用"你"表述物体的功能会抑制成因对分类的影响
"You" is Different: Inhibition from A Second Person Functional Depiction to Object's History's Influence on Object Naming
查看参考文献31篇
|
文摘
|
已有研究显示物体的成因等变量会影响人造物概念的分类;但这种影响的中介变量为何,基于设计和基于用途的理论有不同的假设.实验采用物体自由命名任务,在陈述物体的功能时,操纵角色词的类型(旁观者"有人"和使用者"你"),比较被试对物体的命名在领域水平的分类倾向.结果发现,呈现"旁观者"角色词时,呈现或不呈现物体自然形成的成因故事会造成不同的分类倾向;但是在呈现"使用者"角色词时,成因故事对分类倾向的影响消失了.提示物体的功能是成因和分类的中介变量,支持基于用途的人造物分类模型. |
|
其他语种文摘
|
How do people categorize an object into artifact domain? Many researchers consider creator's intended design (Bloom, 1996) to be a mediate variable between the final judgment and many single factors, such as objects history (Gelman and Bloom 2000), plausibility of object's function (Asher and Kemler Nelson, 2008), and creator's label to the object (Jaswal 2006). As an alternative theory, the utility-based view (Sun and Fu 2005) postulates that usinggoal is the mediate variable instead of creator's design. This view predicts that if subjects consider them as users rather than viewers of an object, the object would be named as an artifact because its functional information would be strongly activated.We used a short-depiction-based object free naming task to test the above hypothesis ( see Sun, Wang, and Fu, 2006). More than 160 subjects were randomly assigned to one of four experiment groups. A2 (pronoun in functional depiction; "You" vs. "someone" used the object) ×2 (object's history: naturally-formed vs. not mentioned) between-subject design was used. In a 7-page booklet we described 6 objects (one object per page) plus a cover page. Subjects were asked to read the depictions and write down their naming, confidence rating, and naming reasons for each object.The results showed an interesting interaction between pronoun and object's history. At the " someone" condition, subjects significantly less named objects into artifact domain when the object history was " naturally-formed" than " not mentioned". But at "you" condition such difference disappeared. Besides, subjects in both conditions named object into artifact domain no matter whether the object was formed naturally or not and their confidence ratings were at the same level. Finally, functional properties of objects were more listed as naming reasons in " You" condition than in" Someone" condition.Current findings suggest that object's function mediates object's history and category judgment. Based on this, we further discussed artifact concept categorization from the utility-based perspective. |
|
来源
|
心理学报
,2009,41(4):283-291 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
人造物
;
分类
;
设计
;
意图
;
功能
|
|
地址
|
1.
浙江理工大学,心理学系, 浙江, 杭州, 310018
2.
中国科学院心理研究所, 脑与认知科学国家重点实验室, 北京, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
ISSN
|
0439-755X |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
国家973计划
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:3510895
|
参考文献 共
31
共2页
|
|
1.
Asher,Y.M. Was it designed to do that? Children's focus on intended function in their conceptualization of artifacts.
COGNITION,2008,106(1):474-483
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Barsalou,L.W. Ad hoc categories.
Memory &Cognition,1983,11(3):211-227
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Barsalou,L.W. The HIPE theory of function.
Representing functional features for language and space:Insights from perception,categorization and development,2005
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Barton,M.E. Defining features of natural kinds and artifacts.
Journal ofPsycholinguistic Research,1989,18(5):433-447
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Bloom,P. Intention,history,and artifact concepts.
COGNITION,1996,60(1):1-29
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Casler,K. Reasoning about artifacts at 24months:The developing teleo-functional stance.
COGNITION,2007,103(1):120-130
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Chaigneau,S.E.
The role of function in categorization.Theorla et historla Scientiarum(in press)
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Chaignean,S.E. Assessing the Causal Structure of Function.
Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,2004,133(4):601-625
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Chrysikou,E.G. When shoes become hammers:Goal-derived categorization training enhances problem.solving performance.
Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition,2006,32(4):935-942
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Csibra,G. Teleological and referential understanding of action in infancy.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London,2003,358(1431):447-458
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Defeyter,M.A. Acquiring an understanding of design:evidence from children's insight problem solving.
COGNITION,2003,89(2):133-155
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Diesendruck,G. Children's reliance on creator's intent in extending name,s for artifacts.
Psychological Science,2003,14(2):164-168
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Gelman,S.A. Young children are sensitive to how an object was created when deciding what to name it.
COGNITION,2000,76(2):91-103
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
German,T.P. Functional fixedness in a technologically sparse culture.
Psychological Science,2005,16(1):1-5
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Gutheil,G. The role of historical intuitions in children's and adults'naming of artifacts.
COGNITION,2004,91(1):23-42
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Jaswal,V.K. Preschoolers favor the creator's label when reasoning about an attifact's function.
COGNITION,2006,99(3):B83-B92
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Keil,F.C.
Concepts,kinds,and cognitive development,1989
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Kelemen,D. British and American children's preferences for teleo.functional explanations of the natural world.
COGNITION,2003,88(2):201-221
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Kelemen,D. Are Children"Intuitive Theists"? Reasoning about purpose and design in nature.
Psychological Science,2004,15(5):295-301
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Kemler Nelson,D.G. Young children's use of functional information to categorize artifacts:Three factors that matter.
COGNITION,2000,77(2):133-168
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问