帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

明知故犯?故意不道德行为的影响因素和心理过程
Violate Knowingly? Factors and Psychological Mechanism of Intentional Unethical Behavior

查看参考文献67篇

王亚婷 1,2   王詠 1 *  
文摘 故意不道德行为是指个体在明知行为违背了道德规范、但仍采取的不道德行为。研究表明,故意不道德行为存在众多诱发因素,其中道德自我概念具有重要的自我调节作用,在行为发生前后都产生重要影响。本文对故意不道德行为的影响因素进行了梳理,探索其行为前后的心理过程,并对既有的研究框架进行了整合,构建了从诱发因素、动机、心理冲突、调节、决策行为及行为后体验和调节机制的一系列过程。并在回顾的基础上,提出了四点未来可能的研究方向,包括强化不道德行为的作用机制探索、从心理动机视角理解和抑制不道德行为、对诱发不道德行为的无意识偏向的关注和拓展目前的研究方法和研究情境。
其他语种文摘 Intentional unethical behavior, characterized by breaking the daily standards and violating the moral compass consciously, is currently widespread in the public fields and private spaces and gives rise to immense economic and social cost. In this paper, we constructed a process model of conducting intentional unethical behavior, which depicted the inducing factors and underlying pre-violation and post-violation psychological mechanisms from the perspective of self-concept maintenance theory and moral dissonance theory. In psychology, behavioral ethics, management, and cognitive neuroscience field, loads of researchers have explored factors which would induce individuals to violate social norms consciously and conduct intentional unethical behaviors in specific cultural and social contexts. This paper reviewed the influence of both individual factors and contextual factors on intentional unethical behavior respectively. Individual factors refer to the personal characteristics or attributes, including physical, unconscious, cognitive factors and personality factors. Contextual factors refer to the external features when people perceive about the outside world, including surrounding settings, alert cues, time cues and interpersonal interactions. What's more, previous papers have showed that most of individual factors, in essence, drive people to behave unethically through thriving to obtain self-interest and through exploiting self-control resources, during which contextual factors would weaken or strengthen the effect. But how do these factors exert impacts on people's intentional unethical behavior? According to previous studies, two competitive motivations (the motivation of maintaining moral self-concept vs. the motivation of grabbing the interest) play an underlying role in the process including the evaluation of potential costs and benefits, pre-justification of the impending violations, occurrence of unethical behaviors and post-justification of the happened violations. When facing temptations to conduct unethical behaviors or violations, people would first perceive the threats to be moral self-concept. The motivation of maintaining a positive self-image would be then activated and the pre-violation self-justification strategies (such as tokens preference, self-serving altruism and moral licensing) were to be adopted to buffer the inner conflict, which can help to balance the two motivating forces. Eventually people would conduct unethical behavior in comfort zone, where they gain some financial benefits but still maintain their positive moral self-concept. That means people would consciously avoid minor unethical behavior, which would not bring significant external interest, neither major unethical behavior which would be at the expense of spoiling positive self-concept. After conducting unethical behavior, moral self-concept would be threatened and thus the motivation of maintaining positive self-image would be activated again. In this situation, through specific post-violation selfjustification strategies (such as moral cleansing, moral disengagement, motivated forgetting and moral hypocrisy), moral self-concept would eventually be protected. Future research is expected to give more emphasis on exploring behavioral and psychological mechanisms, especially understanding and avoiding unethical behavior in the perspective of mental motivation and being aware of unconscious factors and processes. Longitudinal tracking methods and the unethical behaviors in the internet context are also supposed to be paid more attention in the future.
来源 心理科学 ,2018,41(2):371-377 【核心库】
DOI 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20180218
关键词 不道德行为 ; 个体因素 ; 情景因素 ; 心理过程 ; 道德自我概念
地址

1. 中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室, 北京, 100101  

2. 中国科学院大学心理学系, 北京, 100049

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 1671-6981
学科 社会科学总论
基金 国家自然科学基金项目 ;  中科院心理所创新项目
文献收藏号 CSCD:6227674

参考文献 共 67 共4页

1.  范伟. 欺骗判断与欺骗行为中自我控制的影响. 心理学报,2016,48(7):845-856 CSCD被引 5 次    
2.  王珏. 道德失调的自我调节策略. 心理科学,2016,39(6):1473-1478 CSCD被引 2 次    
3.  吴宝沛. 道德虚伪:一种机会主义的适应策略. 心理科学进展,2012,20(6):926-934 CSCD被引 3 次    
4.  吴鹏. 道德推理与道德行为关系的元分析. 心理学报,2014,46(8):1192-1207 CSCD被引 11 次    
5.  杨继平. 德行领导与员工不道德行为、利他行为:道德推脱的中介作用. 心理科学,2015,38(3):693-699 CSCD被引 8 次    
6.  杨小君. 不道德行为产生后的道德自我评价. 中国健康心理学杂志,2016,24(2):235-239 CSCD被引 1 次    
7.  张宏伟. 两种道德自我调节机制下的道德行为. 心理科学进展,2014,22(7):1178-1187 CSCD被引 8 次    
8.  Amos S. Winning a competition predicts dishonest behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2016,113(7):1754-1759 CSCD被引 1 次    
9.  Bandura A. Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review,1999,3(3):193-209 CSCD被引 37 次    
10.  Barkan R. The pot calling the kettle black: Distancing response to ethical dissonance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,2012,141(4):757-773 CSCD被引 3 次    
11.  Barkan R. Ethical dissonance, justifications, and moral behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology,2015,6:157-161 CSCD被引 2 次    
12.  Barnes C M. Lack of sleep and unethical conduct. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2011,115(2):169-180 CSCD被引 6 次    
13.  Bastian B. Cleansing the soul by hurting the flesh:The guilt-reducing effect of pain. Psychological Science,2011,22(3):334-335 CSCD被引 5 次    
14.  Blanken I. A meta-analytic review of moral licensing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,2015,41(4):540-558 CSCD被引 3 次    
15.  Boksem M A S. The neural basis of morality,2009 CSCD被引 1 次    
16.  Branasgarza P. Moral cleansing and moral licenses: Experimental evidence. Economics and Philosophy,2012,29(2):199-212 CSCD被引 1 次    
17.  Canner E. Sex, lies and pharmaceuticals: The making of an investigative documentary about 'female sexual dysfunction'. Feminism and Psychology,2008,18(4):488-494 CSCD被引 1 次    
18.  Cascio J. Prospective moral licensing: Does anticipating doing good later allow you to be bad now?. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,2015,56(56):110-116 CSCD被引 5 次    
19.  Castille C M. Prosocial citizens without a moral compass? examining the relationship between machiavellianism and unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Business Ethics,in press CSCD被引 1 次    
20.  Chou E Y. What's in a name? The toll e-signatures take on individual honesty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,2015,61:84-95 CSCD被引 1 次    
引证文献 1 篇

1 颜志强 当局者迷,旁观者清?视角对公平共情道德判断的影响 中国临床心理学杂志,2025,33(2):416-422
CSCD被引 0 次

显示所有1篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护：中国科学院文献情报中心
地址：北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码：100190 联系电话：(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号