential relocation in Shanghai:modes and stratification. Environment and Planning A,2004(36):7-25 CSCD被引 1 次    
7.  Li S. And residential satisfaction:a study of Shanghai. Environment and Planning a,2009,41(5):1090-1108 CSCD被引 1 次    
8.  Nathaniel L. Relocation:the impact on housing welfare. Journal of the American Institute of Planners,1961,27(3):199-203 CSCD被引 1 次    
9.  宋伟轩. 新时期南京居住空间分异研究. 地理学报,2010,65(6):685-694 CSCD被引 39 次    
10.  柳林. 市场转型期中国大城市低收入社区住房分异研究. 地理科学,2014,34(8):897-906 CSCD被引 10 次    
11.  袁雯. 南京居住空间分异的特征与模式研究--基于南京主城拆迁改造的透视. 人文地理,2010,25(2):65-69 CSCD被引 9 次    
12.  宋伟轩. 内城区户籍贫困空间剥夺式重构研究——基于南京10843份拆迁安置数据. 地理研究,2013,32(8):1467-1476 CSCD被引 12 次    
13.  国家统计局. 中国房地产年鉴2012,2012 CSCD被引 1 次    
14.  Bian Y J. Market transition and the persistence of power: The changing stratification system in urban China. American Sociological Review,1996,61(5):739-758 CSCD被引 8 次    
15.  刘玉亭. 中国转型期城市贫困问题研究--社会地理学视角的南京实证分析,2003 CSCD被引 1 次    
16.  Huang Y. A room of one's own:housing consumption and residential crowding in transitional urban China. Environment and Planning A,2003(35):591-614 CSCD被引 1 次    
17.  Logan J R. The winners in China's urban housing reform. Housing Studies,2010,25(1):101-117 CSCD被引 7 次    
18.  Wang Y P. Social and spatial implications of housing reform in China. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,2000,24(2):397 CSCD被引 15 次    
19.  Yao Shujie. Understanding income inequality in China: a Multi-Angle perspective. Economics of Planning,1998,31(2/3):133-150 CSCD被引 1 次    
20.  冯玉军. 权力、权利和利益的博弈-我国当前城市房屋拆迁问题的法律与经济分析. 中国法学,2007(4):39-63 CSCD被引 1 次    
引证文献 3 篇

1 黄维华 农村集体土地拆迁补偿影响因素研究——基于湖南省304份调查数据的实证分析 中南林业科技大学学报,2017,37(2):122-130
CSCD被引 1 次

2 陈伊多 不同生计条件下的休耕农户差别化补偿需求研究———以河北省邢台市为例 中国农业资源与区划,2018,39(10):196-203,223
CSCD被引 2 次

显示所有3篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护：中国科学院文献情报中心
地址：北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码：100190 联系电话：(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号