不同密实条件的滑坡堰塞坝漫顶溃决实验
Experimental investigation on overtopping failure of landslide dams with different conditions of compactness
查看参考文献20篇
文摘
|
为研究密实条件对堰塞坝漫顶侵蚀机制的影响,采用室内水槽实验对松散和密实2种状态下的滑坡堰塞坝漫顶溢流破坏过程进行了模拟。结果表明,密实条件对漫顶侵蚀过程有重要影响:松散状态下,堰塞坝的侵蚀过程主要包括面冲刷–冲沟–下蚀–侧蚀等阶段,溯源侵蚀效果不明显,溃决尾声阶段出现沙垄,溃口流量上涨和消退速度快,峰值流量和总输沙量均大于密实状态并且溃口的横向扩展模式为溃口边坡的剪切滑动;密实状态下,堰塞坝会出现陡坎、冲蚀坑等侵蚀过程,溯源侵蚀效果明显,陡坎效应导致溃口水流由非堰流形式—宽顶堰流—实用堰流转化,多级陡坎合并后,溃口水流在陡坎底部产生反向旋流,加速坝体的破坏,溃口横向扩展模式为边坡土体的重力崩塌。 |
其他语种文摘
|
Two types of indoor flume experiments on the breaching process of the dams in loose and dense conditions respectively were carried out to study the influence of compactness on the mechanism of overtopping erosion of landslide dams.The experimental results show that the compactness has a significant effect on the process of overtopping erosion of landslide dams.Under the loose condition,the dam body suffers mainly from surface erosion,gully erosion,lateral erosion and undercut erosion,while the effect of headward erosion is very limited.The breach flow rate rises and drops fast and the dunes are formed when the dam-breaching is close to completion.The breach side is mainly subjected to shear failure in such a situation.Under the dense condition,multiple over falls and scour pit are formed and the effect of headward erosion is obvious.With the development of headcut erosion,the breach flow transforms from the non-weir flow to broad weir flow and then to practical weir flow.When the multiple over falls merged into a single upstream migrating head cut,the reverse swirling flow is formed which accelerates the failure of dam body.The breach side is mainly subjected to gravitational collapse under such a condition. |
来源
|
岩石力学与工程学报
,2018,37(6):1496-1505 【核心库】
|
DOI
|
10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2017.1610
|
关键词
|
边坡工程
;
滑坡
;
堰塞坝
;
泥石流
;
漫顶侵蚀
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 四川, 成都, 610041
2.
中国科学院大学, 北京, 100049
3.
中国地质科学院地质力学研究所, 国土资源部新构造运动与地质灾害重点实验室, 北京, 100081
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1000-6915 |
学科
|
地质学 |
基金
|
国家自然科学基金青年基金资助项目
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6261822
|
参考文献 共
20
共1页
|
1.
Costa J E. The formation and failure of natural dams.
Geological Society of America Bulletin,1988,100(7):1054-1068
|
被引
141
次
|
|
|
|
2.
柴贺军. 天然土石坝稳定性初步研究.
地质科技情报,2001,20(1):77-81
|
被引
27
次
|
|
|
|
3.
Dai F C. The 1786 earthquake-triggered landslide dam and subsequent dam-break flood on the Dadu River, southwestern China.
Geomorphology,2005,65(3):205-221
|
被引
48
次
|
|
|
|
4.
王兰生. 四川岷江叠溪较场地震滑坡及环境保护.
地质灾害与环境保护,2000,11(3):195-199
|
被引
24
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Mizuyama T. Estimating the outflow discharge rate from landslide dam outbursts.
Proceedings of the Interpraevent International Symposium on Disaster Mitigation of Debris Flows,Slope Failures and Landslides. 1(2),2006:365-377
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Davies T R. Modeling landslide dambreak flood magnitudes:Case study.
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,2007,133(7):713-720
|
被引
17
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Wishart J S.
Overtopping breaching of rock balance dam[M. S. Thesis],2007
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
8.
党超. 泥石流堵塞坝溃决模式实验.
灾害学,2008,23(3):15-19
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
9.
张婧. 堰塞坝泄流冲刷试验研究.
四川大学学报:工程科学版,2010,42(5):191-196
|
被引
20
次
|
|
|
|
10.
张健楠.
沟道内堰塞体溃决形成泥石流的机理及特征研究[硕士学位论文],2011
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
11.
赵万玉. 不同横断面泄流槽的地震堰塞湖溃决实验研究.
泥沙研究,2011,4(1):30-37
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
12.
牛志攀. 堰塞湖冲刷及溃决试验研究.
四川大学学报:工程科学版,2009,41(3):90-95
|
被引
20
次
|
|
|
|
13.
张大伟. 堰塞坝漫顶溃决试验及相关数学模型研究.
水利学报,2012,43(8):979-986
|
被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
14.
Awal R. Experimental study on glacial lake outburst floods due to waves overtopping and erosion of moraine dam.
Annuals of Disaster Prevention Research Institute,Kyoto University,2010,53(1):583-594
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
15.
胡卸文. 唐家山滑坡堵江机制及堰塞坝溃坝模式分析.
岩石力学与工程学报,2009,28(1):181-189
|
被引
67
次
|
|
|
|
16.
程谦恭.
高速岩质滑坡动力学,1999:58-64
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
17.
Chang D S. Field testing of erodibility of two landslide dams triggered by the 12 May Wenchuan earthquake.
Landslides,2011,8(3):321-332
|
被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
18.
Mohamed M A A.
Embankment breach formation and modeling methods[Ph. D. Thesis],2002
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
19.
陈仲颐.
土力学,1994:178-182
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
20.
杨顺.
水动力作用下泥石流源区固体物质可移动判别模型研究[博士学位论文],2014
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|