人格特征和社会支持与空勤人员职业倦怠的关系
Relationship of personality and social support with job burnout among aircrew
查看参考文献25篇
文摘
|
[目的]空勤人员(包括乘务员和安全员)面临着工作负荷大、轮班、时差等多种压力源,是职业倦怠的高发人群。本研究拟探讨空勤人员人格、社会支持与职业倦怠之间的关系。[方法]选取北京某航空公司乘务员、安全员、乘务员兼安全员共615人作为研究对象,男135例(21.9%),女480例(78.1%),年龄在21~51(29.0±4.6)岁。采用中国大五人格量表、社会支持评定量表和中国职业倦怠量表进行调查。采用Pearson相关分析对各计量资料间的相关性进行分析;采用结构方程模型模拟社会支持在人格与职业倦怠之间的中介作用,并分析各变量间的关系。[结果]在615名有效研究对象中,有职业倦怠的空勤人员为376名,占61.1%。其中,轻度倦怠者174名,检出率28.3%;中度倦怠者186名,检出率30.2%;高度倦怠者16名,检出率2.6%。Pearson相关分析表明,职业倦怠量表得分与人格问卷神经质维度得分呈正相关,与社会支持总分、主观支持维度和支持利用度维度呈负相关。人格问卷的五个维度得分与社会支持总分及各维度得分均呈相关。结构方程模型的初始模型的模型适配度较差,经修正后,模型拟合得到改善,规范拟合指数(NFI)、比较拟合指数(CFI)、递增拟合指数(IFI)、拟合优度指数(GFI)均达到可接受水平。社会支持对职业倦怠的直接效应为-0.22(P < 0.001);外向性对社会支持的直接效应为0.31(P < 0.001),而外向性对职业倦怠无直接效应,故社会支持在外向性对职业倦怠的影响中起完全中介作用。神经质对社会支持和职业倦怠的直接效应分别为-0.22(P < 0.001)和0.40(P < 0.001),即社会支持在神经质对职业倦怠的影响中起部分中介作用。[结论]空勤乘务、安全人员中职业倦怠检出率较高。高神经质的空勤人员更易发生职业倦怠。社会支持在人格与职业倦怠的关系中起到中介作用。 |
其他语种文摘
|
[Objective] Aircrew (flight attendants and security officers) are exposed to high workload, shift, and jet lag, thus are vulnerable to job burnout. This study explores the relationship among personality, social support, and job burnout of aircrew. [Methods] A total of 615 (135 males, 21.9%; 480 females, 78.1%) flight attendants, security officers, and concurrent flight attendants & security officers of an airline company in Beijing, at the age of 21-51 (29.0±4.6) years, were recruited. Chinese Big Five Personality Inventory, Social Support Rating Scale, and Chinese Job Burnout Scale were used in the survey. Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to analyze the correlation between measurement data. A structural equation model was used to evaluate the mediating role of social support in the relationship between personality and job burnout and to analyze the relationship between study variables. [Results] There were 376 (61.1%) out of 615 aircrew having job burnout. Among them, 174 were at mild level, with a detection rate of 28.3%; 186 were at moderate level, with a detection rate of 30.2%; 16 were at high level, with a detection rate of 2.6%. The Pearson correlation analysis results showed a positive correlation between job burnout score and neurotic score, and negative correlations of job burnout score with social support total score, subjective support score, and support utilization score. Significant correlations were also found between the scores of all the five dimensions of personality and the total score & dimensional scores of social support. The model fit indices of the initial structural equation model were poor. After modification, the model showed better fit indices as the normed fit index (NFI), comparative fit index (CFI), incremental fit index (IFI), and goodness-of-fit index (GFI) were all acceptable. Social support yielded a direct effect on job burnout (-0.22) (P < 0.001), and extraversion yielded a direct effect on social support (0.31) (P < 0.001) but not on job burnout; therefore, social support played a complete mediating role in the relationship between extraversion and job burnout. Neuroticism yielded direct effects on both social support (-0.22) (P < 0.001) and job burnout (0.40) (P < 0.001); therefore, social support played a partial mediating role in the relationship between neuroticism and job burnout. [Conclusion] A high prevalence of job burnout is found among the studied flight attendants and security officers. Aircrew with higher neuroticism levels are more vulnerable to job burnout. Social support plays a mediating role in the relationship between personality and job burnout. |
来源
|
环境与职业医学
,2019,36(4):388-394 【核心库】
|
DOI
|
10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2019.18773
|
关键词
|
空勤人员
;
人格
;
社会支持
;
职业倦怠
;
中介作用
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室, 北京, 100101
2.
中国科学院大学, 北京, 100101
3.
中国南方航空股份有限公司北京分公司, 北京, 101300
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
2095-9982 |
学科
|
预防医学、卫生学 |
基金
|
国家自然科学基金重点项目
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6487288
|
参考文献 共
25
共2页
|
1.
Cheng T M. I know you are suffering from burnout:the moderated mediation effects of "leisure benefits" and "leisure coping" on the burnout model of flight attendants.
J Air Transp Manag,2018,71:119-129
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
2.
Chen C F. Burnout and work engagement among cabin crew:antecedents and consequences.
Int J Aviat Psychol,2012,22(1):41-58
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
3.
Maslach C. The measurement of experienced burnout.
J Organ Behav,1981,2(2):99-113
|
被引
81
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Adriaenssens J. Determinants and prevalence of burnout in emergency nurses:a systematic review of 25 years of research.
Int J Nurs Stud,2015,52(2):649-661
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
5.
王伯军. 护士的职业倦怠与抑郁焦虑情绪.
中国心理卫生杂志,2013,27(4):312-313
|
被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
6.
沈文礼. 传染病医院护士职业倦怠现况调查.
预防医学,2016,28(12):1218-1220,1225
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Maslach C. What have we learned about burnout and health?.
Psychol Health,2001,16(5):607-611
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
8.
Ng S I. Antecedents and outcomes of flight attendants' job satisfaction.
J Air Transp Manag,2011,17(5):309-313
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
9.
朱姝. 基层医疗机构护士心理健康水平与职业倦怠及人格的关系.
中国农村卫生事业管理,2013,33(1):75-77
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
10.
毛志宏. 教师职业倦怠与自我效能感和大五人格的关系研究.
当代教师教育,2013,6(4):43-47
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
11.
徐宁. 企业员工人格、团队认同及其职业倦怠间的关系.
中国临床心理学杂志,2011,19(4):525-527
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
12.
王雁飞. 社会支持与身心健康关系研究述评.
心理科学,2004,27(5):1175-1177
|
被引
41
次
|
|
|
|
13.
宋丽萍. 职业倦怠与抑郁的关系及社会支持的调节作用研究.
中国全科医学,2018,21(1):93-97
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
14.
王红雨. 安徽省高校辅导员身体活动、社会支持与职业倦怠的关系.
环境与职业医学,2018,35(4):336-340
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
15.
李丹琳. 护理专职教师职业心理模型的人格及社会因素.
西部中医药,2015,28(7):47-49
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
16.
李旭.
幼儿教师职业认同、领悟社会支持与职业倦怠的关系研究,2018
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
17.
李永鑫. 工作倦怠的结构研究.
心理科学,2005,28(2):454-457
|
被引
41
次
|
|
|
|
18.
李永鑫. 工作倦怠评价标准的初步探讨.
心理科学,2006,29(1):148-150,153
|
被引
49
次
|
|
|
|
19.
Ulutasdemir N. The impacts of occupational risks and their effects on work stress levels of health professional(The sample from the Southeast region of Turkey).
Environ Health Prev Med,2015,20(6):410-421
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
20.
戴晓阳.
常用心理评估量表手册,2015:13-22
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|