三峡库区规模农地时空变化特征及其驱动机制
Spatio-temporal features of scaling farmland and its corresponding driving mechanism in Three Gorges Reservoir Area
查看参考文献41篇
|
文摘
|
探讨库区农地利用的转型及其机制,可反映中西部结合带、山区、库区的农村变化和人与环境关系的变化,为典型山区的农业多功能转型发展方向提供科学依据。选取三峡库区腹地5个区县为研究区,通过定义“规模农地”相关概念,利用ArcGIS 10.2软件并结合SPSS、地理空间探测器等技术手段对规模农地的变化与机制进行分析。研究发现:规模农地的转移来源主要由耕地和灌木林地组成,除部分高山反季节蔬菜,规模农地的增长一般发生在低海拔地区,且在坡度30°范围内均有分布;不同类型的规模农地空间变化有所不同,但均与道路和乡镇级行政中心的关系明显。斑块水平上,高程、坡度等自然因素对规模农地的贡献相对较大;乡镇水平上以道路交通、农业人口密度等社会经济与人文因素驱动力为主;区域水平上,各区县的驱动因子影响力较研究区整体尺度更为显著。规模农地的变化与发展受多种因素驱动,但农业政策始终是各驱动因素的主导,不同水平的行为主体会促使规模农地发展趋向不同的方向,但原则上均受国家农业发展现状与政府政策导向影响。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
The discussion on function transformation of agricultural utilization and its corresponding driving mechanism in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area (TGRA) can reflect the change of the relationship between people and environment in the transitional belt between central and western China, mountainous areas and reservoir area, and provide a scientific basis for the development of agricultural multi- function in typical mountainous areas. This paper, selected five counties from the hinterland of the TGRA as the study area, analyzed the change of scaling farmland and its corresponding mechanism by defining the concepts of "scaling farmland", with the aid of Arcgis10.2, SPSS, geodetectors and other technical means. Results show that the scaling farmland was mainly converted from cultivated land and shrubland. Apart from some land used for alpine off-season vegetables, the growth of scaling farmland generally occurred at low altitude, and was mainly found in the range with a slope of 30°. The spatial change of scaling farmland of different types was significantly different, which was closely related with road and township administrative center. At the patch level, natural factors such as elevation and slope contribute much to the scaling farmland. At the township level, the driving forces of socioeconomic and humanistic factors were attributed to road traffic, agricultural population density and so on. At the regional level, the influencing factors of each county were more significant than those of the study area. The change and development of scaling farmland was driven by many factors. But the agricultural policy had been one of the dominant factors. Behavior subjects at different levels would promote the scaling farmland development in different directions under the background of national agricultural development and policy implementation. |
|
来源
|
地理学报
,2018,73(9):1630-1646 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.11821/dlxb201809002
|
|
关键词
|
三峡库区
;
农地功能转型
;
时空变化特征
;
驱动机制
|
|
地址
|
1.
重庆师范大学地理与旅游学院, 重庆, 401331
2.
三峡库区地表过程与环境遥感重庆市重点实验室, 三峡库区地表过程与环境遥感重庆市重点实验室, 重庆, 401331
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
0375-5444 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
重庆市基础与前沿研究计划项目
;
重庆师范大学研究生科研创新项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6322265
|
参考文献 共
41
共3页
|
|
1.
Foley J A. Global consequences of land use.
Science,2005,309(5734):570-574
|
被引
684
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Defries R S. Trade-offs in land-use decisions: Towards a Framework for Assessing Multiple Ecosystem Responses to Land-Use Change.
Ecosystems and Land Use Change,2013:1-9
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
朱会义. 土地利用集约化研究的回顾与未来工作重点.
地理学报,2014,69(9):1346-1357
|
被引
30
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
刘纪远. 20世纪80年代末以来中国土地利用变化的基本特征与空间格局.
地理学报,2014,69(1):3-14
|
被引
527
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
董雪娇. 国内外农地规模经营述评.
中国农业资源与区划,2015,36(3):62-71
|
被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
张兰. 农地规模经营影响因素的实证研究:基于江苏省村庄调查数据.
中国土地科学,2015(11):32-39
|
被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
You H. Agricultural landscape dynamics in response to economic transition: Comparisons between different spatial planning zones in Ningbo region, China.
Land Use Policy,2017,61:316-328
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
汤建尧. 经营主体的农地适度规模经营绩效与启示:以湖南省为例.
经济地理,2014,34(5):134-138
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
辛良杰. 农户土地规模与生产率的关系及其解释的印证——以吉林省为例.
地理研究,2009,28(5):1276-1284
|
被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
金生霞. 河西走廊农地适度经营规模计量研究.
干旱区资源与环境,2012,26(11):6-11
|
被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
王亚辉. 中国农地经营规模对农业劳动生产率的影响及其区域差异.
自然资源学报,2017,32(4):539-552
|
被引
22
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
陈秧分. 基于农户调查的东部沿海地区农地规模经营意愿及其影响因素分析.
资源科学,2009,31(7):1102-1108
|
被引
25
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
杨庆媛. 重庆市农地经营的规模问题研究.
西南大学学报(自然科学版),2009,31(4):143-147
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Moran W. Farm size change in New Zealand.
New Zealand Geographer,1997,53(1):3-13
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Tan M. Spatial and temporal variability of farm size in China in context of rapid urbanization.
Chinese Geographical Science,2013,23(5):607-619
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Dannenberg P. Farm size and land use pattern changes in postsocialist Poland.
Professional Geographer,2010,62(2):197-210
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Bartolini F. The common agricultural policy and the determinants of changes in EU farm size.
Land Use Policy,2013,31(2):126-135
|
被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Ilkay U G. Farm size and participation in agri-environmental measures: Farm-level evidence from Slovenia.
Land Use Policy,2015,46:273-282
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Jayne T S. Africa's changing farm size distribution patterns: The rise of medium-scale farms.
Agricultural Economics,2011,47(S1):197-214
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Wang J. Is small still beautiful? A comparative study of rice farm size and productivity in China and India.
China Agricultural Economic Review,2015,7(3):484-509
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问