认知融合问卷中文版的信效度分析
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire
查看参考文献28篇
|
文摘
|
目的:分析认知融合问卷(CFQ)中文版在一般人群中施测的信效度,为研究认知融合提供可靠有效的测量工具.方法:将CFQ译为中文版,包含13个条目.选取两个样本共1022位受试进行施测,样本l(n1=789)用于条目-总分相关系数分析和探索性因素分析,样本2(n_2 =233)用于验证性因素分析、效标效度和信度检验.用自评抑郁量表(SDS)、自评焦虑量表(SAS)来检验效标效度.间隔2周后,从样本2中随机选取82人进行重测.结果:条目-总分相关系数显示认知解离分问卷(CFQ-D)的4条目均<0.3,予以删除,仅保留认知融合分问卷(CFQ-F)的9条目.修订后探索性因素分析提取出1个因子,方差解释率为60.3%.验证性因素分析显示单因素模型拟合良好(x~2/df=2.01,NFI =0.97,IFI=0.99,CFI =0.99,RMSEA =0.06).效标效度检验显示,CFQ-F与SDS和SAS得分均呈正相关(r=0.50、0.55,均P<0.01).CFQ-F内部一致性系数为0.92,重测信度0.67.结论:认知融合问卷(CFQ)应只保留认知融合分问卷(CFQ-F).CFQ-F中文版具有较好的信效度,可在我国用于认知融合相关研究. |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Objective:To examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ).Methods:The English version of the CFQ was translated into Chinese,including 13 items.By convenience sampling method,two samples were selected.Sample 1 (n=789) was assessed with the CFQ for item analysis and exploratory factor analysis (EFA).Sample 2 (n=233) was assessed with the CFQ for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA),criterion-related validity and reliability analysis.The Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) and Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) were administered to test the criterion-related validity.Eighty-two subjects were chosen to assess test-retest reliability two weeks later.Results:Item analysis showed that CFQ-D should be removed for not reaching the psychometric standard.The exploratory factor analysis extracted 1 component,and explained 60.3% of the total variance.The confirmatory factor analysis verified the 1-factor model (χ~2/ df=2.01,NFI=0.97,IFI=0.99,CFI=0.99,RMSEA=0.06).Concurrent validity results showed that CFQ-F were positively correlated with total scores of SDS (r=0.50,P<0.01) and SAS (r=0.55,P<0.01).The Cronbach' s α coefficient of the CFQ-F was 0.92,and test-retest reliability of CFQ-F was 0.67.Conclusion:It suggests that CFQ-D should be removed from CFQ.On the contrary,the Chinese version of CFQ-F is a reliable and valid assessment of cognitive fusion,and could be used in China in study of cognitive fusion. |
|
来源
|
中国心理卫生杂志
,2014,28(1):40-44 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
认知融合
;
认知解离
;
接纳与承诺疗法
;
信度
;
效度
;
心理测量学研究
|
|
地址
|
中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室, 北京, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1000-6729 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目
;
中国科学院战略性先导科技专项
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:5087502
|
参考文献 共
28
共2页
|
|
1.
Kupfer D J.
A research agenda for DSM-V,2008
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
APA.
Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders:DSM-IV-TR,2000
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
WHO.
The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders:clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines,1992
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Brown L A. Investigating the similarities and differences between practitioners of second-and third-wave cognitive-behavioral therapies.
Behav Modif,2011,35(2):187-200
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Hayes S C. Open,aware,and active:contextual approaches as an emerging trend in the behavioral and cognitive therapies.
Annu Rev Clin Psychol,2011,7:141-168
|
CSCD被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Kraemer H C. Validity and psychiatric diagnoses.
JAMA Psychiatry,2013,70(2):138-139
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Hayes S C. Acceptance and commitment therapy,relational frame theory,and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies.
Behav Ther,2004,35(4):639-665
|
CSCD被引
25
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Hinton M J. Cognitive defusion for psychological distress,dysphoria,and low self-esteem:a randomized technique evaluation trial of vocalizing strategies.
Int J Behav Consul Ther,2010,6(3):163-185
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Wicksell R K. Avoidance and cognitive fusion-central components in pain related disability? Development and preliminary validation of the Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS).
Euro J Pain,2008,12(4):491-500
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Hayes S C. Experiential avoidance,cognitive fusion,and an ACT approach to anorexia nervosa.
Cogn Behav Pract,2002,9(3):243-247
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Hayes S C.
Acceptance and commitment therapy:an experiential approach to behavior change,2012:243-269
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Hayes S C.
Rule-governed behavior:cognition,contingencies,and instructional control,1989
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Hayes S C. Acceptance and commitment therapy:model,processes and outcomes.
Behav Res Ther,2006,44(1):1-25
|
CSCD被引
72
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
张婍. 接纳与承诺疗法的心理病理模型和治疗模式.
中国心理卫生杂志,2012,26(5):377-381
|
CSCD被引
37
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Schmalz J E. Measuring experiential avoidance in adults:the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire.
Int J Behav Consul Ther,2010,6(3):198-213
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Greco L A. Psychological inflexibility in childhood and adolescence:development and evaluation of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for youth.
Psychol Assess,2008,20(2):93-102
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Forman E M. The Drexel defusion scale:A new measure of experiential distancing.
J Contextual Behav Sci,2012(1):55-65
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Gillanders D. The Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire:further developments in measuring cognitive fusion.
Association for Contextual Behavioral Science,World Congress VIII,2010
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Dempster M A.
The Development and initial validation of a scale to measure cognitive fusion:submitted in part fulfilment of the degree of Doctorate in Clinical Psychology,2009
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Lindsey C.
Test-retest reliability and further validation of the cognitive fusion questionnaire,2010
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问