我国城市地区癌症筛查项目人员对筛查工作意愿倾向的多中心调查及政策建议
Willingness and preferences of actual service suppliers regarding cancer screening programs: a multi-center survey in urban China
查看参考文献7篇
|
文摘
|
目的基于癌症筛查实际供方角度,从工作人员主观感受及意愿层面评价癌症筛查项目的可持续性。方法2014 - 2015年,基于城市癌症早诊早治项目,在16个省份项目点选取2013—2015年所有承担项目的医院、CDC和社区卫生服务中心,采用纸质问卷和网络调查开展访谈,对象包括宏观管理人员、具体项目管理人员和一线工作人员等。结果最终完成访谈4626份,访谈对象总体认为参加项目的最大收获在于社会价值感的提升(63.6%)、当地影响力(35.9%)及专业技能提升(30.6%)等;最大困难在于社会物质激励不够所致工作积极性低(30.9%)、信息采集口径不一致(28.3%)、部门间协调(24.4%)和机构间沟通衔接困难(23.5%)等。当单项筛查服务劳务补偿约50元时,工作人员会考虑加班工作。63.7%的受访者有长期筛查服务意愿,主要原因:可通过项目提升个人/团队在当地影响口碑(48.7%)、通过项目提升个人/团队专业技能(43.1%)等;无服务意愿者主要担心工作量超负荷(59.8%)、对日常工作的干扰(49.8%)等。结论收获与困难相关结果提示,若要长期可持续性开展癌症筛查工作,建议加强项目内荣誉激励、对外宣传及专业能力建设,根据具体情况提高劳务补偿。服务意愿结果则提示,应从政府和领导层面加强信息化建设及机构/部门间协调,机构内应合理协调筛查项目与日常工作。 |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Objective From the perspective of actual service suppliers regarding cancer screening, this study aimed to assess the long-term sustainability of cancer screening programs in China. Methods Based on a Cancer Screening Program in Urban China (CanSPUC), our survey focused on all the hospitals, centers for disease control and prevention (CDC) and community service centers across 16 provinces in China which participated in the programs between 2013 and 2015. All the managers (institutional/department level) and professional staff involved in the program were interviewed using either paper-based questionnaire or online approach. Results A total of 4 626 participants completed the interview. It showed that the main gains from providing screening service emphasized promotion in social value (63.6% ),local reputation (35.9%), and professional skills (30.6%), whereas difficulties encountered included inadequate compensation (30.9%) and discordance among information systems (28.3%). When the service remuneration amounts to about 50 Chinese Yuan per screening item, those professional staff self-reported that they would like to work overtime. More than half (63.7%) of the staff expressed willingness to provide routine screening service, the main expectations were to promote their reputation to the local residents (48.7%) and to promote professional skills (43.1%). Those who were not willing to provide screening services were worried about the potential heavy workload (59.8%) or being interfered with their routine work (49.8%). Further detailed results regarding the different organization types and program roles were presented in the following detailed report. Conclusions Findings of gains and difficulties showed that if cancer screening is expected to become a long-term running, incentive mechanism from the program, external promotion and advocacy as well as capacity building should be strengthened; furthermore, rewards to staff's screening services should be raised according to the local situations. Results regarding the "willingness to provide service" showed that management of the program should also be strengthened,including information system building and inter-agency and inter-department coordination at the government levels. |
|
来源
|
中华流行病学杂志
,2018,39(2):142-149 【核心库】
|
|
DOI
|
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2018.02.003
|
|
关键词
|
肿瘤
;
筛查
;
服务
;
供方
;
可持续性
|
|
地址
|
1.
国家癌症中心/中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院, 北京, 100021
2.
中国医学科学院北京协和医学院医学信息研究所, 北京, 100020
3.
哈尔滨市疾病预防控制中心, 哈尔滨, 150056
4.
重庆市肿瘤研究所, 重庆, 400030
5.
哈尔滨医科大学卫生管理学院, 150081
6.
安徽医科大学卫生管理学院, 合肥, 230032
7.
兰州大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学研究所, 730000
8.
山东大学卫生管理与政策研究中心, 济南, 250012
9.
湖南省肿瘤医院, 长沙, 410006
10.
河南省肿瘤医院, 郑州, 450008
11.
广西医科大学, 南宁, 530021
12.
哈尔滨医科大学附属肿瘤医院, 150081
13.
浙江省肿瘤医院, 杭州, 310022
14.
新疆医科大学附属肿瘤医院, 乌鲁木齐, 830011
15.
山东省肿瘤医院, 济南, 250117
16.
甘肃省肿瘤医院, 兰州, 730050
17.
铁岭市中心医院, 铁岭, 112000
18.
云南省肿瘤医院, 昆明, 650118
19.
山西省肿瘤医院, 太原, 030013
20.
江苏省疾病预防控制中心, 南京, 210009
21.
宁波市第二医院, 宁波, 315010
22.
开滦总医院, 唐山, 063000
23.
唐山市人民医院, 唐山, 063001
24.
徐州市疾病预防控制中心, 徐州, 221006
25.
南通市肿瘤医院, 南通, 226000
26.
城市癌症早诊早治项目卫生经济学评价工作组
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
0254-6450 |
|
学科
|
医药、卫生 |
|
基金
|
国家自然科学基金
;
WHO 2016 — 2017双年度合作项目
;
科技部重大慢性非传染性疾病防控专项
;
中国医学科学院医学与健康科技创新工程项目
;
国家重大科技专项
;
国家重大公共卫生服务项目——城市癌症早诊早治项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:6203068
|
参考文献 共
7
共1页
|
|
1.
Gruen R L. Sustainability science: an integrated approach for health-programme planning.
Lancet,2008,372(9649):1579-1589
|
被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
石菊芳. 中国癌症筛查的卫生经济学评价.
中华预防医学杂志,2017,51(2):107-111
|
被引
17
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Shi J F. Sustainability of cancer screening in China: a multicentre assessment from the perspective of service suppliers and demanders.
Lancet,2017,390(Suppl 1):S95
|
被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
代敏. 我国城市地区癌症筛查供需方角度的可持续评估.
中华流行病学杂志,2018,39(2):139-141
|
被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Zhao F H. A multi-center survey of HPV knowledge and attitudes toward HPV vaccination among women, government officials, and medical personnel in China.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev,2012,13(5):2369-2378
|
被引
12
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
新华网.
北京医改四个多月呈现"五升五降"新局面,2017
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
国家卫生和计划生育委员会疾病预防控制局.
关于印发中国癌症防治三年行动计划(2015 - 2017年)的通知,2015
|
被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问