帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

基于Meta回归方法的中国内陆河流域生态系统服务价值再评估
Revaluation of ecosystem services in inland river basins of China: Based on meta-regression analysis

查看参考文献119篇

颜俨 1   姚柳杨 2   郎亮明 1,3   赵敏娟 1,3 *  
文摘 将流域生态系统服务的经济价值纳入成本效益分析,是解决生态环境问题和实现流域生态资源可持续配置的关键。近年来随着价值评估文献量增加,评估的价值及其影响因素等研究结论由于存在诸多争议而难以应用于管理实践。首次应用Meta回归分析对中国内陆河流域生态系统服务的价值进行综合再评估,结果发现:在价值评估研究中研究对象、受访者、测度方法、撰写发表等4个环节的特征对评估价值均具有显著影响,其中,石羊河和塔里木河的评估价值显著高于黑河,上游的评估价值显著高于中游和下游,二分式条件价值评估法所评估的价值与选择实验法没有显著差异,但显著高于其他条件价值评估法;此外,时间对评估价值呈现显著“衰减效应”,每年下降2%~3%,且期刊文献的评估价值显著高于其他文献的评估价值;通过运用n-1数据分割技术,本文将Meta回归方程结果运用到样本外效益转移并对其进行评估,得到的中位数转移误差为27.12%。相较于现有研究,该结果处于可接受范围。因此,本文运用的Meta回归分析适用于中国内陆河流域效益转移政策地的生态系统服务价值评估。
其他语种文摘 Incorporating the economic value of river basin ecosystem services into cost-benefit analysis is the key to solving environmental problems and achieving a sustainable allocation of water resources in river basins. In recent years, with the increase in valuation literature, there has been much controversy in terms of the amount of value and its influencing factors, which has made it difficult to apply these research results to management practices. In this paper, the meta- regression analysis is first applied to the valuation of ecosystem services in the inland river basins of China. The results show that the valuation can be significantly affected by characteristics of the four aspects of valuation research, specifically: object, respondents, measurement method and publications. Among them, the valuation of both the Shiyang River and the Tarim River is significantly higher than that of the Heihe River. The valuation of the upstream portion is significantly higher than that of the middle and lower reaches. The value assessed by the dichotomous choice contingent valuation method is not significantly different from that of the choice experiments. However, it is significantly higher than values obtained by other contingent valuation methods. In addition, valuation over time shows a "declining effect" of 2%-3% per year and valuation in journal literature is significantly higher than that in other forms of literature. By using the n-1 data splitting technique, we applied the results of the metaregression to out-of-sample benefit transfer, evaluated it, and found a median error of 27.12%. Compared with the existing research, the results are in an acceptable range. Therefore, the metaregression analysis used in this paper is applicable to the valuation of the ecosystem services of the policy sites in the inland river basins of China.
来源 地理学报 ,2019,74(5):1040-1057 【核心库】
DOI 10.11821/dlxb201905015
关键词 生态系统服务价值评估 ; Meta回归分析 ; n-1数据分割技术 ; 内陆河流域
地址

1. 西北农林科技大学经济管理学院, 杨凌, 712100  

2. 陕西师范大学国际商学院, 西安, 710119  

3. 西北农林科技大学六次产业研究院, 杨凌, 712100

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 0375-5444
学科 环境质量评价与环境监测
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目 ;  国家自然科学基金项目
文献收藏号 CSCD:6494800

参考文献 共 119 共6页

1.  Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being,2005 被引 53    
2.  Barbier E B. Economic Valuation of Wetlands: A Guide for Policy Makers and Planners,1997 被引 8    
3.  Bassi N. Status of wetlands in India: A review of extent, ecosystem benefits, threats and management strategies. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies,2014,2:1-19 被引 7    
4.  Zhao B. ESTIMATION OF ECOLOGICAL SERVICE VALUES OF WETLANDS IN SHANGHAI, CHINA. Chinese Geographical Science,2005,15(2):151 被引 17    
5.  Turner R K. Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: Scientific integration for management and policy. Ecological Economics,2000,35(1):7-23 被引 79    
6.  Liu J. China's environment in a globalizing world: How China and the rest of the world affect each other. Nature,2005,435(7046):1179-1186 被引 70    
7.  Kolstad C D. Environmental Economics,2000 被引 1    
8.  Kneese A V. Measuring the Benefits of Clean Air andWater,2011 被引 1    
9.  Chaikumbung M. The economic value of wetlands in developing countries: A metaregression analysis. Ecological Economics,2016,124:164-174 被引 20    
10.  潘家华. 持续发展途径的经济学分析,2007 被引 1    
11.  Adamowicz W. Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,1998,80(1):64-75 被引 17    
12.  Groot R D. Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services,2012,1(1):50-61 被引 104    
13.  陈永伟. 为清洁空气定价:来自中国青岛的经验证据. 世界经济,2012,35(4):140-160 被引 6    
14.  周映梅. 青海湖旅游景观价值初评. 旅游学刊,1992,7(5):8-10,56 被引 2    
15.  张志强. 黑河流域张掖地区生态系统服务恢复的条件价值评估. 生态学报,2002,22(6):885-893 被引 105    
16.  徐中民. 环境选择模型在生态系统管理中的应用——以黑河流域额济纳旗为例. 地理学报,2003,58(3):398-405 被引 13    
17.  徐中民. 额济纲旗生态系统服务恢复价值评估方法的比较与应用. 生态学报,2003,23(9):1841-1850 被引 50    
18.  粟晓玲. 内陆河流域生态系统服务价值的动态估算方法与应用--以甘肃河西走廊石羊河流域为例. 生态学报,2006,26(6):2011-2019 被引 46    
19.  陈克龙. 近25年来青海湖流域景观结构动态变化及其对生态系统服务功能的影响. 资源科学,2008,30(2):274-280 被引 32    
20.  石惠春. 石羊河流域下游生态系统服务功能价值的评估. 冰川冻土,2009,31(6):1195-1200 被引 3    
引证文献 15

1 张娟 哈尼梯田区不同旅游模式村寨土地利用变化对生态系统服务与人类福利的影响 生态学报,2020,40(15):5179-5189
被引 11

2 徐涛 农村居民流域生态治理参与意愿的距离效应——以石羊河流域为例 资源科学,2020,42(7):1395-1404
被引 3

显示所有15篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护:中国科学院文献情报中心
地址:北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码:100190 联系电话:(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号