基于Flow-R模型的八一沟泥石流危险性评价
Hazard assessment of Bayi Gully debris flow based on Flow-R model
查看参考文献29篇
|
文摘
|
目前泥石流危险性评价方法通常是一条泥石流沟对应一个危险等级。Flow-R模型将泥石流源区识别与泥石流运动相结合计算泥石流的危险概率,能够评价一条泥石流沟内不同部位的危险性。为丰富泥石流评价方法的应用研究及探究单沟内泥石流危险分布特征,以八一沟为研究区,在确定八一沟泥石流源区识别阈值和运动参数的基础上,用Flow-R模型对泥石流可能的危害范围进行模拟计算,并用混淆矩阵对模拟结果进行评估,最后对八一沟流域不同部位进行了泥石流危险性评价。结果表明: ( 1)泥石流源区主要分布于沟道20° ~ 50°坡度范围和1 400 ~ 1 600 m高程范围内,沟顶细小汇水沟道为泥石流提供了丰富的活动物质; ( 2)泥石流危险区域大致分布在沟道左右40 m范围,占整个研究区域的20.06%;极高危险区分布于沟道中心,危险性由沟道中心向两边逐渐降低; ( 3) Flow-R应用于研究区的正确率为84.18%,给出的泥石流危险区图合理,能够反映研究区泥石流的基本危险特征。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
At present,debris flow hazard assessment method is usually a debris flow gully corresponding to a hazard level. Flow-R model calculates hazard probability by combining the identification of debris flow source areas and the propagation of debris flow,which can assess the hazard of different parts in a debris flow gully. In order to enrich the application research of debris flow assessment method and explore the characteristics of hazard distribution in single-channel debris flows,taking Bayi Gully as study area,on the basis of determining the threshold value of sources identification and the parameters of propagation,Flow-R model is used to simulate the potential hazard range of debris flow,and then use confusion matrix to evaluate the simulation results. Finally,it assesses the debris flow hazard of Bayi Gully in different parts. The results show: ( 1) Debris flow source areas are mostly distributed in the gullies which the slope range from 20 to 50 degrees and the elevation range from 1 400 to 1 600 meters. The small catchment channels in the top of the gullies provide rich sources to debris flow. ( 2) The hazard areas are distributed roughly within the range of 40m both sides of the channel,accounting for 20.06% of the entire study area. The high hazard areas are distributed in the center of the channel and the hazard gradually decreases from the channel center to both sides. ( 3) The efficiency of Flow-R model applied to the study area is 84.18% and the hazard zonation is reasonable,which can reflect the basic hazard characteristics of debris flow in the study area. |
|
来源
|
自然灾害学报
,2019,28(1):156-164 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.13577/j.jnd.2019.0119
|
|
关键词
|
单沟泥石流
;
危险性评价
;
混淆矩阵
;
Flow-R模型
;
八一沟
|
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院、水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 四川, 成都, 610041
2.
中国科学院大学, 北京, 100049
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1004-4574 |
|
学科
|
地质学;灾害及其防治 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金
;
国家973计划
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6458154
|
参考文献 共
29
共2页
|
|
1.
吴文建. 基于灰色关联分析法的泥石流危险性评价---以泸水县银坡河泥石流为例.
地质灾害与环境保护,2017(3):30-32
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
李秀珍. 多分类支持向量机在泥石流危险性区划中的应用.
水土保持通报,2010,30(5):128-133
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
胡凯衡. 基于数值模拟的泥石流危险性分区方法.
自然灾害学报,2005,14(1):10-14
|
被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Li H C. Basinwide disaster loss assessments under extreme climate scenarios: a case study of the Kaoping River basin.
Natural Hazards,2017,86(3):1039-1058
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Horton P. Flow-R,a model for susceptibility mapping of debris flows and other gravitational hazards at a regional scale.
Natural Hazards & Earth System Sciences,2013,13(4):869-885
|
被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Rahman M S. Landslide initiation and runout susceptibility modeling in the context of hill cutting and rapid urbanization: a combined approach of weights of evidence and spatial multi-criteria.
Journal of Mountain Science,2017,14(10):1919-1937
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Park D W. Coupled model for simulation of landslides and debris flows at local scale.
Natural Hazards,2016,81(3):1653-1682
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Michoud C. Rockfall hazard and risk assessments along roads at a regional scale: example in Swiss Alps.
Natural Hazards & Earth System Sciences,2012,12(3):615-629
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Glade T. Multi-hazard exposure analyses with multirisk-a platform for user-friendly analyses.
12th Congress Interpraevent 2012,Grenoble,France Conference Proceedings,2012
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Roberta P. On the criteria to create a susceptibility map to debris flow at a regional scale using Flow-R.
Journal of Mountain Science,2017(4):14-28
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
张自光. 都江堰市八一沟泥石流形成条件与动力学特征分析.
中国地质灾害与防治学报,2010,21(1):34-38
|
被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
郭朝旭. 八一沟松散堆积体粒度特征研究.
自然灾害学报,2015(4):46-55
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
周伟. 四川省都江堰市八一沟泥石流动力学特征及危险性评估.
水土保持通报,2011,31(5):138-143
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
余斌. 汶川地震后四川省都江堰市龙池镇群发泥石流灾害.
山地学报,2011,29(6):738-746
|
被引
26
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
覃怡. 都江堰八一沟8·13泥石流的形成条件分析.
南水北调与水利科技,2013,11(4):101-104
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Horton P. Debris flow susceptibility mapping at a regional scale.
4th Canadian Conference on Geohazards,2008
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Holmgren P. Multiple flow direction algorithms for runoff modelling in grid based elevation models: An empirical evaluation.
Hydrological Processes,1994,8(4):327-334
|
被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
孟庆华. 陕西凤县泥石流灾害危险性评估.
自然灾害学报,2014,23(1):121-131
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
邹强. 长江上游地区泥石流灾害敏感性量化评价研究.
环境科学与技术,2012,35(3):164-168,172
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
康志成.
中国泥石流研究,2004
|
被引
112
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问