个体参赌意愿跨情境特殊性分析
To gamble or not to gamble: a domain-specific intention
查看参考文献18篇
文摘
|
目的 评价个体在各类赌博情境中的行为倾向,探讨赌博类别这一情境性变量对参赌意愿的影响.方法 对373名澳门被试在13种博彩游戏中的参赌意愿进行问卷调查,并对所获取的参赌意愿数据进行探索性因素分析.结果 抽取出2个特征根大于1的因素,分别命名为低对弈性赌博和高对弈性赌博,两因素分别解释了 32.59%和26.86%的变异量,累积解释率为59.46%.被试在低对弈性赌博中的参赌意愿普遍偏低[(1.62±1.13)分~(2.20±1.35)分],而在高对弈性赌博中的参赌意愿则普遍偏高[(2.34±1.39)分~(3.02±1.55)分].结论 跨情境的特殊性不仅存在于一般的风险决策中,个体的参赌意愿也具有跨情境特殊性的特点,即各种博彩并非生来平等,参赌意愿较高的个体并非对所有博彩(赌博类别)的参赌意愿都高 |
其他语种文摘
|
Objective To explore whether an individual' s intention to gamble varied across different types of gambling. Methods A total of 373 Macau students completed a questionnaire survey on intention to gamble dealing with thirteen types of gambling, and exploratory factor analyses were conducted. Results The analyses showed two factors that had eigenvalues greater than one and explained a total of 59. 455 percent of the variance, with the largest factor explaining 32.59 percent. Participants' intentions to gamble were relatively lower in gambles of low counterparty with mean scores varying from (1.62 ± 1.13) to (2.20 ± 1.35), while the intentions were higher in gambles of high counterparty with mean scores varying from (2.34 ± 1. 39) to (3.02 ± 1.55). Conclusion Respondents' degree of intention to gamble was highly domain-specific, varying with the type of gambling. An individual' s intention to gamble is not consistent across all content domains, which implied that a potential gambler is not necessarily intended to gamble in all types of gambling |
来源
|
中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
,2010,19(11):1012-1015 【扩展库】
|
关键词
|
参赌意愿
;
跨情境特殊性
;
探索性因素分析
|
地址
|
1.
澳门科技大学行政与管理学院, 澳门, 999078
2.
中国科学院心理研究所社会与经济行为研究中心
3.
澳门理工学院博彩教学暨研究中心
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1674-6554 |
学科
|
外科学 |
基金
|
国家自然科学基金项目
;
北京市重点学科建设项目
;
中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:4095511
|
参考文献 共
18
共1页
|
1.
葉智魁. 他山之石的启示-赌博合法化的美国经验及研究.
台湾人文生态研究,2003,1:99-124
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
2.
Goodman R.
The luck business:the devastating consequences and broken promises of America's gambling explosion,1995:12-57
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
3.
曹玉萍. 家庭暴力的家庭危险因素分析.
中国行为医学科学,2008,17:34-36
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
4.
沙维伟. 扬州市已婚女性家庭暴力情况调查.
中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2009,18:60-62
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Shaffer HJ. Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada:a research synthesis.
Am J Public Health,1999,89:1369-1376
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Dyer JS. Relative risk aversion.
Manage Sci,1982,28:875-886
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
7.
MacCrimmon KR. Characteristics of risk taking executives.
Manage Sci,1990,36:422-435
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
8.
Weber EU. A domain-specific risk-attitude scale:measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors.
J Behav Decis Making,2002,15:263-290
|
CSCD被引
32
次
|
|
|
|
9.
Soane E. Are risk preferences consistent? the influence of decision domain and personality.
Pers Indiv Differ,2005,38:1781-1791
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
10.
Blais AR. A domain-specific risk-taking (DOSPERT)scale for adult populations.
Judgm Decis Mak,2006,1:33-47
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
11.
Weller JA. Predicting domain-specific risk taking with the HEXACO personality structure.
J Behav Decis Making,2010
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
12.
孙悦. 澳门人的风险知觉与赌博行为.
心理学报,2005,37:1-12
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
13.
Goodman JK. Special random numbers:beyond the illusion of control.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision,2006,99:161-174
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
14.
Nordgren LF. Unpacking perceived control in risk perception:the mediating role of anticipated regret.
J Behav Decis Making,2007,20:533-544
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
15.
郭志刚.
社会统计分析方法-SPSS软件应用,2006:63-86
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
16.
Li S. Anticipated regret, risk perception,or both:which is most likely responsible for our intention to gamble?.
J Gambl Stud,2010,26:105-116
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
17.
Abbott MW. The New Zealand national survey of problem and pathological gambling.
J Gambl Stud,1996,12:143-160
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
18.
Oeusoonthornwattana O. I like what I know:is recognition a non-compensatory determiner of consumer choice?.
Judgm Decis Mak,2010,5:310-325
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|