山东省乡村旅游竞争力评价与障碍因素分析
Analysis of Rural Tourism Competitiveness and Obstacle Factors in Shandong Province
查看参考文献32篇
|
文摘
|
以山东省17地市为研究对象,构建乡村旅游竞争力主要指标评价体系,运用熵权TOPSIS法进行比较排序,并进行障碍度分析,发现:①山东省17地市乡村旅游发展不平衡,烟台市乡村旅游竞争力最高,东营、菏泽、德州、聊城的竞争力较低;各地市竞争力水平空间分布具有差异性,半岛沿海地区乡村旅游竞争力较高,鲁西及鲁北地区竞争力较低;②乡村旅游接待与服务能力是制约大部分地市乡村旅游竞争力提升的第一障碍因素,资源禀赋、自然环境、经济基础及客源市场条件在不同程度上制约各地市乡村旅游竞争力的提高。各地市应采取针对性的措施解决乡村旅游发展的障碍因素,推动乡村旅游合理有序发展。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Rural tourism is a new kind of industries in rural areas. It is of great significance to increase farmers' income, promote the adjustment of rural industrial structure, achieve poverty alleviation, realizes the country revitalization etc. The rapid development of rural tourism has brought a series of problems, such as vicious competition, similar products, environmental pollution. Taking 17 cities of Shandong Province as the research object, this article evaluates the competitiveness of rural tourism rural tourism development level and analyzes the degree of obstacles to make suggestion on the development of rural tourism in this region. Based on the theoretical analysis of the development of the rural tourism, this article constructs the main index evaluation system of rural tourism competitiveness. The evaluation system mainly includes rural tourism resources conditions, environment condition, economic conditions, social conditions and the tourist marketing conditions, which consists of a total 12 factors. The TOPSIS method is used to measure the level of rural tourism competitiveness. Then reveal the factors that hinder the improvement of the competitiveness of rural tourism in this region by using the Obstacle Degree Model (calculating factor contribution, index deviation and obstacle respectively). First, the development level of rural tourism in 17 cities is not balanced. Among them, the highest scores of 0.582 8, the lowest was 0.175 0. The competitiveness of Yantai is the highest, while the competitiveness of Heze, Dongying, Dezhou and Liaocheng is the lowest. Second, there are differences in the competitiveness of cities in the regions. The competitiveness of rural tourism in the eastern is high, with Low competitiveness in the western and northern areas of Shandong Province. Third, the Obstacle Degree Model results show that the tourist reception capacity is the common factors that hinder the improvement of the competitiveness of rural tourism in Shandong Province. Furthermore, the obstacle factors are different between cities. All localities and municipalities in Shandong Province should make efforts to solve the restrictive factors of enhancing the competitiveness of rural tourism and realize the rational and orderly development of rural tourism. Each city should continuously optimize the industrial structure, improve the economic development level, rationally and effectively improve the proportion of the tourism industry in GDP. Government should give full play to the level and ability of the financial and public services, increase the investment in rural tourism infrastructure. In particular, government should guide and rationally support the creation of star farm, improve the reception capacity of rural tourism and solve the biggest obstacle to the development of rural tourism. |
|
来源
|
地理科学
,2019,39(1):147-155 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2019.01.017
|
|
关键词
|
乡村旅游
;
乡村旅游竞争力
;
乡村旅游竞争力障碍度
;
山东
|
|
地址
|
1.
中国海洋大学管理学院, 山东, 青岛, 266100
2.
中国海洋大学海洋发展研究院, 山东, 青岛, 266100
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1000-0690 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
国家教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目
;
中国海洋大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6425269
|
参考文献 共
32
共2页
|
|
1.
程哲. 乡村转型发展产业驱动机制:以盘锦乡村旅游为例.
农业现代化研究,2016,37(1):143-150
|
被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
卢小丽. 国内外乡村旅游研究热点-近20年文献回顾.
资源科学,2014,36(1):200-204
|
被引
36
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Saxena G. Conceptualizing integrated rural tourism.
Tourism Geographies,2007,9(4):347-370
|
被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Cartner W C. Rural tourism development in the USA.
International Journal of Tourism Research,2004,6(3):151-164
|
被引
15
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Briedenhann J. Rural tourism-meeting the challenges of the new South Africa.
International Journal of Tourism Research,2004,6(3):189-203
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
林源源. 国外农业旅游的运行经验及启示.
农业经济问题,2009(12):101-103
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
彭顺生. 中国乡村旅游现状与发展对策.
扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版),2016,20(1):94-98
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
周建明. 试论我国乡村旅游标准化发展历程及体系架构.
旅游学刊,2011,26(2):58-64
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
叶莉. 基于旅游竞争力评价的中国与东盟国家旅游贸易互动分析.
经济地理,2013,33(12):177-181
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
方叶林. 2001年以来省域旅游竞争力的时空演化分析.
长江流域资源与环境,2013,22(Z1):11-17
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
周礼. 长三角城市旅游竞争力综合评价及其空间分异.
经济地理,2015,35(1):173-179
|
被引
20
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
麻学峰. 张家界旅游竞争力时空演变及结构协调性与合理性.
统计与信息论坛,2015,30(9):81-88
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
时雨晴. 中国陆地边境县域旅游竞争力评价.
资源科学,2014,36(6):1133-1141
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
曹辉. 福建省乡村旅游产业潜力和竞争力分析研究.
林业经济问题,2007,27(3):210-216
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
吴素珍.
北京乡村旅游竞争力研究,2010
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
孟秀红. 苏州乡村旅游竞争力研究.
华东经济管理,2013,27(10):30-33
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
赵伟. 福建省县域乡村旅游竞争力评价.
中国农业资源与区划,2017,38(3):183-190
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
胡宇娜. 县域乡村旅游竞争力评价指标体系构建及类型区划研究-烟台市12个县城单元为例.
山东农业大学报(社会科学版),2015,36(6):104-111
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
郭焕成. 中国乡村旅游发展综述.
地理科学进展,2010,29(12):1597-1605
|
被引
47
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
李涛. 江苏省乡村旅游产业发展水平及空间差异分析.
地域研究与开发,2017,36(3):86-91
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问