以小拨大:行为决策助推社会发展
Behavioral decision-making is nudging China toward the overall revitalization
查看参考文献36篇
|
文摘
|
作为《心理学报》“以小拨大:行为决策助推社会发展”专栏的开篇,本文尝试简要介绍助推含义和发展历程,分析助推的必要性,小结助推的主要方法和应用领域,评述助推研究在提升民众的健康、财富、幸福等方面“以小拨大”的作用,澄清关于助推的若干争议,并对研究者开展助推研究提出了若干建议.在文章的最后,我们简要勾勒了本专栏论文的主要内容,讨论了助推研究在国内起步发展的方向,冀望更多的心理学工作者加入到“助推研究”的行列. |
|
其他语种文摘
|
As an editorial for Acta Psychologica Sinica's special column, this paper provides a concise overview of the nudge concept and its progress. The necessity of the concept is analyzed, and the main methods and fields of application are summarized. The effects of the concept on the promotion of people's health, wealth, and happiness are elucidated, and the related disputes are clarified. Several suggestions that may help researchers in carrying out nudge research are also derived. We briefly draw the outlines for several papers in this special column and discuss the outlook for how nudge research should begin in China with the goal of attracting psychologists to devote to nudge research. |
|
来源
|
心理学报
,2018,50(8):803-813 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00803
|
|
关键词
|
助推
;
行为科学
;
行为决策
;
公共政策
;
促进社会发展
|
|
地址
|
1.
浙江大学心理与行为科学系, 杭州, 310028
2.
中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院行为科学重点实验室, 北京, 100101
3.
中国科学院大学心理学系, 北京, 100049
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
0439-755X |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金项目
;
北京市自然科学基金
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6300197
|
参考文献 共
36
共2页
|
|
1.
Allcott H. Social norms and energy conservation.
Journal of Public Economics,2011,95(9/10):1082-1095
|
被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Arimura T H. Cost-effectiveness of electricity energy efficiency programs.
Energy Journal,2012,33:63-99
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Behavioural Insights Team.
The behavioural insights team update report 2013-2015,2015
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Benartzi S. Should governments invest more in nudging?.
Psychological Science,2017,28(8):1041-1055
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Bonini B. Green nudging.
Acta Psychologica Sinica,2018,50(8):814-826
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Dawley L T. Smoking control and smoking rate:Implications for worksite smoking cessation.
Psychological Reports,1991,68(3_suppl):1191-1194
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Dolan P. Influencing behaviour:The mindspace way.
Journal of Economic Psychology,2012,33(1):264-277
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Duchini E. Is college remedial education a worthy investment? New evidence from a sharp regression discontinuity design.
Economics of Education Review,2017,60:36-53
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
樊亚凤. 网络公益平台默认选项设置对个人捐赠意愿的影响及作用机制.
心理学报,2018
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
耿晓伟. 健康目标启动降低高热量食物消费.
心理学报,2018,50(8):840-847
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Gigerenzer G. 人非理性且难教化?论支持自由家长主义的证据.
心理学报,2018
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Grune-Yanoff T. Nudge versus boost:How coherent are policy and theory?.
Minds and Machines,2016,26(1/2):149-183
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Halpern D D.
Inside the nudge unit:How small changes can make a big difference,2015
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Hanks A S. Healthy convenience:Nudging students toward healthier choices in the lunchroom.
Journal of Public Health,2012,34(3):370-376
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
何贵兵. 助推:第三条道路.
管理视野,2016,6:101-105
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
何亚福. "全面二孩"第二年,出生人口为何不升反降?.
新京报,2018
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Hertwig R.
Nudge vs. boost:Agency dynamics under 'libertarian paternalism',2016
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Holland R W. Smells like clean spirit:Nonconscious effects of scent on cognition and behavior.
Psychological Science,2005,16(9):689-693
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
黄元娜. 以小拨大:默认选项和反应模式效应助推中国器官捐献登记.
心理学报,2018,50(8):868-879
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Ito K. Asymmetric incentives in subsidies:Evidence from a large-scale electricity rebate program.
American Economic Journal:Economic Policy,2015,7:209-237
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问