辱虐管理与员工创造力:心理契约破坏和中庸思维的不同作用
Linking abusive supervision with employee creativity: The roles of psychological contract breach and Zhongyong thinking style
查看参考文献48篇
文摘
|
近年来,辱虐管理与员工创造力的关系受到越来越多研究者的关注。在以往研究的基础上,本研究构建了一个有调节的中介作用模型,以探讨中国文化情境下辱虐管理影响员工创造力的中介心理机制及边界条件。采用多阶段-多来源的策略,以93名主管和369名员工为对象,通过多水平结构方程建模技术对三阶段主管-员工配对调查所获取的数据进行分析,结果表明:主管的辱虐管理行为会通过心理契约破坏的中介作用,对员工创造力产生间接的消极影响;但该负向的间接关系的强度对高中庸思维者而言较弱。本研究有助于揭示辱虐管理影响员工创造力的心理机制及边界条件,研究结果对企业员工创造力及创新行为的管理实践也有一定启示。 |
其他语种文摘
|
Although creativity has been recognized as an important employee outcome related with work context, to date little research has examined the relationship between abusive supervision and employee creativity, which has perhaps been hindered by the lack of a theoretical framework outlining the mechanisms underlying this relationship. The current study examined the processes linking abusive supervision to employee creativity in the Chinese context by focusing on the mediating influence of psychological contract breach and the moderating influence of Zhongyong thinking style. We collected data from 93 supervisors and 369 subordinates at three different time points. In the first survey, the subordinates were asked to provide information about abusive supervision and their demography. One week later, these subordinates were asked to answer some questions about psychological contract breach and Zhongyong thinking style. Approximately two months later, we asked these supervisors to rate their subordinates' creativity. Multi-level structuring equation modeling technique and Monte Carlo resampling method were employed to examine the hypothesis about the moderating role of Zhongyong thinking style in the indirect relationship between abusive supervision and employee creativity through psychological contract breach. These findings provided support for the hypothesis that the indirect relationship between abusive supervision and employee creativity through psychological contract breach is moderated by Zhongyong thinking style, such that the indirect relationship is weakened when Zhongyong thinking style is high, rather than low. These findings contribute to our understanding of the relationship between abusive supervision and employee creativity in the Chinese context, and imply that the negative influence of abusive supervision on employee outcomes could be decreased by guiding employees to cultivate Zhongyong thinking style because it can encourage self-regulation of behavior after experiencing abusive supervision. |
来源
|
心理学报
,2019,51(2):238-247 【核心库】
|
DOI
|
10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00238
|
关键词
|
辱虐管理
;
心理契约破坏
;
中庸思维
;
创造力
|
地址
|
1.
西南大学心理学部, 重庆, 400715
2.
中国人民大学商学院, 北京, 100872
3.
中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院行为科学重点实验室, 北京, 100101
4.
西南大学政治与公共管理学院, 重庆, 400715
5.
江苏第二师范学院经济与法政学院, 南京, 210029
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
0439-755X |
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
基金
|
国家杰出青年科学基金项目"组织行为"
;
国家自然科学基金面上项目
;
中央高校基本科研业务经费创新团队项目
;
中央高校基本科研业务经费重点项目
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6417489
|
参考文献 共
48
共3页
|
1.
Aiken L S.
Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions,1991
|
被引
194
次
|
|
|
|
2.
Agarwal U A. Examining perceived organizational politics among Indian managers: Engagement as mediator and locus of control as moderator.
International Journal of Organizational Analysis,2016,24(3):415-437
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
3.
Aquino K. Identity threat and antisocial behavior in organizations: The moderating effects of individual differences, aggressive modeling, and hierarchical status.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2003,90(1):195-208
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Blau P M.
Exchange and power in social life,1964
|
被引
120
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Bliese P D. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis.
Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations,2000:349-381
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Cheung T S. On Zhongyong rationality: The Confucian doctrine of the mean as a missing link between instrumental rationality and communicative rationality.
Asian Journal of Social Science,2003,31(1):107-127
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Cohen J.
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2 ed.),1988
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
8.
Conway N. A daily diary study of affective responses to psychological contract breach and exceeded promises.
Journal of Organizational Behavior,2002,23(3):287-303
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
9.
丁桂凤. 上司不当督导与下属绩效行为的作用机制及其干预策略.
心理科学进展,2012,20(9):1347-1354
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
10.
丁桂凤. 领导不当督导与追随者规范承诺:追随力的中介作用.
心理与行为研究,2013,11(6):796-800
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
11.
Edwards J R. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis.
Psychological Methods,2007,12(1):1-22
|
被引
157
次
|
|
|
|
12.
Han G H. Nightmare bosses: The impact of abusive supervision on employees' sleep, emotions, and creativity.
Journal of Business Ethics,2017,145(1):21-31
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
13.
何轩. 互动公平真的就能治疗"沉默"病吗?——以中庸思维作为调节变量的本土实证研究.
管理世界,2009(4):128-134
|
被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
14.
Hemphälä J. Networks for innovation-but what networks and what innovation.
Creativity and Innovation Management,2012,21(1):3-16
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
15.
Ho M Y. A dynamic process model of forgiveness: A cross-cultural perspective.
Review of General Psychology,2011,15(1):77-84
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
16.
Janssen O. Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour.
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,2000,73(3):287-302
|
被引
23
次
|
|
|
|
17.
Janssen O. How fairness perceptions make innovative behavior more or less stressful.
Journal of Organizational Behavior,2004,25(2):201-215
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
18.
Ji L J. Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2000,78(5):943-955
|
被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
19.
Khazanchi S. Who and what is fair matters: A multi-foci social exchange model of creativity.
Journal of Organizational Behavior,2011,32(1):86-106
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
20.
Kiazad K. Psychological contract breach and employee innovation: A conservation of resources perspective.
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,2014,87(3):535-556
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|