帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

基于AdaBoost的投资组合优化
Portfolio Optimization Based on AdaBoost

查看参考文献38篇

钱龙 1   韦江 2   赵慧敏 3   倪宣明 4 *  
文摘 文章利用AdaBoost集成学习技术提升均值-方差(MV)策略的表现.首先,文章对二次期望效用损失函数进行了分歧分解,从理论上表明集成学习技术有助于提升投资组合策略的表现.其次,文章将收益率均值和协方差压缩估计量中的压缩强度设定为样本外绩效驱动,并利用迭代有效集法和梯度下降法最大化效用的值函数,从而构建了参数化的MV策略作为文章策略AdaBoost.PT的弱学习器.在实证方面,文章利用A股近25年和美股近40年的全股票样本数据,考察了集成投资组合策略在夏普率、标准差、换手率和最大回撤方面的样本外表现,并利用假设检验对夏普率差异的显著性进行验证.基于因子组合数据集的实证结果显示,基于收益率均值压缩估计量的集成策略在4个评估指标下和差异性统计检验中能够取得优于基准策略的结果,此外,使用行业组合数据集的稳健性检验同样显示出一致的结果.
其他语种文摘 This paper adopts the AdaBoost ensemble learning technique to boost the performance of mean-variance(MV) strategy. Firstly, this paper conducts an ambiguity decomposition on the quadratic cost function of expected utility, which proves that ensemble learning can boost the performance of portfolio strategies. Secondly, we parameterize the shrinkage intensity of the mean and covariance shrinkage estimator of return to be out-of-sample driven, and use iterative active set and gradient descent algorithms to maximize the value function, constructing parameterized MV strategy as the weak learner of proposed AdaBoost.PT. In terms of empirical study, we utilize the full panel stock data of A shares in near 25 years and American shares in near 40 years, and examine the performance of ensemble portfolio strategies in terms of Sharpe ratio, standard deviation, turnover and maximum drawdown, and then conduct a hypothesis test to check the significance of Sharpe ratio's difference. The empirical results show that the ensemble strategies based on return shrinkage estimator are superior to the baseline strategies under all four indices and statistical tests, and the robust tests based on industrial portfolios also show the same results.
来源 系统科学与数学 ,2022,42(2):271-286 【核心库】
关键词 投资组合优化 ; 集成学习 ; 分歧分解
地址

1. 清华大学经济管理学院, 北京, 100084  

2. 清华大学学生处, 北京, 100084  

3. 中山大学管理学院, 广州, 510275  

4. 北京大学软件与微电子学院, 北京, 100871

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 1000-0577
学科 社会科学总论
基金 国家自然科学基金
文献收藏号 CSCD:7179926

参考文献 共 38 共2页

1.  Markowitz H. Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance,1952,7(1):77-91 被引 732 次    
2.  Merton R C. On estimating the expected return on the market: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Financial Economics,1980,8(4):323-361 被引 46 次    
3.  Michaud R O. The Markowitz optimization enigma: Is 'optimized' optimal?. Financial Analysts Journal,1989,45(1):31-42 被引 19 次    
4.  Best M J. On the sensitivity of mean-variance-efficient portfolios to changes in asset means: Some analytical and computational results. The Review of Financial Studies,1991,4(2):315-342 被引 14 次    
5.  Chopra V K. The effect of errors in means, variances, and covariances on optimal portfolio choice. The Journal of Portfolio Management,1993,19(2):6-11 被引 14 次    
6.  Frost P A. For better performance: Constrain portfolio weights. The Journal of Portfolio Management,1988,15(1):29-34 被引 3 次    
7.  Jagannathan R. Risk reduction in large portfolios: Why imposing the wrong constraints helps. The Journal of Finance,2003,58(4):1651-1683 被引 20 次    
8.  DeMiguel V. A generalized approach to portfolio optimization: Improving performance by constraining portfolio norms. Management Science,2009,55(5):798-812 被引 12 次    
9.  Chan L K C. On portfolio optimization: Forecasting covariances and choosing the risk model. The Review of Financial Studies,1999,12(5):937-974 被引 8 次    
10.  Bekaert G. International stock return comovements. The Journal of Finance,2009,64(6):2591-2626 被引 3 次    
11.  Ledoit O. Honey, I shrunk the sample covariance matrix. Journal of Portfolio Management,2004,30(4):110-119 被引 13 次    
12.  Jobson J D. Putting Markowitz theory to work. Journal of Portfolio Management,1981,7(4):70-74 被引 3 次    
13.  Jorion P. Bayesian and CAPM estimators of the means: Implications for portfolio selection. Journal of Banking & Finance,1991,15(3):717-727 被引 7 次    
14.  Pastor L. Comparing asset pricing models: An investment perspective. Journal of Financial Economics,2000,56(3):335-381 被引 7 次    
15.  Black F. Global portfolio optimization. Financial Analysts Journal,1992,48(5):28-43 被引 34 次    
16.  Ben-Tal A. Robust convex optimization. Mathematics of Operations Research,1998,23(4):769-805 被引 83 次    
17.  Tutuncu R H. Robust asset allocation. Annals of Operations Research,2004,132(1):157-187 被引 12 次    
18.  Garlappi L. Portfolio selection with parameter and model uncertainty: A multi-prior approach. The Review of Financial Studies,2007,20(1):41-81 被引 11 次    
19.  Kan R. Optimal portfolio choice with parameter uncertainty. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,2007,42(3):621-656 被引 12 次    
20.  Tu J. Markowitz meets Talmud: A combination of sophisticated and naive diversification strategies. Journal of Financial Economics,2011,99(3):204-215 被引 11 次    
引证文献 3 篇

1 孙会霞 基于集成学习的加权投资组合优化 系统科学与数学,2022,42(5):1145-1160
被引 2 次

2 黄哲豪 企业金融化:最优配置,动机判别与适度区域 系统工程理论与实践,2023,43(6):1545-1567
被引 0 次

显示所有3篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护：中国科学院文献情报中心
地址：北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码：100190 联系电话：(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号