我国城市居民癌症筛查服务利用现况及服务支付意愿分析
Cancer screening service utilization and willingness-to-pay of urban populations in China: a cross-sectional survey from potential service demander' s perspective
查看参考文献22篇
|
文摘
|
目的了解未参加过城市癌症早诊早治项目及其他国家级癌症筛查项目的城市居民对癌症筛查服务利用现况及对癌症筛查费用的支付意愿情况,从潜在筛查服务需求方的角度探索癌症筛查工作的可持续性。方法2014—2015年基于城市癌症早诊早治项目的16个省份项目点,采用多中心横断面方便抽样方法对目标人群开展纸质问卷调查;采用χ~2检验进行单因素分析、二元logistic回归进行多因素分析。结果最终完成合格调查16 394人。调查对象中做过癌症筛查的居民占12.1%(1984人);对癌症筛查服务利用进行多因素分析显示,年龄为60 ~ 69岁(OR= 1.27,95%CI:1.13~ 1.43)、女性(男性OR=0.56,95%CI:0.50~0.62)、学历偏高者(高中/中专OR= 1.51,95%CI: 1.35 ~ 1.70;大学及以上OR=2.10,95%CI: 1.36 ~ 3.25)、事业单位等和企业单位等职业的人群(企业人员等OR=1.32,95%CI:1.06~1.64;事业单位人员等OR=2.85,95%CI:2.26~ 3.59)、收入偏高者(6~ 15万元OR=1.55,95%CI: 1.39~ 1.73; ≥15万元OR=2.57,95%CI:2.09~ 3.15)、城镇职工医疗保险/公费医疗(OR=1.15,95%CI:1.01~1.32)以及城镇居民医疗保险/商业保险(OR=1.01,95%CI:0.84~ 1.22)的人群对癌症筛查服务利用率更高。在不考虑费用等因素的情况下,65.8% (10 795人)的调查对象愿意接受癌症筛查服务,且做过癌症筛查的居民对癌症筛查的接受度更高(P<0.05)。对于多种癌症联合筛查,61.2%( 10 038人)的居民愿意付费,多因素分析显示,年龄为40 ~ 59岁(60 ~ 69岁OR=0.80,95%CI:0.74 ~ 0.87)、企事业单位等职业人群(企业人员OR=1.32,95%CI: 1.18 ~ 1.47;事业单位人员OR==1.76,95%CI: 1.56 ~1.98)、收入偏高者(6 ~ 15万OR= 1.51,95%CI: 1.40 ~1.63;≥ 15万OR= 1.95,95%CI: 1.60 ~ 2.38)及做过癌症筛查人群(OR=2.18,95%CI:1.94~2.46)的支付意愿更高。结论居民癌症筛查服务利用仍有较大的提升空间;年龄、性别、学历、职业、收入、医保是癌症筛查服务利用的主要影响因素;居民有一定的支付意愿,但支付额度有限,年龄、职业、收入、癌症筛查服务利用是居民支付意愿的主要影响因素。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Objective To explore the sustainability of cancer screening strategy from potential demander' s perspective in Chinese country, we conducted a study on the use of cancer screening services and willingness-to-pay among the urban community residents. All the participants of this study had not been on the Cancer Screening Program in Urban China (CanSPUC) or any other national level cancer screening projects. Methods Target communities and populations were selected from the 16 project provinces in China which were on the program between 2014 and 2015, by using the multi-center cross-sectional convenience sampling method. Chi-square was used to compare the rates on the utilization of service and willingness-to-pay across the different subgroups. Logistic progression was conducted to examine factors that associated with the service utilization and willingness-to-pay. Results A total of 16 394 participants were included in this study. Among them, 12.1% (1 984/16 394) had ever been on a cancer screening program. Populations with following characteristics as: being elderly (60-69 years, OR= 1.27,95% CI: 1.13-1.43), female (male, OR= 0.56, 95%CI: 0.50-0.62), having had higher education (high school/specialized secondary school, OR= 1.51, 95%CI: 1.35-1.70; college or over, OR=2.10, 95%CI: 1.36-3.25),working for public (OR=2.85,95% CI: 2.26-3.59), enterprises or self-employed agencies (OR=1.32, 95% CI: 1.06-1.64), having higher income (60 000-150 000 Chinese Yuan, OR=1.55, 95%CI: 1.39-1.73;≥ 150 000 Chinese Yuan, OR=2.57, 95% CI: 2.09-3.15), under basic medical insurance programs for urban employees/for government servants ‘ (OR=1.15,95% CI: 1.01-1.32), on basic medical insurance set for urban residents '/on commercial medical insurance programs etc. (OR= 1.01, 95%CI: 0.84-1.22), were in favor of the services. When neglecting the fee for charge, 65.8% (10 795/16 394) of the participants said that they could accept the cancer screening program, particularly in those who had already been on the screening program (P<0.05). 61.2% (10 038/16 392) of all the participants showed the willingness-to-pay for a long-term packaging screening services, particularly in those who were relatively younger (60- 69 years, OR=0.80, 95%CI: 0.74-0.87),working for public (OR=1.76, 95% CI: 1.56-1.98) or enterprise sectors or self-employed households (OR= 1.32, 95%CI: 1.18-1.47), having higher income (60 000-150 000 Chinese Yuan, OR=1.51, 95%CI: 1.40-1.63;≥ 150 000 Chinese Yuan, OR= 1.95, 95% CI: 1.60-2.38), utilized screening services (OR=2.18, 95% CI: 1.94-2.46). Conclusions The rate of using the cancer screening services should be improved. Factors including age, gender, education, occupation, income and insurance appeared as major factors related to the use of cancer screening services. Willingness-to-pay seemed relatively high, but the amount of payment they could afford was limited. Factors including age, occupation, income and insurance appeared as major factors to the willingness-to-pay. |
|
来源
|
中华流行病学杂志
,2018,39(2):165-172 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2018.02.006
|
|
关键词
|
肿瘤
;
筛查
;
可持续性
;
服务利用
;
支付意愿
|
|
地址
|
1.
中国医学科学院北京协和医学院医学信息研究所, 北京, 100020
2.
国家癌症中心/中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院, 北京, 100021
3.
哈尔滨市疾病预防控制中心, 哈尔滨, 150056
4.
湖南省肿瘤医院, 长沙, 410006
5.
哈尔滨医科大学卫生管理学院, 150081
6.
安徽医科大学卫生管理学院, 合肥, 230032
7.
兰州大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学研究所, 730000
8.
山东大学卫生管理与政策研究中心, 济南, 250012
9.
河南省肿瘤医院, 郑州, 450008
10.
甘肃省肿瘤医院, 兰州, 730050
11.
山东省肿瘤医院, 济南, 250117
12.
广西医科大学, 南宁, 530021
13.
辽宁省肿瘤医院, 沈阳, 110042
14.
哈尔滨医科大学附属肿瘤医院, 150081
15.
重庆市肿瘤研究所, 重庆, 400030
16.
新疆医科大学附属肿瘤医院, 乌鲁木齐, 830011
17.
浙江省肿瘤医院, 杭州, 310022
18.
山西省肿瘤医院, 太原, 030013
19.
江苏省疾病预防控制中心, 南京, 210009
20.
云南省肿瘤医院, 昆明, 650118
21.
开滦总医院, 唐山, 063000
22.
唐山市人民医院, 唐山, 063001
23.
宁波市第二医院, 宁波, 315010
24.
徐州市疾病预防控制中心, 徐州, 221006
25.
南通市肿瘤医院, 南通, 226000
26.
城市癌症早诊早治项目卫生经济学评价工作组
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
0254-6450 |
|
学科
|
医药、卫生 |
|
基金
|
国家重大公共卫生服务项目(城市癌症早诊早治项目)
;
WHO 2016 — 2017双年度合作项目
;
中国医学科学院中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6203071
|
参考文献 共
22
共2页
|
|
1.
国家卫生和计划生育委员会.
中国卫生和计划生育统计年鉴2015,2015:284-285
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
陈万青. 2013年中国恶性肿瘤发病和死亡分析.
中国肿瘤,2017,26(1):1-7
|
被引
226
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
代敏. 全球肿瘤预防控制概况.
中国肿瘤,2011,20(1):21-25
|
被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
董志伟. 中国癌症控制策略研究报告.
中国肿瘤,2002,11(5):250-260
|
被引
74
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
代敏. 我国城市地区癌症筛查供需方角度的可持续评估.
中华流行病学杂志,2018,39(2):139-141
|
被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Smith R A. Cancer screening in the United States, 2015: a review of current American cancer society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening.
CA Cancer J Clin,2015,65(1):30-54
|
被引
23
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
潘鹏涛.
基于p53抗体的肿瘤早期筛查及肿瘤检测研究,2014
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Kelaher M. The transtheoretical model and cervical screening: Its application among culturally diverse communities in Queensland, Australia.
Ethn Health,1999,4(4):259-276
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Katz S J. Socioeconomic disparities in preventive care persist despite Universal coverage: breast and cervical cancer screening in Ontario and the United States.
JAMA,1994,272(7):530-534
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Lockwood-Rayermann S. Characteristics of participation in cervical cancer screening.
Cancer Nurs,2004,27(5):353-363
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
龚鹏翔. 妇女乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查情况及影响因素分析.
中国公共卫生管理,2015(2):264-265,267
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
梁霁. 上海市社区宫颈癌筛查服务利用影响因素研究.
中国卫生资源,2011,14(2):111-113
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Di J L. Knowledge of cervical cancer screening among women across different Socio-Economic regions of China.
PLoS One,2015,10(12):e0144819
|
被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
李莉. 2012年中国居民健康素养影响因素分析.
中国健康教育,2015,31(2):104-107
|
被引
30
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Cho Y I. Effects of health literacy on health status and health service utilization amongst the elderly.
Soc Sci Med,2008,66(8):1809-1816
|
被引
10
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
何源. 国内外"两癌"筛查服务利用与提供的研究进展.
南京医科大学学报:社会科学版,2017(1):1-6
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Andersen R M. Improving access to care in America: individual and contextual indicators.
Changing the U.S. health care system: key issues in health services,policy, and management. 3~(rd) ed,2007:3-31
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
万丽红. 脑卒中病人的健康行为及其影响因素研究.
护理研究,2010,24(1):1-4
|
被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
董小方.
郑州市社区脑卒中高危人群健康行为影响因素分析,2014
|
被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
朱娟. 我国城市居民对多种癌症联合筛查的频率倾向及支付意愿.
中华流行病学杂志,2018,39(2):157-164
|
被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问