中国环境污染源的区域差异及其社会经济影响因素——基于339个地级行政单元截面数据的实证分析
Regional disparity of environmental pollution source and its socio-economic influencing factors: Based on the cross-section data of 339 cities at prefecture level or above in China
查看参考文献34篇
文摘
|
基于2012年环境污染物排放和社会经济截面数据,选取化学需氧量、二氧化硫及污染源结构指标,定量研究中国339个地级行政单元环境污染源的空间分异和集聚效应,解析环境污染源及排放空间格局的影响因素,并提出污染防控措施与综合治理建议。结果表明:①环境污染源结构区域差异显著,水环境污染源以农业源主导型、城镇生活源主导型、城镇生活和农业源复合型为主,三者比重分别为35.40%、33.92%和25.66%,农业源主导型排放强度最高,主要分布于华北和东北地区;大气环境污染源以工业源绝对主导型为主,其比重为74.63%,分布于除青藏高原区的广大区域。②农业源主导使水污染物集聚式排放加剧,工业源主导则促进了大气污染物集聚式排放,特别在环渤海及其经济腹地区域,污染源结构强化了污染物排放的空间集聚效应。③人口规模、城镇化水平和经济增长速度是污染物排放的主要驱动因素,其中以人口规模影响最为显著;经济发展水平在区域模型中呈现不同的影响效应,对工业源主导型区域的大气污染物排放呈正向影响,而对城镇生活源主导型区域的水体污染物排放具有抑制作用;工业化程度对工业源绝对主导型区域的大气污染物排放正向影响显著。 |
其他语种文摘
|
Based on the cross- section data of pollutant discharge and socio- economic development in 2012, by using the indicators of total discharge of COD and SO_2 and various sources, the spatial differentiation and agglomeration effects of pollutant discharge are measured quantitatively in 339 cities at prefecture level or above in China. Meanwhile, the socio- economic drivers of environmental pollution are estimated through the econometric model, and some suggestions are put forward to reduce and control pollutant discharge. The results show that: (1) The regional differences of the structure of pollutant source are of great significance in China. Specifically, the types of water pollutant sources are mainly included in the region dominated by agricultural source, the region dominated by urban domestic source, and in the region jointly dominated by agricultural and urban domestic source, with the proportions of these regions being 35.40%, 33.92% and 25.66%, respectively. Among them, the discharge intensity of water pollutant is the highest in the region dominated by agricultural source, which are mainly located in North and Northeast China. Meanwhile, the types of air pollutant sources in China are mostly involved in the region absolutely dominated by industrial source, which accounts for 74.63% and is distributed in the vast area of China in addition to the Qinghai- Tibet Plateau. (2) Single and bivariate LISA cluster maps of total discharge and various sources indicate that the agricultural source makes contribution to the spatial agglomeration of high intensity discharge of water pollutants, while the industrial source leads to the concentrated discharge of air pollutants. Especially, in the Bohai Rim region and its economic hinterland, the structure of pollutant sources strengthens the agglomeration effects of pollutant discharge intensity. (3) By means of OLS estimation for nationwide regression model, it is demonstrated that population size, urbanization rate and economic growth are the main driving factors of environmental pollution, and population size is the key factor in China. Moreover, in terms of regression models of regional types, the economic development level makes different contributions to pollutant discharge in various regions, which shows a positive effect on the air pollutant discharge in the region dominated by industrial source, while shows a negative effect on the water pollutant discharge in the region dominated by urban domestic source. In addition, the degree of industrialization has positive influence on the air pollutant discharge in the region absolutely dominated by industrial source. |
来源
|
地理学报
,2016,71(11):1911-1925 【核心库】
|
DOI
|
10.11821/dlxb201611004
|
关键词
|
环境污染
;
污染源
;
区域差异
;
集聚效应
;
影响因素
;
中国
|
地址
|
中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 中国科学院区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室, 北京, 100101
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
0375-5444 |
学科
|
环境保护管理 |
基金
|
国家自然科学基金项目
;
中国科学院科技服务网络计划(STS计划)项目
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5858861
|
参考文献 共
34
共2页
|
1.
陆大道. 中速增长:中国经济的可持续发展.
地理科学,2015,35(10):1207-1219
|
CSCD被引
52
次
|
|
|
|
2.
王强. 我国主要污染物排放强度区域特征分析研究.
环境保护科学,2015,41(3):57-61
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
3.
陈祖海. 中国环境污染变动的时空特征及其经济驱动因素.
地理研究,2015,34(11):2165-2178
|
CSCD被引
27
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Grossman G. Economic, growth and the environment.
Quarterly Journal of Economics,1995,110(2):353-377
|
CSCD被引
485
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Selden T M. Environmental quality and development: Is there a Kuznets Curve for air pollution emissions.
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1994,27(2):147-162
|
CSCD被引
59
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Roca J. Economic growth and atmospheric pollution in Spain: Discussing the environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis.
Ecological Economics,2001,39(1):85-99
|
CSCD被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
7.
马树才. 中国经济增长与环境污染关系的Kuznets曲线.
统计研究,2006,23(8):37-40
|
CSCD被引
23
次
|
|
|
|
8.
牛海鹏. 经济结构、经济发展与污染物排放之间关系的实证研究.
中国软科学,2012(4):160-166
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
9.
赵宇明.
我国省域环境发展类型及污染空间迁移研究,2014
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
10.
王立猛. 基于STIRPAT模型分析中国环境压力的时间差异——以1952-2003年能源消费为例.
自然资源学报,2006,21(6):862-869
|
CSCD被引
22
次
|
|
|
|
11.
赵红. 对外贸易、相对收入与污染物排放:基于我国省级单位面板数据的研究.
南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2013,13(1):103-105
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
12.
Lin S F. Analysis of the environmental impact of China based on STIRPAT model.
Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2009,29(6):341-347
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
13.
唐德才. 工业化进程、产业结构与环境污染:基于制造业行业和区域的面板数据模型.
软科学,2009,118(10):6-11
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
14.
陈媛媛. 开放条件下工业污染物排放强度影响因素分析.
上海财经大学学报,2010,12(4):90-97
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
15.
胡小娟. 中国工业行业外商投资结构的环境效应分析:基于工业行业面板数据的实证检验.
世界经济研究,2010(7):55-61
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
16.
Fujii H. Decomposition analysis of air pollution abatement in China: Empirical study for ten industrial sectors from 1998 to 2009.
Journal of Cleaner Production,2013,59(15):22-31
|
CSCD被引
17
次
|
|
|
|
17.
Hossein H M. Can environment quality spread through institutions?.
Energy Policy,2013,56(2):312-321
|
CSCD被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
18.
Frank A. Urban air quality in larger conurbations in the European Union.
Environmental Modelling & Software,2001,16(4):399-414
|
CSCD被引
18
次
|
|
|
|
19.
徐林清. 污染物排放的空间集聚及其影响因素:基于岭回归模型的分析.
生态经济,2015,31(5):160-165
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
20.
彭文斌. 湖南环境污染与经济增长的实证研究:基于VAR模型的脉冲响应分析.
湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2011,35(1):31-35
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|