典型村域乡村重构的过程及其驱动因素
Process and driving factors of rural restructuring in typical villages
查看参考文献54篇
文摘
|
乡村重构是实施推进乡村振兴战略的重要手段,一个完整的乡村重构过程通常由初始期、发展期、趋稳期、稳成期等不同阶段组成。本文在构建乡村重构过程分析的理论框架基础上,探索引入乡村发展指数、乡村重构强度指数和乡村重构贡献率的概念,选取大都市郊区和平原农区典型村域开展乡村重构过程的定量研究和驱动因素的对比分析。研究表明:① 20世纪90年代以来,伴随产业结构由传统农业向工业采矿业、旅游服务业转型,黄山店村社会经济形态和地域空间结构发生了剧烈重构,乡村重构过程依次经历了初始阶段、发展阶段,目前处于趋稳阶段;杨桥村产业发展经历了传统农业主导、农业兼业化生产阶段,自2000年以来开始出现社会经济重构迹象,近年来在地方政府推动下生活空间发生重构,但经济形态尚未发生明显改观,目前村域整体上仍处于低水平发展阶段。②黄山店村快速的乡村重构是市场需求牵引、政府宏观政策引导等外源性因素及资源环境、区位条件、行为主体、经济基础、文化特质等内源性因素综合作用的结果;杨桥村的重构历程主要受城镇化、工业化、技术进步等社会经济发展进程以及“新农村建设”“增减挂钩”等外源性政策因素主导,缺乏内生发展动力是导致其重构速度相对缓慢的根源。 |
其他语种文摘
|
Rural restructuring is an important means of implementing and pushing forward the strategy of rural vitalization. A complete process of rural restructuring usually consists of different stages, including initial period, development period, stabilizing period and stable period. Based on the established theoretical framework of analyzing the process of rural restructuring, by introducing the concepts of rural development index, the intensity of rural restructuring and the contribution rate of rural restructuring, the quantitative research and comparative analysis of the driving factors of rural restructuring process at village scale were carried out in the typical villages in metropolitan suburbs and plain farming areas. The results show that: (1) Since the 1990s, along with the transformation of industrial structure from traditional agriculture to industrial mining and tourism service industry, the socio- economic forms and territorial spatial structure of Huangshandian Village have undergone drastic restructuring, and the process of rural restructuring has experienced the initial stage and the development stage successively, and in a stabilizing stage now. The industrial development of Yangqiao Village has experienced the stages of traditional agricultural leading and concurrent farming production. Since 2000, it has taken on a sign of socio- economic restructuring. Recently, the living space has been reconstructed under the promotion of local governments, but the economic form has not changed significantly. At present, the village is still at a low level of development as a whole. (2) The rapid rural restructuring in Huangshandian Village is the results of combined action of exogenous and endogenous factors. The exogenous factors include market requirement pull, government macro- policy guidance, and so on. The endogenous factors include resources and environment, location conditions, behavioral agent, economic foundation, cultural trait, and so on. The restructuring process of Yangqiao Village is mainly dominated by socio- economic development course including urbanization, industrialization and technological progress as well as some exogenous policies such as "building new countryside" and "increasing vs. decreasing balance" land-use policy. The root cause for its relatively slow restructuring speed is lacking of endogenous development impetus. |
来源
|
地理学报
,2019,74(2):323-339 【核心库】
|
DOI
|
10.11821/dlxb201902009
|
关键词
|
乡村重构
;
乡村振兴
;
乡村地域系统
;
大都市郊区
;
平原农区
;
乡村地理学
|
地址
|
1.
南宁师范大学, 北部湾环境演变与资源利用教育部重点实验室, 南宁, 530001
2.
中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京, 100101
3.
中国科学院大学资源与环境学院, 北京, 100049
4.
南宁师范大学地理科学与规划学院, 南宁, 530001
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
0375-5444 |
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
基金
|
国家自然科学基金重点项目
;
中国博士后科学基金
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6431247
|
参考文献 共
54
共3页
|
1.
Liu Y. Revitalize the world's countryside.
Nature,2017,548(7667):275-277
|
CSCD被引
78
次
|
|
|
|
2.
刘彦随. 中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴.
地理学报,2018,73(4):637-650
|
CSCD被引
619
次
|
|
|
|
3.
龙花楼. 论乡村重构.
地理学报,2017,72(4):563-576
|
CSCD被引
282
次
|
|
|
|
4.
龙花楼. 乡村重构的理论认知.
地理科学进展,2018,37(5):581-590
|
CSCD被引
114
次
|
|
|
|
5.
龙花楼. 土地利用转型与乡村振兴.
中国土地科学,2018,32(7):1-6
|
CSCD被引
104
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Tu S. Rural restructuring at village level under rapid urbanization in metropolitan suburbs of China and its implications for innovations in land use policy.
Habitat International,2018,77:143-152
|
CSCD被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Hoggart K. What rural restructuring?.
Journal of Rural Studies,2001,17(1):41-62
|
CSCD被引
56
次
|
|
|
|
8.
Woods M.
Rural Geography: Processes, Responses and Experiences in Rural Restructuring,2005
|
CSCD被引
30
次
|
|
|
|
9.
张泉.
城乡统筹下的乡村重构,2006
|
CSCD被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
10.
杨忍. 中国乡村转型重构研究进展与展望——逻辑主线与内容框架.
地理科学进展,2015,34(8):1019-1030
|
CSCD被引
109
次
|
|
|
|
11.
刘彦随. 中国地域多功能性评价及其决策机制.
地理学报,2011,66(10):1379-1389
|
CSCD被引
151
次
|
|
|
|
12.
林若琪. 转型期乡村多功能性及景观重塑.
人文地理,2012,27(2):45-49
|
CSCD被引
30
次
|
|
|
|
13.
房艳刚. 基于多功能理论的中国乡村发展多元化探讨——超越“现代化”发展范式.
地理学报,2015,70(2):257-270
|
CSCD被引
131
次
|
|
|
|
14.
Marsden T.
Rural Restructuring: Global Processes and Their Responses,1990
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
15.
李伯华. 中国传统村落人居环境转型发展及其研究进展.
地理研究,2017,36(10):1886-1900
|
CSCD被引
33
次
|
|
|
|
16.
Nelson P B. Rural restructuring in the American West: Land use, family and class discourses.
Journal of Rural Studies,2001,17(4):395-407
|
CSCD被引
41
次
|
|
|
|
17.
Lobley M. Agricultural change and restructuring: Recent evidence from a survey of agricultural households in England.
Journal of Rural Studies,2004,20(4):499-510
|
CSCD被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
18.
刘彦随. 中国东部沿海地区乡村转型发展与新农村建设.
地理学报,2007,62(6):563-570
|
CSCD被引
191
次
|
|
|
|
19.
Van A P M. Amenities, affluence, and ideology: Comparing rural restructuring processes in the US and Norway.
Landscape Research,2011,36(1):63-84
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
20.
Long H. Analysis of rural transformation development in China since the turn of the new millennium.
Applied Geography,2011,31(3):1094-1105
|
CSCD被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|