无人机遥感的大型野生食草动物种群数量及分布规律研究
Using UAV remote sensing to analyze the population and distribution of large wild herbivores
查看参考文献35篇
|
文摘
|
以黄河源玛多县为研究区,利用无人机分别于2017年冬春季开展了航拍调查,航拍有效面积达326.6 km~2,获取影像23784张,建立了藏野驴、藏原羚、岩羊等野生动物,以及牦牛、藏羊和马等家畜的无人机图像解译标志库。通过人机交互方式解译,获取调查样带内的种群数量:藏野驴的样带密度为1.15只/km~2,藏原羚为0.61只/km~2,岩羊为0.62只/km~2,家养牦牛为4.12只/km~2,家养藏羊为7.34只/km~2,马为0.06只/km~2。利用冷暖季草场的估算方法,通过地面同步调查验证、统计数据验证,估算出玛多县藏野驴、藏原羚和岩羊,以及家牦牛、藏羊和马的种群数量为:藏野驴17109头,藏原羚15961只,岩羊9324只,牦牛70846头,藏羊102194只,马1156匹。大型野生食草动物藏野驴、藏原羚和岩羊总计8.57万羊单位;家畜藏羊、牦牛和马总计38.90万羊单位;大型野生食草动物和家畜总计47.5万羊单位。大型野生食草动物羊单位数量与家畜羊单位数量之比为1∶4.5。并分析了野生动物分布密度与栖息地生境因子的关系:藏野驴偏好选择高程4200—4400 m,坡度为2°—5°,离农村居民点距离1—2 km和4—5 km,离水源距离小于1 km,离公路距离2—3 km和4—5 km的范围内,草地盖度60—80%。藏原羚偏好选择高程4100—4200 m和4400—4500 m,坡度为大于5°,草地盖度80%以上,离农村居民点距离2—3 km,离水源距离小于1—2 km,离公路距离小于1—2 km和4—5 km的范围内。岩羊偏好选择高程4100—4200 m,坡度为大于5°,草地盖度较低,离农村居民点距离小于1 km,离水源距离小于1—2 km,离公路距离大于5 km的范围内。与传统的地面调查方法相比,基于无人机遥感的大型野生食草动物种群数量调查,具有快速、经济、可靠等优点,为今后野生动物调查提供了一种有效、可靠的技术途径。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
We used Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) to conduct aerial surveys in the winter/spring of 2017 to determine the number and distribution of large wild herbivores and their effects on grassland ecosystems in Maduo County on the Qinghai-Tibet plateau.The effective area of the aerial surveys was 326.6 km~2,and 23784 images were acquired.Interpretation tag libraries for UAV images were set up for wild animals,including Kiang,Tibetan gazelle,and blue sheep,and for livestock,such as yaks,Tibetan sheep,and horses.The population in the survey transect was obtained via the interpretation of human-computer interaction.Statistical methods based on cold- and warm-season grasslands for estimating densities and numbers were compared and verified using a synchronized ground survey and statistical data.The population estimates for kiang,Tibetan gazelle,blue sheep,domestic yak,Tibetan sheep,and horses were 17109,15961,9324,70846,102194,and 1156,respectively.The densities ranged from 1.15/km~2 for kiang,0.61/km~2 for Tibetan gazelle,and 0.62/km~2 for blue sheep to 7.34/km~2 for domestic sheep.The ratio of large wild herbivores in sheep units to livestock in sheep units was 14.5.The relationship between the distribution density of wild animals and the ecological factors of the habitat was analyzed.Kiangs preferred elevations of 4200 m to 4400 m,slopes of 2° to 5°,and grass cover of 60% to 80%.Tibetan gazelles preferred elevations of 4100 m to 4200 m or 4400 m to 4500 m,slopes of more than 5°,and grass cover of more than 80%.Blue sheep preferred elevations of 4100 m to 4200 m,slopes of more than 5°,and low grass cover.All wild species preferred areas that were close to water and far from roads.Compared with traditional ground survey methods,UAV remote sensing surveys of large wild herbivore populations are fast,economical,and reliable,and they provide an effective means to survey wild animals in the future. |
|
来源
|
遥感学报
,2018,22(3):497-507 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.11834/jrs.20187267
|
|
关键词
|
无人机遥感
;
黄河源区
;
大型野生食草动物
;
种群数量
;
分布规律
|
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 中国科学院陆地表层格局与模拟重点实验室, 北京, 100101
2.
中国科学院大学, 北京, 101407
3.
中国科学院成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 成都, 610000
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1007-4619 |
|
学科
|
自然地理学 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金
;
国家重点研发计划
;
青海省重大科技专项
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6246570
|
参考文献 共
35
共2页
|
|
1.
邴龙飞. 近30年黄河源头土地覆被变化特征分析.
地球信息科学学报,2011,13(3):289-296
|
被引
17
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Cai H Y. Human-induced grassland degradation/restoration in the central Tibetan Plateau: the effects of ecological protection and restoration projects.
Ecological Engineering,2015,83:112-119
|
被引
24
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Carr N L. Comparative woodland caribou population surveys in Slate Islands Provincial Park, Ontario.
Rangifer,2012,32(20):205-217
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Chretien L P. Visible and thermal infrared remote sensing for the detection of white-tailed deer using an unmanned aerial system.
Wildlife Society Bulletin,2016,40(1):181-191
|
被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Fan J W. Assessment of effects of climate change and grazing activity on grassland yield in the Three Rivers Headwaters Region of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China.
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2010,170(1/4):571-584
|
被引
65
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
樊江文. 三江源草地载畜压力时空动态分析.
中国草地学报,2011,33(3):64-72
|
被引
37
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
付梦娣. 三江源国家公园功能分区与目标管理.
生物多样性,2017,25(1):71-79
|
被引
22
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Georgiadis N J. Savanna herbivore dynamics in a livestock-dominated landscape:I. Dependence on land use, rainfall, density, and time.
Biological Conservation,2007,137(3):461-472
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
黄麟. 近30年来青海省三江源区草地的土壤侵蚀时空分析.
地球信息科学学报,2011,13(1):12-21
|
被引
18
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Ito T Y. Satellite tracking of Mongolian gazelles (Procapra gutturosa) and habitat shifts in their seasonal ranges.
Journal of Zoology,2006,269(3):291-298
|
被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Laca E A. New approaches and tools for grazing management.
Rangeland Ecology and Management,2009,62(5):407-417
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Lechowicz M J. The sampling characteristics of electivity indices.
Oecologia,1982,52(1):22-30
|
被引
26
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
李青丰. 草畜平衡管理系列研究(3)——草畜平衡核算方法改革.
草业科学,2011,28(12):2190-2194
|
被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
李文娟. 青海省草地生产力及草畜平衡状况研究.
资源科学,2012,34(2):367-372
|
被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
梁天刚. 甘南牧区草畜平衡优化方案与管理决策.
生态学报,2011,31(4):1111-1123
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Liu J Y. Grassland degradation in the"Three-River Headwaters"region,Qinghai Province.
Journal of Geographical Sciences,2008,18(3):259-273
|
被引
37
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
刘世梁. 基于SPOT NDVI 的阿尔金山自然保护区植被动态变化研究.
干旱区研究,2014,31(5):832-837
|
被引
13
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
刘振生. 贺兰山岩羊（Pseudois nayaur）夏季取食和卧息生境选择.
生态学报,2008,28(9):4277-4285
|
被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
买小虎. 国内外草畜平衡研究进展.
中国农学通报,2013,29(20):1-6
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Munn A J. Field metabolic rate, movement distance, and grazing pressures by western grey kangaroos (Macropus fuliginosus melanops) and Merino sheep (Ovis aries) in semi-arid Australia.
Mammalian Biology-Zeitschrift fur Saugetierkunde,2016,81(4):423-430
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问