德国在华知识密集制造业投资进入方式的时空特征及区位影响因素
Spatio-temporal characteristics and locational determinants for entry mode of German knowledge-intensive FDI in China
查看参考文献21篇
文摘
|
外资知识密集型制造业进入中国市场,对中国制造业升级转型起着一定的作用。本文围绕区域制度环境和区域吸收能力,探讨影响知识密集型企业进入方式的区域环境,旨在揭示知识密集型产业的外商进入方式的地理驱动机制,有利于加深理解在经济发展方式转型的时代背景下,区域与城市获得外生技术发展动力的机制。采用从1982-2014年德国在华投资企业数据库,结果发现,德国知识密集型制造企业在中国的投资呈现由沿海地区向内陆地区扩张、沿海中心城市向周边城市扩散的时空趋势,并且在1995年后,其进入方式从合资为主向独资为主转变。逻辑计量模型显示,德国知识密集型制造企业的进入方式受到多项区位因子的影响,其中地方人力资源水平和产业专业化水平是知识密集型制造企业选择以合资方式的进入中国市场的重要区位因素,表明区域知识吸收能力是形成全球-地方战略协同的关键变量;另一方面,实际使用外资存量和地方专利授权量这两个区位影响因素则会显著促成知识密集型制造企业采用独资的进入决策,反映了区域制度环境对吸引以知识产权保护为战略核心的知识密集型制造业的作用。 |
其他语种文摘
|
Foreign direct investment in the knowledge- intensive manufacturing industry constitutes the key to industrial upgrading and economic restructuring in China. Present studies on foreign direct investment are still limited in regard to understanding their specific investment behaviors. Entry mode is the key strategy of foreign firms which determines their success in the host countries. Regions, as the basic spatial units with specific economic, social and cultural character, affect the entry mode of foreign firms to a great extent. This paper aims to reveal the geographical mechanism of the entry mode of FDI in the knowledge- intensive manufacturing sector, which advances the understanding of the exogenous- driven mechanism of urban and regional development within the context of economic restructuring in China nowadays. The theoretical framework of this paper proposes two fundamental locational factors influencing the choice of entry mode into the Chinese market: regional institutional environment and regional absorptive capacity. On the one hand, regional institutional environment is expected to influence the transaction cost of doing business in the host countries, in particular within the context of transition economies. When the regional institutional environment is better off, the knowledge-intensive firms tend to choose the whollyowned entry mode to safeguard the interests of their own technology and reduce the risks of being rapidly imitated by local actors without costs. On the other hand, regional absorptive capacity enhances the willingness of foreign firms to form joint ventures with local firms in order to tap into the local knowledge pool. In regions with low absorptive capacity, foreign investment tends to constrain the scope of knowledge exchange within communities of foreign firms, and show limited willingness to cooperate and interact with local firms. Using the database of German knowledge-intensive FDI in China from 1982 to 2014, the analysis shows that the German FDI has been concentrated in the coastal areas of China. Spatio- temporal statistical analysis demonstrates that the location of German FDI has been spreading from coastal to inland provinces. In coastal provinces, it has been spreading from the central to the peripherial cities. Since 1995, the entry mode of German knowledge- intensive FDI has been shifting from joint ventures to wholly-owned mode. The logit model results further show that the entry mode of German FDI in knowledge-intensive sector is driven by multiple locational factors. On one hand, the decision of FDI firms to take joint ventures as the entry mode in the host country is influenced by the level of urban human capital and the degrees of industrial specialization. This implies that regional knowledge absorptive capacity is essential to the formation of local-global strategic coupling. On the other hand, the FDI stock and the number of authorized patents in the city significantly encourage the entry mode decision of a whollyowned FDI firm, because the knowledge-intensive firms'core competence lies in technology. These firms are most concerned about the issues on intellectual right protection. As a result, the regional institutional environment is an important locational determinant for the knowledgeintensive FDI firms. |
来源
|
地理学报
,2017,72(8):1361-1372 【核心库】
|
DOI
|
10.11821/dlxb201708003
|
关键词
|
知识密集型企业
;
进入方式
;
时空特征
;
区位因素
;
德国对华直接投资
|
地址
|
华南师范大学地理科学学院, 广州, 510631
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
0375-5444 |
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
基金
|
国际区域研究协会早期职业发展研究基金(2014年度)
;
国家自然科学基金重点项目
;
国家自然科学基金项目
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6054981
|
参考文献 共
21
共2页
|
1.
UNCTAD.
World Investment Report 2015:Reforming international investment governance,2015
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
2.
李小建. 香港对大陆投资的区位变化与公司空间行为.
地理学报,1996,51(3):213-223
|
CSCD被引
20
次
|
|
|
|
3.
许志桦. 1980-2003年广东省外商投资的时空变化分析.
地理学报,2008,63(12):1277-1288
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
4.
刘作丽. 在华外商直接投资区位研究述评.
地理科学进展,2009,28(6):952-961
|
CSCD被引
19
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Burgel O. The international market entry choices of start-up companies in high-technology industries.
Journal of International Marketing,2000,8(2):33-62
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Bell J. Small firm internationalization and business strategy:An exploratory study of 'knowledgeintensive' and 'traditional' manufacturing firms in the UK.
International Small business journal,2004,22(1):23-56
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Hill C W L. An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry mode.
Strategic Management Journal,1990,11(2):117-128
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
8.
陈浪南. 我国企业跨国市场进入方式的选择战略.
国际贸易问题,2005(7):85-90
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
9.
Dikova D. Foreign direct investment mode choice:entry and establishment modes in transition economies.
Journal of International Business Studies,2007,38(6):1013-1033
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
10.
Chung W. Knowledge seeking and location choice of foreign direct investment in the United States.
Management Science,2002,48(12):1534-1554
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
11.
Martin X. Tacitness, learning, and international expansion:A study of foreign direct investment in a knowledge-intensive industry.
Organization Science,2003,14(3):297-311
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
12.
Wei Y H D. Beyond new regionalism, beyond global production networks:Remaking the Sunan model, China.
Environment and Planning C:Government and Policy,2010,28(1):72-96
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
13.
Weterings A. Spatial concentration of industries and new firm exits:Does this relationship differ between exits by closure and by M&A?.
Regional Studies,2015,49(1):44-58
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
14.
Trinh T.
Foreign direct investments in China:Good prospects for German companies?China Special,2004
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
15.
李从欣. 区域人力资本与经济增长研究.
当代经济管理,2008,30(4):42-44
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
16.
袁林. 东道国人力资本水平与FDI技术溢出的关系:一个文献综述.
山东理工大学学报(社会科学版),2011,27(3):13-16
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
17.
贺灿飞. 产业地理集聚与外商直接投资产业分布——以北京市制造业为例.
地理学报,2006,61(12):1259-1270
|
CSCD被引
27
次
|
|
|
|
18.
Morschett D. Decades of research on market entry modes:What do we really know about external antecedents of entry mode choice?.
Journal of International Management,2010,16(1):60-77
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
19.
赵大丽. 知识转移方式对区域创新能力的影响研究:基于2001-2008年省际数据的分析.
科技进步与对策,2011,28(16):32-37
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
20.
Javorcik B S. The composition of foreign direct investment and protection of intellectual property rights:Evidence from transition economies.
European economic review,2004,48(1):39-62
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|