帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

山区LAI遥感产品对比分析及影响因子评价
Intercomparison and evaluation of influencing factors among different LAI products over mountainous areas

查看参考文献35篇

景金城 1,2,3   靳华安 1   唐斌 2   李爱农 1 *  
文摘 叶面积指数(LAI)遥感产品对比分析不仅能够提供产品质量的定量化描述信息,还对产品反演算法优化和认知陆面过程模型的不确定性具有重要意义。为研究不同LAI产品在地形复杂、景观破碎的中国西南地区的表现差异,选择2001-2016年间MODIS(C5、C6)和Geoland2(GEOV1、GEOV2)LAI产品,从时空完整性和连续性方面,对比分析不同LAI产品在山区的变化情况,并比较同源不同版本LAI产品在山区的改进效果。选择地形(如高程、地形起伏度)、植被类型、气候因子,使用地理探测器评估LAI遥感产品受不同下垫面的影响程度。结果表明:(1)高海拔和高地形起伏度区域LAI产品质量较差;(2)MODIS LAI产品连续性整体性差于 Geoland2,MODIS LAI均值在局部地区高于Geoland2,同源产品LAI差值低于非同源产品;(3)MODIS C6主算法反演比例低于C5,时间连续性优于C5,GEOV2反演成功率和连续性优于 GEOV1;(4)各因子对山区LAI变化的贡献量q:地形起伏度最小,MODIS产品受植被类型影响最大,Geoland2产品受高程和气象数据影响较大。通过LAI产品对比分析,能够准确认知山区各因素对LAI产品精度的影响程度,可为山区生产高质量的LAI产品提供借鉴。
其他语种文摘 The validation of LAI products not only provides quantitative quality description,but also plays an important part in the improvement of retrieval algorithm and understanding of uncertainties regarding to land surface process models over rugged surfaces.This study evaluated the performance of MODIS (C5,C6),Geoaldn2 (GEOV1,GEOV2)LAI products using intercomparison methods over Southwestern China.The spatiotemporal distribution of integrity and consistencies,such as the percentage of main algorithm,smoothness index,average value during growing season,yearly mean LAI bias and root mean square error(RMSE),respectively,were investigated during the period 2001-2016.Meanwhile,different versions of the same data source LAI products were compared so as to get a clear understanding of improvement about the new one over heterogeneously hilly regions.Lastly,four factors,such as topography (altitude and relief amplitude),vegetation types,and climate regionalization were selected to assess the influence of different underlying surfaces on LAI products using the Geodetector.The results show that spatial and temporal consistency of these LAI products is good over most areas.All LAI products exhibit a higher percentage of good quality data (i.e.successful retrieval)in mountainous areas,and GEOV2 LAI is higher than others.The percentage in altitude and higher relief amplitude area seems to be low.GEOV2 LAI shows smoother temporal profiles than others,and Geoland2 is smoother than MODIS LAI.It is clear that MODIS C5 is smoother than MODIS C6,and GEOV2 is superior to GEOV1.RMSE and yearly mean LAI bias between one and another LAI product are vulnerable to topographic indices,especially to altitude.Q-statistic in Geodetector is smallest related to relief amplitude,biggest to vegetation for MODIS LAI product,and biggest to climate for Geoland2 LAI.Altitude,vegetation,and climate play a dominant role in spatial distribution of LAI.The validation experience demonstrates the importance of topography,vegetation and climate for LAI estimation over mountainous areas.Considerable attention will be paid to the production of higher quality LAI products in topographically complex terrain.
来源 自然资源学报 ,2019,34(2):400-411 【核心库】
DOI 10.31497/zrzyxb.20190215
关键词 叶面积指数 ; 西南地区 ; 对比分析 ; 地理探测器 ; 空间异质性
地址

1. 中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所数字山地与遥感应用中心, 成都, 610041  

2. 成都理工大学地球科学学院, 成都, 610059  

3. 四川省煤炭设计研究院, 成都, 610031

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 1000-3037
学科 测绘学
基金 国家重点研发计划项目 ;  国家自然科学基金项目 ;  四川省应急测绘与防灾减灾工程技术研究中心开放基金
文献收藏号 CSCD:6431698

参考文献 共 35 共2页

1.  Jin H A. Improvement of spatially and temporally continuous crop leaf area index by integration of CERES-Maize model and MODIS data. European Journal of Agronomy,2016,78:1-12 被引 3 次    
2.  Claverie M. A 30+ year AVHRR LAI and FAPAR climate data record: Algorithm description and validation. Remote Sensing,2016,8(3):263 被引 6 次    
3.  Chaney N W. Hydroblocks: A field-scale resolving land surface model for application over continental extents. Hydrological Processes,2016,30(20):3543-3559 被引 1 次    
4.  Myneni R B. Global products of vegetation leaf area and fraction absorbed PAR from year one of MODIS data. Remote Sensing of Environment,2002,83(1):214-231 被引 120 次    
5.  Yan K. Evaluation of MODIS LAI/FPAR product collection 6. Part 1: Consistency and improvements. Remote Sensing,2016,8(5):359 被引 7 次    
6.  Verger A. Near real-time vegetation monitoring at global scale. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations & Remote Sensing,2014,7(8):3473-3481 被引 7 次    
7.  Xiao Z Q. Use of general regression neural networks for generating the GLASS leaf area index product from time-series MODIS surface reflectance. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing,2014,52(1):209-223 被引 43 次    
8.  Baret F. Evaluation of the representativeness of networks of sites for the global validation and intercomparison of land biophysical products: Proposition of the CEOS-BELMANIP. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing,2006,44(7):1794-1803 被引 18 次    
9.  Ma M G. A prototype network for remote sensing validation in China. Remote Sensing,2015,7(5):5187-5202 被引 7 次    
10.  Jin H A. Intercomparison and validation of MODIS and GLASS leaf area index (LAI) products over mountain areas: A case study in Southwestern China. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation,2017,55:52-67 被引 8 次    
11.  Camacho F. GEOV1: LAI, FAPAR essential climate variables and FCOVER global time series capitalizing over existing products. Part 2: Validation and intercomparison with reference products. Remote Sensing of Environment,2013,137:310-329 被引 19 次    
12.  Jiang C Y. Inconsistencies of interannual variability and trends in long-term satellite leaf area index products. Global Change Biology,2017,23(10):4133-4146 被引 6 次    
13.  Pasolli L. Retrieval of leaf area index in mountain grasslands in the Alps from MODIS satellite imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment,2015,165:159-174 被引 9 次    
14.  杨勇帅. 中国西南山区GEOV1、GLASS和MODIS LAI产品的对比分析. 遥感技术与应用,2016,31(3):438-450 被引 10 次    
15.  Fu G. Validation of MODIS collection 6 FPAR/LAI in the alpine grassland of the Northern Tibetan Plateau. Remote Sensing Letters,2017,8(9):831-838 被引 5 次    
16.  Yan K. Evaluation of MODIS LAI/FPAR Product Collection 6. Part 2: Validation and Intercomparison. Remote Sensing,2016,8(6):460 被引 5 次    
17.  王劲峰. 地理探测器:原理与展望. 地理学报,2017,72(1):116-134 被引 1524 次    
18.  Li X W. Influence of planting patterns on fluoroquinolone residues in the soil of an intensive vegetable cultivation area in northern China. Science of the Total Environment,2013,458:63-69 被引 22 次    
19.  Ren Y. Quantifying the influences of various ecological factors on land surface temperature of urban forests. Environmental Pollution,2016,216:519-529 被引 11 次    
20.  李俊刚. 贵州省煤矿区植被指数变化及其影响因子分析. 生态与农村环境学报,2016,32(3):374-378 被引 12 次    
引证文献 5 篇

1 骆月珍 不同叶面积指数遥感产品在浙江省的差异比较研究 农业现代化研究,2019,40(5):851-861
被引 2 次

2 胡月童 面向遥感叶面积指数产品的地形校正研究 遥感技术与应用,2020,35(5):1070-1078
被引 1 次

显示所有5篇文献

论文科学数据集

1. 基于亚洲和北美28个地面站点观测数据的叶面积指数验证数据集（1 km，2001-2011）

2. 一带一路及其毗邻区域1 km/5 d分辨率叶面积指数数据集（2015）

3. 一带一路及其毗邻区域1 km/5 d分辨率叶面积指数数据集（2014）

数据来源：
国家对地观测科学数据中心
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护：中国科学院文献情报中心
地址：北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码：100190 联系电话：(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号