草原牧区旅游发展对牧户生计的影响——以内蒙古希拉穆仁草原为例
Impact of Tourism Development on the Herdsmen Livelihood in Pastoral Areas: A Case Study of XilaMuren Pastoral Area in Inner Mongolia
查看参考文献25篇
|
文摘
|
草原牧区旅游发展是牧区实现乡村振兴的重要引擎。以内蒙古希拉穆仁草原旅游地牧户为研究案例,分析草原牧区旅游发展对牧户生计的影响。研究结果:①草原旅游使牧户生计模式分化为纯牧户、务工主导型、旅游主导型、旅游专营型,且呈现纯牧户向务工主导型牧户过度,务工主导型牧户向旅游主导型牧户过度,旅游主导型牧户向旅游专营型牧户过度的一般演替规律;②草原旅游发展总体上提高了牧户的生计资本存量,但不同类型牧户生计资本存量具有显著差异,生计资本存量由高到低排序为:旅游专营型牧户、旅游主导型牧户、务工主导型牧户、纯牧户;③牧户参与草原旅游,准则层因子障碍度由大到小排序为:人力资本、金融资本、物质资本、社会资本、自然资本;障碍度指数前6位的指标层因子分别是:成人受教育程度、成人劳动力人数、借债情况、社团网络、生产生活设备、社会参与;④不同类型牧户参与草原旅游发展的首要障碍因素不同,纯牧户是受教育程度,务工主导型牧户是家庭人均收入,旅游主导型与旅游专营型牧户是借债情况。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
The development of prairie tourism is an important driving force for rural revitalization in pastoral areas. The herdsmen of XilaMuren prairie tourism area in Inner Mongolia was selected as the research object, and the impact of grassland tourism development on the livelihood of herdsmen was analyzed. The results indicated that: 1) Prairie tourism differentiated the herdsmen into pure herdsmen, predominantly herdsmen, tourism- leading herdsmen, and tourism-exclusive herdsmen. In addition, it presented the general rule that the pure herdsmen were excessive to the dominant herdsmen. The dominant model was excessive to the tourism-leading type, and the tourism-leading model was excessive to the exclusive herdsmen. 2) The livelihood capital stock of herdsmen had been generally increased due to the development of prairie tourism. However, there were significant differences in the stocks of livelihoods between different types of pastoral households. The order of livelihood capital from high to low was: tourism franchise, tourism dominant, worker dominant, pure shepherd. 3) From the criterion level, the obstacles for herdsmen's participation from high to low in prairie tourism were: human capital, financial capital, material capital, social capital, natural capital . From the indicator level, the top 6 barrier indicators were: adult education, adult labor force, debt, community network, production and living equipment and social participation. 4) There were significant differences among different types of herdsmen to the participation in the development of prairie tourism. The main obstacle for pure herdsmen was the low level of education, for the dominant herdsmen was the low per capita income of the family, and for the tourism-dominated and tourism-exclusive herdsmen was the pressure on external debt. |
|
来源
|
地理科学
,2019,39(1):131-139 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2019.01.015
|
|
关键词
|
草原牧区旅游
;
牧户生计
;
障碍度
;
希拉穆仁草原
|
|
地址
|
1.
西北大学城市与环境学院, 陕西, 西安, 710127
2.
内蒙古财经大学资源与环境经济学院, 内蒙古, 呼和浩特, 010070
3.
中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 中国科学院陆地表层格局与模拟重点实验室, 北京, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1000-0690 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
国家社会科学基金青年项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6425267
|
参考文献 共
25
共2页
|
|
1.
徐斌. 中国草原牧区和半牧区草畜平衡状况监测与评价.
地理研究,2012,31(11):1998-2006
|
被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
王新越. 山东省乡村休闲旅游地的空间分布特征及影响因素.
地理科学,2016,36(11):1706-1714
|
被引
48
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Hwang J. The effect of the rural tourism policy on nonfarm income in South Korea.
Tourism Management,2015,46:501-513
|
被引
15
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Kastenholz E. Food tourism, niche markets and products in ruraltourism:Combining the intimacy model and the experienceeconomy as a rural development strategy.
Journal of Sustainable Tourism,2015,23(8/9):1179-1197
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
孙琨. 青藏地区草原旅游活动环境影响比较研究——以玛曲草原为例.
资源科学,2013,35(11):2209-2216
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
吕君. 典型草原地区旅游发展对土壤环境的影响.
资源科学,2008,30(6):837-842
|
被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
李文杰. 旅游干扰对草原旅游点植被的影响——以内蒙古希拉穆仁草原金马鞍旅游点为例.
资源科学,2012,34(10):1980-1987
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
钟林生. 基于生态敏感性分析的金银滩草原景区旅游功能区划.
应用生态学报,2010,21(7):1813-1819
|
被引
26
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
乌铁红. 地域文化差异对旅游者的旅游地意象感知影响-以内蒙古自治区草原旅游地为例.
旅游学刊,2010(6):66-72
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
钟林生. 内蒙古草原旅游资源及其开发研究.
干旱区资源与环境,2005,19(2):105-110
|
被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
徐佳.
生计资本差异下乌鲁木齐县南山旅游产业基地牧民参与旅游业可持续发展研究,2016
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Parka M. Social disruption theory and crime in rural communities:Comparisons across three levels oftourism growth.
Tourism Management,2009,30(6):905-915
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Amir A F. Sustainable tourism development:A study on community resilience for rural tourismin Malaysia.
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2015,168:116-122
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
谢彦君. 呵护"姆庇之家",重塑乡村旅游可持续发展新理念.
旅游学刊,2017,32(1):8-10
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
朱天龙. 基于GIS的希拉穆仁草原旅游区景观类型的动态变化及分析.
干旱区资源与环境,2018,32(10):95-99
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
贺爱琳. 乡村旅游发展对农户生计的影响-以秦岭北麓乡村旅游地为例.
经济地理,2014,34(12):174-181
|
被引
50
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Nielsen N C. Rural tourism development:Localism and cultural change.
Tourism Management,2010,31(5):693-695
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Robin Biddulph. Limits to mass tourism's effects in rural peripheries.
Annals of Tourism Research,2015,50:98-112
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
李佳. 连片特困民族地区旅游扶贫效应差异研究-基于四川藏区调查的实证分析.
云南民族大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2016,33(6):96-102
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
史玉丁. 乡村旅游多功能发展与农村可持续生计协同研究.
旅游学刊,2018,33(2):15-26
|
被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问