石灰性紫色土硝化作用及硝化微生物对不同氮源的响应
Response of Nitrification and Nitrifiers to Different Nitrogen Sources in an Alkaline Purple Soil
查看参考文献41篇
文摘
|
土壤中发生的硝化作用是对pH高度敏感的典型过程。本文采用室内恒温培养法,结合定量PCR和高通量测序,研究石灰性紫色土硝化作用以及氨氧化细菌(Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, AOB)、氨氧化古菌(Ammonia-oxidizing archaea, AOA)、亚硝酸盐氧化细菌(Nitrite-oxidizing bacteria, NOB)的丰度与群落结构对不同氮源的响应。结果表明:不同氮源均刺激土壤硝化作用的发生,CO(NH_2)_2处理下的净硝化速率最大,约是CK处理的4.76倍,(NH_4)_2SO_4和NH_4Cl处理下的净硝化速率分别为N 3.88和3.34 mg kg ~(-1) d~(-1)。相比于(NH_4)_2SO_4和CO(NH_2)_2处理,NH_4Cl处理降低了硝态氮的累积量,抑制了铵态氮的减少量。AOB amoA基因拷贝数在28 d培养过程中变化显著(p<0.05),在(NH_4)_2SO_4和CO(NH_2)_2处理中呈先增长后降低趋势,在NH_4Cl处理中呈持续增长趋势;而AOA amoA基因拷贝数无显著变化(p>0.05)。说明石灰性紫色土硝化作用的主要推动者是AOB,而不是AOA。在28 d培养过程中,亚硝酸盐氧化细菌占总微生物的比例高于氨氧化细菌和古菌,意味着石灰性紫色土中可能存在全程氨氧化微生物(Comammox)。高通量测序的结果表明:石灰性紫色土中AOB的优势种群为亚硝化螺菌Nitrosospira Cluster 3,AOA的优势种群是土壤古菌Group 1.1b, NOB的优势种群是硝化螺菌Nitrospira。 |
其他语种文摘
|
【Objective】Nitrification in soil is a highly sensitive process to pH. Responses of nitrification rates and the community structures of nitrifying microorganisms to different N sources in an alkaline purple soil were studied to elucidate the microbiological mechanisms for nitrification.【Method】 Three different N sources and the blank control were used in the 4-week incubation study. Net nitrification rate was calculated by the differences of nitrate concentrations at day 0 and 28. The amoA gene abundances for ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and ammonia oxidizing archaea (AOA) were measured by quantitative PCR before and after the incubation.The relative abundance of nitrite oxidizing bacteria (NOB) was analyzed by binning the sequences of the 16S rRNA gene and the amoA gene into operational taxonomic unit (OTUs) at 97% similarity level.The changes of community structures forAOA, AOB and NOB were studied by high-throughput sequencing method before and after the incubation.【Result】In the 4-week incubation study,compared with blank control (CK),soil nitrification rate was stimulated by application of all three kind of nitrogen sources: ((NH_4)_2SO_4 NH_4C1 and CO(NH_2)_2). The net nitrification rate for blank control (CK) was N 0.86 mg N kg~(-1) d~(-1). The highest net nitrification rate was observed for CO(NH_2)_2 treatment (N3.88 mg kg~(-1) d~(-1)), which was more than 4-times higher than CK. The addition of NH_4Cl and (NH_4)_2SO_4,showed similar stimulation on nitrification to CO(NH_2)_2application. The net nitrification for NH_4Cl and (NH_4)_2SO_4 were N 3.34 and 3.88 mg kg~(-1) d~(-1), respectively. But, NH_4Cl also reduced the accumulation of nitrate and inhibited the reduction of ammonium when compared with (NH_4)_2SO_4,and CO(NH_2)_2. Along with the accumulation of nitrate, the copies of amoA gene in ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AOB) increased significantly during the first two weeks of incubation (p<0.05). The copy numbers of bacterial amoA genes increased from 0.88 × 10~7g~(-1) soil and 0.85 × 10~7g~(-1) soil at day-0 to3.38 × 10~7g~(-1) soil and 3.55 × 10~7g~(-1) soilat the day 14 of the incubation, then decreased to 1.46 × 10~7g~(-1) soil and 1.69 × 10~7g~(-1) soil at the day-28, for (NH_4)_2SO_4 and CO(NH_2)_2 treatments respectively.The copy numbers of bacterial amoA genes were significantly lower in NH_4Cl treatment than (NH_4)_2SO_4 and CO(NH_2)_2 addition at the day 14 (p<0.05). On the other hand, the copies of amoA for AOA did not change significantly during incubation (p>0.05). Results indicated that nitrification in alkaline purple soil was mainly driven by AOB, but not AOA. Pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA genes was performed at the whole microbial community level for different treatments and control before and after incubation. Approximately more than 30 000 high-quality 16S rRNA reads were obtained, and targeted reads from putative AOA, AOB and NOB sequences were selected for subsequent analysis. The high-throughput sequencing results further showed that the dominant nitrifying microorganisms were mainly related toNitrospira, Nitrososmonas and Nitrosospira in the alkaline purple soil. The dominant AOB were classified into Nitrosospira Cluster 3,and the dominant AOA were affiliated with Group 1.1b. Furthermore, the relative abundance of NOBwas much higher than that of AOB and AOA, which may imply the presence of Comammox in the studied alkaline purple soil. |
来源
|
土壤学报
,2018,55(2):479-489 【核心库】
|
DOI
|
10.11766/trxb201709130312
|
关键词
|
土壤氮循环
;
氨氧化细菌
;
氨氧化古菌
;
亚硝酸盐氧化细菌
;
全程氨氧化细菌
|
地址
|
1.
西南大学资源环境学院, 重庆, 400715
2.
中国科学院成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 成都, 610041
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
0564-3929 |
学科
|
农业基础科学 |
基金
|
国家自然科学基金项目
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6209924
|
参考文献 共
41
共3页
|
1.
贺纪正. 氨氧化微生物生态学与氮循环研究进展.
生态学报,2009,29(1):406-415
|
被引
123
次
|
|
|
|
2.
朱兆良. 农田中氮肥的损失与对策.
土壤与环境,2000,9(1):1-6
|
被引
638
次
|
|
|
|
3.
Ushiki N. Nitrite oxidation kinetics of two Nitrospira strains: The quest for competition and ecological niche differentiation.
Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering,2017,123(5):581-589
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Kowalchuk G A. Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria: A model for molecular microbial ecology.
Annual Reviews in Microbiology,2001,55(1):485-529
|
被引
143
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Daims H. A new perspective on microbes formerly known as nitrite-oxidizing bacteria.
Trends in Microbiology,2016,24(9):699-712
|
被引
43
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Hyman M R. ~(14)C_2H_2 and ~(14)CO_2-labeling studies of the de novo synthesis of polypeptides by Nitrosomonas europaea during recovery from acetylene and light inactivation of ammonia monooxygenase.
Journal of Biological Chemistry,1992,267(3):1534-1545
|
被引
15
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Francis C A. New processes and players in the nitrogen cycle: The microbial ecology of anaerobic and archaeal ammonia oxidation.
The ISME Journal,2007,1(1):19-27
|
被引
72
次
|
|
|
|
8.
Prosser J I. Relative contributions of archaea and bacteria to aerobic ammonia oxidation in the environment.
Environmental Microbiology,2008,10(11):2931-2941
|
被引
40
次
|
|
|
|
9.
Taylor A E. Dynamics of ammonia-oxidizing archaea and bacteria populations and contributions to soil nitrification potentials.
The ISME Journal,2012,6(11):2024-2032
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
10.
Jiang X J. pH regulates key players of nitrification in paddy soils.
Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2015,81:9-16
|
被引
25
次
|
|
|
|
11.
He J Z. Quantitative analyses of the abundance and composition of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and ammonia-oxidizing archaea of a Chinese upland red soil under long-term fertilization practices.
Environmental Microbiology,2007,9(9):2364-2374
|
被引
167
次
|
|
|
|
12.
Shen X Y. Nitrogen loading levels affect abundance and composition of soil ammonia oxidizing prokaryotes in semiarid temperate grassland.
Journal of Soils and Sediments,2011,11(7):1243-1252
|
被引
19
次
|
|
|
|
13.
张星. 硝化细菌中亚硝酸盐氧化还原酶的研究进展.
微生物学通报,2008,35(11):1806-1810
|
被引
11
次
|
|
|
|
14.
Randall C W. Nitrite build-up in activated sludge resulting from temperature effects.
Water Environment Federation,1984,56(9):1039-1044
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
15.
Smith R V. A model for nitrite accumulation in soils.
Soil Biology & Biochemistry,1997,29(8):1241-1247
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
16.
Philips S. Origin, causes and effects of increased nitrite concentrations in aquatic environments.
Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology,2002,1(2):115-141
|
被引
33
次
|
|
|
|
17.
Daims H. Complete nitrification by Nitrospira bacteria.
Nature,2015,528(7583):504-509
|
被引
174
次
|
|
|
|
18.
van Kessel M A H J. Complete nitrification by a single microorganism.
Nature,2015,528(7583):555-559
|
被引
131
次
|
|
|
|
19.
佟德利. 三种氮肥对红壤硝化作用及酸化过程影响的研究.
植物营养与肥料学报,2012,18(4):853-859
|
被引
31
次
|
|
|
|
20.
杨剑虹.
土壤农化分析与环境监测,2008
|
被引
206
次
|
|
|
|
|