帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

汉语词汇产生中词汇选择和音韵编码之间的交互作用
The Interaction of Lexical Selection and Phonological Encoding in Chinese Word Production

查看参考文献20篇

文摘 采取图画-词汇干扰实验范式，探索汉语单音节词汇产生中词汇选择和音韵编码之间的交互作用。实验一探测目标图画语义相关项的语音激活，观察到了非目标项的语音激活。实验二探测目标图画语义相关项的字形激活，未发现非目标项的字形激活。在改进实验条件的基础上，实验三验证实验一和二，并探测目标图画字形相关项的语音激活以及语音相关项的字形激活，结果未探测到语义相关项的字形或语音激活、语音相关项的字形激活，只发现了字形相关项的语音激活。实验一至三的结果表明汉语词汇产生中存在目标字字形相关项的语音激活，但不存在从音韵编码阶段至词汇选择阶段的激活反馈。综合上述结果，从是否存在多重的字形或语音激活，以及是否存在从音韵编码至词汇选择的反馈两个方面进行了讨论。研究结果倾向于支持词汇产生中层叠式理论的观点。
其他语种文摘 Introduction An important issue in the study of language production concerns the time course of lexical access and possible interactions between lexical selection and phonological encoding. A number of different models have been proposed in the literature to account for how a word is processed for speaking. For example, the discrete two-stage model assumes that the stages of lexical selection and phonological encoding operate in a strict successive order, and no interaction between the stage of lexical selection and phonological encoding. Alternatively, on the basis of spreading activation, the interactive activation model postulates a bi-directional flow of information between different processing levels. Semantic, lexical, and phonological levels are interconnected in a network fashion. Lexical candidates activate their phonological forms before any single candidate has been selected. That is, not only the word forms of the target lemma, but also the semantic competitors become partially activated. The cascading model assumes that there exists interaction between lexical selection and phonological encoding, but no feedback from the stage of phonological encoding to lexical selection. The debates among three models are （ 1 ） whether there is the interaction between lemma selection and phonological encoding; （2） whether all activated semantic items or only a single selected semantic item gives rise to the phonological activation ; （3） whether there is feedback from phonological encoding to lexical selection. Due to confounding of orthography and phonology in alphabetic languages （i. e. , English and Dutch）, the results of the previous studies （Lupker, 1982; Starreveld ＆ La Heij, 1995） need to be interpreted cautiously. Using the independence of orthography and phonology in Chinese, the present experiments investigated （ 1 ） the multiple phonological activations and the multiple orthographic activations of semantically related words of picture name; （2） whether there is the feedback from phonological encoding to lexical selection with a picture-word interference paradigm. Method In three experiments, the picture-word interference paradigm was used. The participants were required to name a target picture and ignore a distractor word. We varied both the stimulus-onset asynchrony （SOA） and the picture-word rela- tionship along different lexical dimensions. Fifty-five undergraduate students participate in three experiments （20 in experiment 1 and 2 respectively, 15 in experiment 3 ）. ANOVA analyses were performed in the participant and the item analysis in three experiments. Results The data analyses showed that multiple phonological activation of semantically related to target was found in experiment 1, whereas no orthographic activation of semantically related to target was observed in experiment 2. After improving the conditions of experiment 1 and 2, experiment 3＇s results suggested that ： 1 ） no phonological or orthographic activation of semantically related to target was obtained, 2） no orthographic activation of phonologically related to target was found, and 3 ） phonological activation of orthographically related to target was obtained. Conclusion The results suggested that there exist the interaction of lexical selection and phonological encoding, but no activation feedback from phonological stratum to semantic stratum in picture naming. Therefore, the present study supported the cas- cading model, rather than the discrete two-stage model or the interactive activation model in language production.
来源 心理学报 ,2006,38(4):480-488 【核心库】
关键词 词汇产生 ; 图画-词汇干扰实验范式 ; 词汇选择 ; 音韵编码 ; 交互作用
地址

中国科学院心理研究所, 脑与认知科学国家重点实验室, 北京, 100101

语种 中文
ISSN 0439-755X
学科 社会科学总论
基金 国家社会科学基金 ;  国家自然科学基金
文献收藏号 CSCD:2662952

参考文献 共 20 共1页

1.  Roelofs A A. Spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cogniton,1992,42:107-142 CSCD被引 2 次    
2.  Levelt W J M. An MEG study of picture naming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,1998,10(5):553-567 CSCD被引 13 次    
3.  Dell G S. A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review,1986,93:283-321 CSCD被引 26 次    
4.  Peterson R R. Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production:evidence for cascaded processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,1998,24:539-557 CSCD被引 4 次    
5.  Levelt W J M. Speaking:From intention to articulation. Speaking:From intention to articulation,1989 CSCD被引 2 次    
6.  Levelt W J M. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,1999,22:1-75 CSCD被引 56 次    
7.  Levelt W J M. The time course of lexical access in speech production:A study of picture naming. Psychological Review,1991,98:122-142 CSCD被引 7 次    
8.  Jescheniak J D. Discrete serial versus cascaded processing in lexical access in speech production:Further evidence from the coactivation of near-synonyms. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,1998,24(5):1256-1274 CSCD被引 4 次    
9.  Costa A. The production of noun phrases in English and Spanish:Implications for the Scope of phonological encoding in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language,2002,46:178-198 CSCD被引 2 次    
10.  Morsella E. Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,2002,28(3):555-563 CSCD被引 3 次    
11.  Starreveld P A. Semantic interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,1995,21:686-698 CSCD被引 8 次    
12.  Roelofs A. Interaction between semantic and orthographic factors in conceptually driven naming:Comment on Starreveld and La Heij. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,1996,22:246-251 CSCD被引 1 次    
13.  Starreveld P A. The locus of orthographic-phonological facilitation:A reply to Roelofs. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Language,Memory and Cognition,1996,22:252-255 CSCD被引 2 次    
14.  张清芳. 汉语词汇产生中语义、字形和音韵激活的时间进程. 心理学报,2004,36(1):1-8 CSCD被引 16 次    
15.  Chen H-C. The time course of picture-word interference in Chinese. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society,2003,8:98 CSCD被引 2 次    
16.  周晓林. 汉语词汇产生中音、形、义三种信息激活的时间进程. 心理学报,2003,35(6):712-718 CSCD被引 15 次    
17.  Weekes B. Picture-word interference effects on naming in Chinese,2002:101-127 CSCD被引 1 次    
18.  庄捷. 汉语词汇产生中语义、语音层次之间的交互作用. 心理学报,2003,35(3):300-308 CSCD被引 9 次    
19.  张清芳. 影响图画命名时间的因素. 心理学报,2003,35(4):447-454 CSCD被引 42 次    
20.  . 现代汉语频率词典,1986 CSCD被引 19 次    
引证文献 9 篇

1 陈煦海 汉语双字合成词口语产生的词素信息编码 心理学报,2010,42(3):377-386
CSCD被引 0 次

2 陈穗清 图-词干扰范式下汉语口吃者的语义编码 心理学报,2011,43(9):1013-1025
CSCD被引 0 次

显示所有9篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护：中国科学院文献情报中心
地址：北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码：100190 联系电话：(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号